Our research was designed to provide a rigorous test of J. R. Hilgard's hypothesis that hypnotizability is related to a history of physical punishment and to imaginative involvements. College students who reported a history of physical abuse (N = 21) and sexual abuse (N = 23) were compared with control subjects who either lost a parent by way of death or divorce (N = 20) or who were from intact homes (N = 35), under test conditions that minimized the possibility that context effects would prejudice the findings. No support was found for the hypothesis that increased hypnotizability was associated with a history of physical or sexual abuse: All of the groups were indistinguishable on measures of objective and subjective response to hypnosis. However, consistent with Hilgard's hypothesis, physically and sexually abused subjects were found to be more fantasy-prone than subjects in both nonabused control conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HilgardJ. R., Personality and Hypnosis: A Study of Imaginative Involvement. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
2.
HilgardJ. R., Imaginative Involvement: Some Characteristics of the Highly Hypnotizable and Nonhypnotizable, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, pp. 238–256, 1974.
3.
HilgardJ. R., Imaginative and Sensory-Affective Involvements in Everyday Life and Hypnosis, in Hypnosis: Developments in Research and New Perspectives, FrommE.ShorR. (eds.), Aldine Publishing, New York, pp. 438–518, 1979.
4.
TellegenA.AtkinsonG., Openness to Absorbing and Self-Altering Experiences (“absorption”), A Trait Related to Hypnotic Susceptibility, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, pp. 268–277, 1974.
5.
CouncilJ. R.KirschI.HafnerL. P., Expectancy versus Absorption in the Prediction of Hypnotic Responding, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 182–189, 1986.
6.
LynnS. J.RhueJ. W., Fantasy-Proneness: Hypnosis, Developmental Antecedents, and Psychopathology, American Psychologist, 43, pp. 35–44, 1988.
7.
de GrohM., Correlates of Hypnotic Susceptibility, in Hypnosis: The Cognitive Behavioral Perspective, SpanosN.ChavesJ. (eds.), Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 32–63, 1989.
8.
WilsonS. C.BarberT. X., Imagery, Vol. 2: Concepts, Results and Applications, KlingerE. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 341–387, 1981.
9.
RhueJ. W.LynnS. J., Fantasy-Proneness: Developmental Antecedents, Journal of Personality, 55, pp. 121–137, 1987.
10.
NashM.LynnS. J.GivensD., Adult Hypnotic Susceptibility, Childhood Punishment and Child Abuse, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32, pp. 14–18, 1984.
11.
NashM.LynnS., Child Abuse and Hypnotic Ability, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 5, pp. 211–217, 1985.
12.
deGrootH. P.GwynnM. I.SpanosN. P., The Effects of Contextual Information and Gender on the Prediction of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.
13.
DrakeS. D.NashM. R.CawoodG. N., Imaginative Involvement and Hypnotic Susceptibility: A Reexamination of the Relationship, Unpublished manuscript, The University of Tennessee, 1988.
14.
RhueJ. W.LynnS. J.VinocourS.ClarkK.WeissF., The Effecte of Contextual Factors on the Relation between Hypnotic Susceptibility and Absorption, Paper presented at the meeting of the 9th American Conference, Los Angeles, 1985.
15.
SpanosN. P.GaboraN. J.JarrettL.GwynnM., Contextual Determinants of Hypnotizability and of Relationships between Hypnotizability Scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.
16.
TellegenA., Differential Personality Questionnaire, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1976.
17.
ShorR. E.OmeE. C., The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A. Consulting Psychology Press, Palo Alto, California, 1962.
18.
BeckA. T.BeamesderferA., Modern Problems in Pharmo-Psychiatry, Vol. 7. PinchotP. (ed.), Karger, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 151–169, 1974.
19.
EckbaldM.ChapmanL. J., Magical Ideation as an Indicator of Schizotypy, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, pp. 215–225, 1983.
20.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P.RaulinM. L., Scales for Physical and Social Anhedonia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, pp. 374–382, 1976.
21.
MiersT. C.RaulinM. L., Development of a Scale to Measure Cognitive Slippage, Presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, 1985.
22.
LynnS. J.GreenJ. P.RhueJ. W., Fantasy-Proneness in Hypnotic “Virtuosos,” Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, 1989.
23.
WeitzenhofferA. M.HilgardE. R., Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Forms I and II. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1963.
24.
LynnS. J.DudleyK., The Magical Ideation Scale: A Construct Validation Study, Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, 1987.
