Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Salpêtrière school of hypnosis posited that true hypnotic effects occur spontaneously in people with repressive tendencies. Consistent with this early position, the current study indicates that both spontaneous amnesia after hypnosis and spontaneous recovery during rehypnosis are statistically associated with repression (but not with hypnotic suggestibility). In contrast, both suggested forgetting and suggested recovery are statistically associated with hypnotic suggestibility (but not with repression). Whereas the latter effects of suggestibility are attributable to the demand characteristics of hypnotic suggestions, the spontaneous effects of hypnosis on repressers' memories are not reducible to social psychological principles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ellenberger

H. F.

, The Discovery of the Unconscious, Basic Books, New York, 1970.

Eysenck

H. J.

Furneaux

W. D.

, Primary and Secondary Suggestibility: An Experimental and Statistical Study, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, pp. 485–503, 1945.

Ehrenreich

G. A.

, The Relationship of Certain Descriptive Factors to Hypnotizability, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 52, pp. 24–27, 1949.

Hilgard

E. R.

Cooper

L. M.

, Spontaneous and Suggested Posthypnotic Amnesia, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, pp. 261–273, 1965.

Cooper

L. J.

, Spontaneous and Suggested Posthypnotic Source Amnesia, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 14, pp. 180–193, 1966.

Schor

R. E.

Orne

E. C.

, Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1962.

Weitzenhoffer

A. M.

Hilgard

E. R.

, Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1962.

Hilgard

E. R.

Hilgard

J. R.

, Hypnosis in the Relief of Pain (Appendix A), William Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, 1975.

Byrne

, The Repression-Sensitization Scale: Rationale, Reliability, and Validity, Journal of Personality, 29, pp. 334–349, 1961.

10.

Janet

, The Major Symptoms of Hysteria, Macmillan, New York, 1907.

11.

Janet

, Principles of Psychotherapy ( Guthrie

H. M.

Guthrie

E. R.

, Trans.), Books for Libraries Press, Freeport, NY, 1971 (reprint of 1924 edition).

12.

Kunzendorf

R. G.

, Repression as the Monitoring and Censoring of Images: An Empirical Study, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 5, pp. 31–40, 1985–86.

13.

Hull

C. L.

, Hypnosis and Suggestibility: An Experimental Approach, Appleton-Century, New York, 1933.

14.

Hilgard

E. R.

, Hypnotic Susceptibility, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1965.

15.

Hilgard

E. R.

, Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action, Wiley, New York, 1977.

16.

Sarbin

T. R.

, Contributions to Role-Taking Theory: I. Hypnotic-Behavior, Psychological Review, 57, pp. 255–270, 1950.

17.

Spanos

N. P.

Radtke

H. L.

, Hypnotic Visual Hallucinations as Imaginings: A Cognitive-Social Perspective, Imagination Cognition, and Personality, 1, pp. 147–170, 1981–82.

18.

Kunzendorf

R. G.

, Self-Consciousness as the Monitoring of Cognitive States: A Theoretical Perspective, manuscript submitted for publication, 1985.

19.

Kunzendorf

R. G.

, Hypnotic Hallucinations as “Unmonitored” Images: An Empirical Study, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, in press.

Spontaneous Post-Hypnotic Amnesia and Spontaneous Rehypnotic Recovery in Repressers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References