Many people have speculated over the last 80 years or so about the possibilities of using colored paper to boost response-rates to surveys and questionnaires, and several studies have been carried out. Most of these enquiries report no significant effects from using colored paper, although there have been some exceptions. In this investigation we pooled together the results from all of the experimental studies known to us on the topic and we carried out a meta-analysis to see if there might be a positive effect for colored paper overall. The results indicated that this was not the case, for we found no significant differences between the response rates to white and to colored paper in general. However, when we considered separately the most common colors used, it appeared that pink paper had the greatest effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ReedV., Planned Marketing, Ronald Press, New York, 1929 [cited by 11].
2.
GreerT. V. and LohtiaR., Effects of Source and Paper Color on Response Rates in Mail Surveys, Industrial Marketing Management, 23, pp. 47–54, 1994.
3.
LaGarceR. and WashburnJ., An Investigation into the Effects of Questionnaire Format and Color Variations on Mail Survey Response Rates, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25: 1, pp. 47–70, 1995.
4.
FoxR. J.CraskM. R., and KimJ., Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response, Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, pp. 467–491, 1988.
5.
GullahornJ. E. and GullahornJ. T., An Investigation of the Effects of Three Factors on Response to Mail Questionnaires, Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, pp. 294–296, 1963.
6.
PressleyM. M. and TullarW. L., A Factor Interactive Investigation of Mail Survey Response Rates from a Commercial Population, Journal of Marketing Research, 41, pp. 108–111, 1977.
7.
PucelD. J.NelsonH. F., and WheelerD. N., Questionnaire Follow-up Returns as a Function of Incentives and Responder Characteristics, Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 19, pp. 188–193, 1971.
8.
DunlapJ. W., The Effect of Color in Direct Mail Advertising, Journal of Applied Psychology, 34, pp. 280–281, 1950.
9.
MattesonM. T., Type of Transmitted Letter and Questionnaire Color as Two Variables Influencing Response Rates in a Mail Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, pp. 535–536, 1974.
10.
JobberD. and SandersonS., The Effects of a Prior Letter and Coloured Questionnaire Paper on Mail Survey Response Rates, Journal of the Market Research Society, 25, pp. 339–349, 1983.
11.
ButtleF. and ThomasG., The Effect of Mail Questionnaire Colour on Response Rate, Working Paper No. 350, University of Manchester Business School, Manchester, United Kingdom, 1996.
12.
FullertonS. and DodgeH. R., The Impact of Color on Response Rates for Mail Questionnaires, Academy of Marketing Science Proceedings, 11, pp. 413–415, 1988.
13.
HartleyJ., Obtaining Reprints—Does Color Help?Science Communication, 22, pp. 212–218, 2000.
14.
WrightJ. S.WarnerD. S.WinterW. L., and ZeiglerS. K., Advertising, McGraw Hill, New York, 1997.
15.
CrozierW. R., The Psychology of Colour Preferences, Surface Coatings International, 12, pp. 577–585, 1997.
16.
DudleyR. T., The Relationship between Negative Affect and Paranormal Belief, Personality and Individual Differences, 28, pp. 315–321, 2000.
17.
HemphillM., A Note on Adults' Color-Emotion Associations, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 157, pp. 275–280, 1996.
18.
PlackJ. J. and SchickJ., The Effects of Color on Human Behavior, Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, 9, pp. 4–16, 1974.
19.
ReadM. A.SugawaraA. I., and BrandtJ. A., Impact of Space and Color in the Physical Environment on Pre-School Children's Co-Operative Behavior, Environment and Behavior, 31, pp. 413–428, 1999.
20.
SchaieK. W., Scaling the Association between Colors and Mood Tones, American Journal of Psychology, 74, pp. 266–273, 1961.
21.
SinclairR. C.SoldatA. S., and MarkM. M., Affective Cues and Processing Strategy: Color-Coded Examination Forms Influence Performance, Teaching of Psychology, 25, pp. 130–132, 1998.
22.
StoneN. J. and EnglishA. J., Task Type, Posters and Workspace Color on Mood, Satisfaction, and Performance, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, pp. 175–185, 1998.
23.
BenderD. H., Colored Stationery in Direct-Mail Advertising, Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, pp. 161–164, 1957.
24.
BlytheI. and EssexP., Variations on a Postal Theme, Paper to the Annual Conference of the Market Research Society, pp. 35–51, March 1981 [cited in 10].
25.
HartleyJ., Postcard, Letter or E-mail? What's the Best Way to Obtain a Reprint?Science Communication, 19, pp. 56–61, 1997.
26.
ByromJ. and BennionD., The Effect of Personalisation on Mailed Questionnaire Response Rates, International Journal of Market Research, 42, pp. 357–358, 2000.
27.
KoloskiN. A.TalleyN. J.BoyceP. M., and Morris-YatesA. D., The Effects of Questionnaire Length and Lottery Ticket Inducement on the Response Rate in Mail Surveys, Psychology and Health, 16, pp. 67–75, 2001.
28.
MitchellV.-W., Improving Mail Survey Responses from UK Academics: Some Empirical Findings, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, pp. 59–70, 1998.
29.
SummersJ. and PriceJ. H., Increasing Return Rates to a Mail Survey among Health Educators, Psychological Reports, 81, pp. 551–554, 1997.
30.
HartleyJ., Return to Sender. Why Written Communications Fail, The Psychologist, 11, pp. 477–480, 1998.
31.
SchenkmanB. N. and JohnsonF. U., Aesthetics and Preferences for Web Pages, Behaviour and Information Technology, 19, pp. 367–377, 2000.
32.
BirnbaumM. H. (ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet, Academic Press, San Diego, 2000.
33.
JeromeL. W.DeleonP. H.JamesL. C.FolenR.EarlesJ., and GedneyJ. J., The Coming of Age of Telecommunications in Psychological Research and Practice, American Psychologist, 55, pp. 407–421, 2000.
34.
PettitF. A., A Comparison of World-Wide Web and Paper and Pencil Personality Questionnaires, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, pp. 50–54, 2002.
35.
SchmidtW. C., World-Wide-Web Survey Research: Benefits, Potential Problems, and Solutions, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, pp. 274–279, 1997.
36.
TaylorH., Does Internet Research Work?International Journal of Market Research, 42, pp. 51–63, 2000.
37.
TruellA. D.BartlettH., and AlexanderM. W., Response-Rate, Speed and Completeness: A Comparison of Internet-Based and Mail Surveys, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, pp. 46–49, 2002.
38.
GrossY., The Effects of Visual Variables on E-mail Recipients' Response Rate, unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Department of Management, Tel-Aviv University, Israel, 2002.
39.
HartleyJ.SottoE., and PennebakerJ. W., Speaking Versus Typing: A Case-Study of the Effects of Using Voice-Recognition Software on Academic Correspondence, British Journal of Educational Technology, 34: 1, pp. 5–16, 2003.
40.
HartleyJ.SottoE., and PennebakerJ. W., Style and Substance in Psychology: Are Influential Psychology Articles More Readable than Less Influential Ones?Social Studies of Science, 32: 2, pp. 321–334, 2002.
41.
HartleyJ.HoweM. J. A., and McKeachieW. J., Writing Through Time: Longitudinal Studies of the Effects of New Technology on Writing, British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, pp. 141–151, 2001.
42.
HartleyJ., Clarifying the Abstracts of Systematic Literature Reviews, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88: 4, pp. 332–337, 2000.
43.
HartleyJ., and GanierF., Which Do You Prefer? Some Observations on Preference Measures in Studies of Structured Abstracts, European Science Editing, 26: 1, pp. 4–7, 2000.
44.
HartleyJ., Could This Be Easier to Read? Tools for Evaluating Text, in The Applied Psychologist (2nd Ed.), HartleyJ. and BranthwaiteA. (eds.), Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 113–125, 2000.
45.
HartleyJ., What Does It Say? Text Design, Medical Information and Older Readers, in Processing of Medical Information in Ageing Patients, ParkD. C. (eds.), Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 233–248, 1999.
46.
HartleyJ., Designing Instructional Text, Nichols, East Brunswick, New Jersey, 1994.
47.
RutherfordA., Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM Approach, Sage, London, 2000.
