Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We report the results of research that examined the ways in which a computer simulation of a banking workplace influenced high school students general knowledge and understanding about the world of work. The stance taken is that the society must be seen as joinable and permeable if students are to positively and successfully enter the world of work. Using a semi-structured interview that was built around a conceptual framework of the work-world, students who used the simulation were compared with non-use students. The framework included three core constructs: general job awareness (job list); worksense (pathways in, typical days, and types of skills); and trade-offs (choices, complexity of reasoning, current efforts). Results indicated that students who used the simulation had a broader sense of work and had more subtle understandings of current trade-offs than did the non-use students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowes

J. M.

Goodnow

J. J.

(1996). Work for home, school, or labor force: The nature and sources of changes in understanding. Psychological Bulletin, 119:2, 300–321.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1999). Employment experience and other characteristics of youths: Results from a new longitudinal survey. United States Department of Labor.

Ferrari

Taylor

VanLehn

(1999). Adapting work simulations for schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21:1, 25–53.

Geer

(1972). Learning to work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Grubb

W. N.

Badway

(1995). Learning work: Making the transition from school to work. 1. Linking school-based and work-based learning: The implications of LaGuardia's co-op seminars for school-to-work programs (PB95-263711). Berkeley: University of California.

Jeong

Taylor

Chi

M. T. H.

(2000, August). Learning from computer workplace simulation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 705–710). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kantor

(1994). Managing the transition from school to work: The false promise of youth apprenticeship. Teachers College Record, 95:4, 442–461.

Kazis

Goldberger

(1995). The role of employers: The integration of work-based learning. In Grubb

W. N.

(Ed.), Education through occupations in American high schools (pp. 171–190). New York: Teachers College Press.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

10.

McGregor

M. U.

Chi

M. T. H.

(2002). Collaborative interactions: The process of joint production and individual reuse of novel ideas. Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 655–678). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

McQuaide

Leinhardt

Stainton

(1999). Ethical reasoning: Real and simulated. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21:4, 433–474.

12.

Newman

Lennon

(1995, Summer). The job ghetto. The American Prospect, 22, 66–67.

13.

Olson

(1997). The school to work revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

14.

Stone

J. R.

III Stern

Hopkins

McMillion

(1990). Adolescents' perceptions of their work: School supervised and non-school supervised. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 15:2, 31–53.

15.

Vickers

Hart

Weinberg

(1995). Learning work: Making the transition from school to work. 1. The work-based learning experiences of students in two Boston-based youth apprenticeship demonstration sites. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.

16.

Wieler

S. S.

Bailey

T. R.

(1997). Going to scale: Participation in school-to-work programs at LaGuardia Community College. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19:2, 123–140.

17.

Wilson

W. J.

(1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Finding and Building the Joinable Society

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References