An increasing proportion of the population is not currently employed; health inequalities research should include these people in analyses. Labor market position is the key determinant of health in Western societies; it is essential to clarify the independent effects of the three main components of labor market position: educational qualifications, occupational class, and employment status. These issues are addressed using national data from the British General Household Survey for 1991–1992 and two measures of ill-health: limiting long-standing illness and self-reported health. Occupational class is a stronger predictor than educational qualifications of measures of ill-health for men and long-term illness for women. When employment status is included in the models, the class gradient is weakened, suggesting that omitting the nonemployed from class analyses will produce a seeming weakening of class inequalities in health. The analyses show that class inequalities in health are somewhat greater for nonemployed than employed men, but weaker for nonemployed than employed women. In spite of older people having left the labor market many years earlier, class based on their previous occupation continues to have a major effect on their health. Class should be the primary variable in analyses of inequalities in health, and all groups of the nonemployed should be analyzed using their last main occupation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HunterD. J.VageroD., (eds.), Health in ‘Crisis’? Critical Problems in Health and Health Care. Soc. Sci. Med., Special Issue, 32: 359–524, 1991.
2.
FoxA. J. (ed.). Health Inequalities in European Countries. Gower, Aldershot, 1989.
3.
Department of Health and Social Security. Inequalities in Health, The Black Report. London, 1980.
4.
TownsendP.DavidsonN.WhiteheadM.Inequalities in Health and the Health Divide. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1988.
5.
FoxA. J.GoldblattP.Socio-Demographic Mortality Differentials from the OPCS Longitudinal Study 1971–75, Ser. LS, No. 1. HMSO, London, 1982.
6.
SmithG. DaveyBartleyM.BlaneD.The Black Report on socioeconomic inequalities in health 10 years on. Br. Med. J.301: 373–377, 1990.
7.
ArberS.Opening the ‘Black’ box: Understanding inequalities in women's health. In New Directions in the Sociology of Health, edited by AbbottP.PayneG., Falmer Press, Brighton, 1990.
8.
ArberS.Class, paid employment and family roles: Making sense of structural disadvantage, gender and health status. Soc. Sci. Med.32: 425–436, 1991.
9.
DoyalL.What Makes Women Sick? Gender and the Political Economy of Health. Macmillan, London, 1995.
10.
MoserK.PughH.GoldblattP.Inequalities in women's health: Looking at mortality differentials using an alternative approach. Br. Med. J.296: 1221–1224, 1988.
11.
PopayJ.BartleyM.Conditions of labour and women's health. In Readings for a New Public Health, edited by MartinC. J.McQueenD. V., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1989.
12.
BartleyM.PopayJ.PlewisI.Domestic conditions, paid employment and women's experience of ill-health. Sociol. Health Illness14: 313–343, 1992.
13.
MacranS.Women's socio-economic status and self-assessed health: Identifying some disadvantaged groups. Sociol. Health Illness16: 182–208, 1994.
14.
MartikainenP.Socioeconomic mortality differentials in men and women according to own and spouse's characteristics in Finland. Sociol. Health Illness17: 353–375, 1995.
15.
SternJ.The relationship between unemployment and morbidity and mortality in Britain. Popul. Stud.37: 61–74, 1983.
16.
WarrP.Twelve questions about unemployment and health. In New Approaches to Economic Life, edited by RobertsB., Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1985.
17.
BartleyM.Unemployment and health: Causality or selection—a false antithesis?Sociol. Health Illness10: 41–67, 1988.
18.
PayneR.WarrP. B.HartleyJ.Social class and psychological illhealth during unemployment. Sociol. Health Illness6: 152–174, 1984.
19.
WarrP. B.JacksonP.Factors influencing the psychological impact of prolonged unemployment and re-employment. Psychol. Med.15: 795–807, 1985.
20.
ArberS.GinnJ.Gender and Later Life: A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. Sage, London, 1991.
21.
ArberS.GinnJ.Gender and inequalities in health in later life. Soc. Sci. Med.36: 33–16, 1993.
22.
ArberS.GinnJ.The gendered resource triangle: Health and resources in later life. In Locating Health: Sociological and Historical Explanations, edited by PiattS., Avebury, Aldershot, 1993.
23.
ArberS.LahelmaE.Women, paid employment and ill-health in Britain and Finland. Acta Sociol. 36: 121–138, 1993.
24.
DahlE.Inequality in health and the class position of women—the Norwegian experience. Sociol. Health Illness13: 492–505, 1991.
25.
ArberS.Gender and class inequalities in health: Understanding the differentials. In Health Inequalities in European Countries, edited by FoxA. J., Gower, Aldershot, 1989.
26.
GoldthorpeJ. H.Women and class analysis: In defence of the conventional view. Sociology17: 465–488, 1983.
27.
RahkonenO.ArberS.LahelmaE.Health inequalities in early adulthood: A comparison of young men and women in Britain and Finland. Soc. Sci. Med.45: 163–171, 1995.
28.
WestP.Inequalities? Social class differentials in health in British youth. Soc. Sci. Med.27: 291–296, 1988.
29.
LonginoC. F.WarheitG. H.GreenJ. A.Class, aging and health. In Aging and Health, edited by MarkidesK. S., Sage, Beverly Hills, 1989.
30.
GloverJ.ArberS.Polarisation in mother's employment: Occupational class, age of youngest child, employment rights and work hours. Gender, Work and Organisation2: 165–179, 1995.
31.
ArberS.Social class, non-employment, and chronic illness: Continuing the inequalities in health debate. Br. Med. J.294: 1067–1073, 1987.
32.
DahlE.Social inequality in health—the role of the healthy worker effect. Soc. Sci. Med.33: 1077–1086, 1993.
33.
FoxA. J.GoldblattP.JonesD. R.Social class mortality differentials: Artefact, selection or life circumstances?J. Epidemiol. Community Health39: 1–18, 1983.
34.
SmithK.Women, Work and Whether Occupation Matters: Differences in Mortality by Occupations in the US 1991–1987. Paper presented at the XIII World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, July 1994.
35.
VageroD.Women, Work and Health. Paper presented at the XIII World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, July 1994.
36.
KitagawaE. M.HauserP. M.Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in Socioeconomic Epidemiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.
37.
LahelmaE.Comparison of inequalities in health: Evidence from national surveys in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Soc. Sci. Med.38: 517–524, 1994.
38.
ValkonenT.Adult mortality and level of education: A comparison of six countries. In Health Inequalities in European Countries, edited by FoxA. J., Gower, Aldershot, 1989.
39.
PowerC.FoxA. J.ManorO.Health and Class: The Early Years. Chapman and Hall, London, 1993.
40.
GinnJ.ArberS.Gender, class and income inequalities in later life. Br. J. Sociol.42: 369–396, 1991.
41.
GinnJ.ArberS.Heading for hardship: How the British pension system has failed women. In Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, edited by BaldwinS.FalkinghamJ., Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 1994.
42.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. General Household Survey, 1991. HMSO, London, 1993.
43.
WelinL.Prospective studies of social influences on mortality. Lanceti: 915–918, 1985.
44.
MosseyJ. M.ShapiroE.Self-rated health: A predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am. J. Public Health72: 800–808, 1982.
45.
ShapiroE.TateR.Who is really at risk of institutionalization?The Gerontologist28: 237–245, 1988.
46.
ArberS.GilbertN.Re-assessing women's working lives. In Women and Working Lives: Divisions and Change, edited by ArberS.GilbertN., Macmillan, London, 1991.
47.
MartinJ.RobertsC.Women and Employment: A Lifetime Perspective. Department of Employment/OPCS. HMSO, London, 1984.
48.
DexS.Women's Occupational Mobility: A Lifetime Perspective. Macmillan, London, 1987.
49.
KohliM.Time for Retirement: Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labour Force. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
