This article addresses the concept of pursuing more focussed and innovative drug abuse prevention efforts in urban settings. Concentrating in inner city junior high school youths, our study found an interactive relationship between perceived neighborhood setting and various supports for, and consequences of, their drug involvement. The results imply that the processes by which youths become involved with drugs should be the focus of future research to enhance and improve drug abuse prevention programs. Finally, we recommend such research be utilized: 1) to identify and reduce youths' drug abuse vulnerability; and 2) to reestablish or create socio-cultural norms which reinforce limited and controlled drug use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrotmanR. and SuffetF., The Concept of Prevention and Its Limitations, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 417, pp. 53–65, 1975.
2.
Cabinet Committee on Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation, Recommendations for Future Federal Activities in Drug Abuse Prevention, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977.
3.
MasonM. L., Drug Education Effects: Final Report, ERIC ED 071011, 1972.
4.
Anonymous, Drug Education No Panacea, Crime and Delinquency, 19, pp. 277–278, 1973.
5.
Second Report of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, Drug Use in America: Problem in Perspective, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1973.
6.
SchapsE.DiBartoloR.PalleyC. S. and ChurginS., Primary Prevention Evaluation Research: A Review of 127 Program Evaluations, Pyramid Project—Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Walnut Creek, California, 1978.
7.
DemboR., Substance Abuse Prevention Programming and Research: A Partnership in Need of Improvement, Journal of Drug Education, 9, pp. 189–208, 1979.
8.
ChambersC. D. and InciardiJ. A., An Assessment of Drug Use in the General Population: Special Report No. 2, N.Y.S. Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, Albany, New York, 1971.
9.
RittenhouseJ. D. (ed.), The Epidemiology of Heroin and Other Narcotics, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1977.
10.
BrunswickA. F., Health and Drug Behavior: A Study of Urban Black Adolescents, Addictive Diseases: An International Journal, 3, pp. 197–214, 1977.
11.
ClaytonR. R. and VossH. L., Young Men and Drugs in Manhattan: A Causal Analysis, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1981.
12.
DemboR.BurgosW.BabstD.SchmeidlerJ., and LaGrandL., Neighborhood Relationships and Drug Involvement Among Inner City Junior High School Youths: Implications for Drug Education and Prevention Programming, Journal of Drug Education, 8, pp. 231–252, 1978.
13.
SingleE.KandelD. B., and FaustR., Patterns of Multiple Drug Use in High School, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, pp. 344–357, 1974.
14.
BabstD. V.UppalG., and SchmeidlerJ., Relationship of Youths' Attitudes to Substance Use In New York State, New York State Office of Drug Abuse Services, New York, New York, 1977.
15.
KandelD. B., Reaching the Hard-to-Reach: Illicit Drug Use Among High School Absentees, Addictive Diseases: An International Journal, 1, pp. 465–480, 1975.
16.
SmartR. G., Recent Studies of the Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use 1970–1974, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 17, pp. 326–333, 1975.
17.
BlumerH. A.SutterA.AhmedS., and SmithR., The World of Youthful Drug Use, University of California at Berkeley, School of Criminology, Berkeley, California, 1967.
18.
FeldmanH. W., Ideological Supports to Becoming and Remaining a Heroin Addict, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9, pp. 131–139, 1968.
19.
FeldmanH. W., American Way of Drugging, Society, May/June, pp. 32–38, 1973.
20.
FeldmanH. W., Street States and the Drug Researcher: Issue in Participant-Observation, Drug Abuse Council, Washington, D.C., 1974.
21.
DemboR.SchmeidlerJ.BurgosW., and TaylorR., Environmental Setting and Early Drug Involvement Among Inner City Junior High School Youths, Department of Criminal Justice, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 1981.
22.
DemboR.FarrowD.SchmeidlerJ., and BurgosW., Testing a Causal Model of Environmental Influences on the Early Drug Involvement of Inner City Junior High School Youths, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 6, pp. 313–336, 1979.
23.
BoyleJ. M. and BrunswickA. F., What Happened in Harlem? Analysis of a Decline in Heroin Use Among a Generation Unit of Urban Black Youth, Journal of Drug Issues, 10, pp. 109–130, 1980.
24.
DemboR., Critical Factors in Understanding Adolescent Aggression, Social Psychiatry, 8, pp. 212–219, 1973.
25.
KandelD. B., Drug and Drinking Behavior Among Youth, Annual Review of Sociology, 6, pp. 235–285, 1980.
26.
KandelD. B., Some Comments on the Relationship of Selected Criteria Variables to Adolescent Illicit Drug Use, in Predicting Adolescent Drug Abuse: A Review of Issues, Methods and Correlates, LettieriD. J. (ed.), Research Issues 11, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1975.
27.
KandelD. B.KesslerR., and MarguliesR., Antecedents of Adolescent Initiation into Stages of Drug Use: A Developmental Analysis, in Longitudinal Research on Drug Use, KandelD. B. (ed.), Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1978.
28.
DemboR.BurgosW.Des JarlaisD., and SchmeidlerJ., Ethnicity and Drug Use Among Urban Junior High School Youths, International Journal of the Addictions, 14, pp. 557–568, 1979.
29.
DemboR.SchmeidlerJ. and BurgosW., Processes of Early Drug Involvement in Three Inner City Neighborhood Settings, Deviant Behavior, in press.
30.
HavlicekL. L. and PetersonN. L., Effect of the Violation of Assumptions upon Significance Levels of the Pearson r, Psychological Bulletin, 84, pp. 373–377, 1977.
31.
ShawC. R. and McKayH. D., Social Factors in Juvenile Delinquency, Report of the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement (Wickersham Commission) (No. 13, Vol. 2), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1931.
32.
ShawC. R. and McKayH. D., Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1942.
33.
SellinT., Culture Conflict and Crime, Social Science Research Council, Bulletin 41, New York, 1938.
34.
SutherlandE. H., Development of a Theory, in The Sutherland Papers, CohenA. K. (eds.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 1956.
35.
ClowardR. and OhlinL. H., Delinquency and Opportunity, Free Press, New York, 1960.
36.
KaplanS. R. and RomanM., The Organization and Delivery of Mental Health Services in the Ghetto: The Lincoln Hospital Experience, Praeger, New York, 1973.
37.
ZinbergN. E.JacobsenR. C., and HardingW. M., Social Sanctions and Rituals as a Basis of Drug Abuse Prevention, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2, pp. 165–182, 1975.
38.
JacobsonR. C. and ZinbergN. E., The Social Basis of Drug Abuse Prevention, Drug Abuse Council, Washington, D.C., 1975.
39.
DemboR. and BurgosW., A Framework for Developing Drug Abuse Prevention Strategies for Young People in Ghetto Areas, Journal of Drug Education, 6, pp. 313–325, 1976.
