The international asbestos industry is under considerable pressure in some countries to control dust exposures in the workplace and restrict pollution. In addition, major firms in the United States face mounting compensation costs for past failures to protect asbestos workers. At the same time, however, the asbestos industry is expanding in developing nations, largely on the strength of sales of asbestos-cement construction materials.
This report describes problems encountered with the use of asbestos-cement in schools and low-income housing in Puerto Rico, resulting in the condemnation of these buildings and the relocation of over 1,000 families at public expense. The manufacturer of the asbestos-cement panels, a Colombian affiliate of the European-based multinational Eternit, escaped all liability.
The issue is presented as a needless, expanding threat to public health worldwide. Safe, economic alternatives exist, such as the use in some cases of crop waste fibers in place of asbestos as a cement binder. There have also been major advances in the commercialization of asbestos-free brake and clutch friction products.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SchepersG. W. H.Discussion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.132: 246–247, 1965.
2.
BridbordK.Estimates of the Fraction of Cancer in the United States Related to Occupational Factors. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C., September 15, 1978.
3.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man: Asbestos, Volume 14. Lyon, France, 1977.
4.
SelikoffI. J.HammondE. C.SeidmanH.Mortality experience of insulation workers in the United States and Canada, 1943–1976. Ann. N.Y.Acad. Sci.330: 91–116, 1979.
GreenbergM.DaviesT. A. L.Mesothelioma register 1967–68. Br. J. Ind. Med.31: 91–104, 1974.
7.
SpurnyK. R.On the evaluation of fibrous particles in remote ambient air. Sci. Total Environ. 11: 1–40, 1979.
8.
SolomonS.The asbestos fallout at Johns-Manville. Fortune, May 7, 1979, pp. 196–206.
9.
Standard for exposure to asbestos dust. Federal Register37: 11318–22, June 7, 1972.
10.
Occupational exposure to asbestos/Notice of proposed rulemaking. Federal Register40: 47652–65, October 9, 1975.
11.
FinkleaJ.Evaluation of Data on Health Effects of Asbestos Exposure and Revised Recommended Numerical Environmental Limits. Memorandum from National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to Occupational Safety and Health Administration, December 15, 1976.
12.
National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants/Amendments to standards for asbestos and mercury. Federal Register40: 48292–311, October 14, 1975.
13.
Commercial and industrial use of asbestos fibers and consumer products containing asbestos. Federal Register44: 60056, October 17, 1979.
14.
Asbestos-form particles in drugs for parenteral injection. Federal Register40: 11865–69, March 14, 1975.
15.
Electrolytic diaphragm process for salt; revocation. Federal Register41, January 22, 1976.
16.
Consumer patching compounds and artificial emberizing materials (embers and ash) containing respirable free-form asbestos/Banned hazardous products. Federal Register42: 63354–65, December 15, 1977.
17.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Register Citations Pertaining to the Regulation of Asbestos. In-house report, April 1979.
18.
Asbestos-related Occupational Diseases. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Compensation, Health and Safety of the Committee on Education and Labor/House of Representatives. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1979.
19.
CastlemanB.How the asbestos industry avoids its victims. Business and Society Review, Fall 1979, pp. 33–38.
20.
CastlemanB.The export of hazardous factories to developing nations. Int. J. Health Serv. 9(4): 569–606, 1979.
21.
North American Congress on Latin America. Occupational health and asbestos. NACLA Report on the Americas, Volume 12. New York, 1978.
22.
Asbestos International Association. 8th Executive Committee Meeting, Agenda Item 6: Labelling. July 7, 1978.
23.
CliftonR. A.Asbestos. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1979.
24.
CrossA. A.Practical methods for protection of men working with asbestos materials in shipyards. In Safety and Health in Shipbuilding, pp. 93–101. International Labour Office, Geneva, 1972.
25.
Remarks by Milt Trosper/Johns-Manville Corporation. In Third Annual Industry-Government Conference, pp. 109–115. Asbestos Information Association, Arlington, Va., 1976.
26.
HarlessK. W.WatanabeS.RenzettiA. D.Jr.The acute effects of chrysotile asbestos exposure on lung function. Environ. Res.16: 360–372, 1978.
27.
Asbestos Exposures During the Cutting and Machining of Asbestos Cement Pipe; and Separate Report of Additional Studies. Report prepared for Asbestos-Cement Pipe Producers Association, Arlington, Va., 1977.
28.
McCabeL. J.MilletteJ. R.Health Effects and Prevalence of Asbestos Fibers in Drinking Water. Proceedings of American Water Works Association Conference, San Francisco, June 24–29, 1979.
29.
Environmental Defense Fund. Comments before Senate Subcommittee Studying Asbestos Pipes, Arlington, Va., September 18, 1979.
30.
Harmful asbestos found in units in Puerto Rico. Washington Post, June 18, 1977.
31.
NicholsonW. J.Chrysotile Asbestos in Air Samples Collected in Puerto Rico. Report to Consumer Product Safety Commission, March 16, 1978.
32.
Low-Cost Handmade Roof Sheets of Strong Fibre Reinforced Cement. Available from J. M. Parry and Associates, Ltd., Corngreaves Trading Estate, Overend Road, Warley, West Midlands B64 7DD, U.K. (associated with Intermediate Technology Development Group).
33.
European Economic Community. Study of the Economic and Social Committee on Health and Environmental Hazards Arising from the Use of Asbestos. Brussels, 1979.
34.
Asbestos and Asbestos Substitutes. International Metalworkers Federation Bulletin on Occupational Health and Safety No. 5, 1979.
35.
HarriesP. G.Asbestos dust concentrations in ship repairing; A practical approach to improving asbestos hygiene in naval dockyards. Ann. Occup. Hyg.14: 241, 1971.
36.
KalousekG. L.Calcium Silicate of Microcrystalline Lathlike Structure. United States Patent Number 2,547,127, April 3, 1951.
37.
BowlesO.The Asbestos Industry. Bulletin 552, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1955.
38.
New Insulation from Hungary. Asbestos 12, Sept. 1977.
39.
General Motors Programs on Non-Asbestos Friction Materials for Brake Systems. September 7, 1979.
40.
Table 3-1. Technological Feasibility and Economic Impact of OSHA Proposed Revision to the Asbestos Standard. Prepared by Weston Environmental Consultants-Designers for Asbestos Information Association, March 29, 1976.
41.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Alert on Asbestos Hazards of Brake Repair. Rockville, Md., August 8, 1975.
