The purpose of this article is to identify the factors affecting retention of college students with disabilities, examine the issues related to transition planning from secondary to postsecondary education, and explore the utility of the universal design concept to the retention of students. Further, promising practices will be shared along with implications for practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Public Law 101–336,42 U.S.C., 12101–12132.
2.
AstinA. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
3.
AstinA. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AuneE. (1991). A transition model for postsecondary-bound students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 177–187.
5.
AuneE. (2000). Career and academic advising. In BelchH. A. (Ed.), Serving students with disabilities (pp. 55–68). New directions for student services, No. 91.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
AuneE., & KroegerS. (1997). Career development of college students with disabilities: An interactional approach to defining the issues. Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), 344–356.
7.
BatesP. E.BronkemaJ.AmesT., & HessC. (1992). State-level interagency planning methods. In RuschF. R.DestefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsL. A., & SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life (pp. 115–129). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
8.
BelchH. A. (1994). Professionals with disabilities. In RyanD. and McCarthyM. (Eds.), A student affairs guide to the ADA & disability issues (pp. 125–146). NASPA Monograph Series No. 17.Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
9.
BenzM.LindstromL., & YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 509–529.
10.
BoulterL. T. (2002). Self-concept as a predictor of college freshman academic adjustment. [Electronic version]. College Student Journal, 38(2), 234–246.
BrinckerhoffL. C.ShawS. F., & McGuireJ. (1993). Promoting postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A handbook for practitioners. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
13.
BryantJ. A.BantaT. W., & BradleyJ. L. (1995). Assessment provides insight into the impact and effectiveness of campus recreation programs. NASPA Journal, 32(2), 153–160.
14.
BursuckW. D., & RoseE. (1991). Community college options for students with mild disabilities. In RuschF.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsL. A. & SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transitions from school to adult life (pp. 71–92). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
15.
ChickeringA. W., & ReisserL. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
ClaryG. K. (2001). Barriers to postsecondary education for rural students with disabilities: A Delphi study. (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 2987.
17.
deFurS. H.GetzelE. E., & TrossiK. (1996). Making the postsecondary education match: A role for transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 6, 231–241.
18.
DeLoachC. P. (1992). Career outcomes for college graduates with severe disabilities and sensory disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58(1), 57–63.
19.
WebsterDurham D. (2001). Giving voice to students with disabilities who have successfully transitioned to college: Or how LL Slim became “the best dam gimp on the planet.” (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 1796.
20.
WebsterDurham D.ClaryG., & GriffithP. L. (2001). Postsecondary education and career paths. In FlexerR. W.SimmonsT. J.LuftP., & BaerR. M. (Eds.). Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 439–473). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
DurlakC. M. (1992). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education: Training for self-determination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
22.
DurlakC. M.RoseE., & BursuckW. D. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education: Teaching the skills of self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(1), 51–59.
23.
EnrightM. S.ConyersL. M., & SzymanskiE. M. (1996). Career and career-related educational concerns of college students with disabilities. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75, 103–114.
24.
FoxJ. A.HatfieldJ. P., & CollinsT. C. (2003). Developing the curriculum transformation and disability workshop model. In HigbeeJ. L. (Ed.), Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.
25.
FreemanM. A.NussE. M., & BarrM. J. (1993). Meeting the need for staff diversity. In M. J. Barr & Associates, The handbook of student affairs administration (pp. 445–467). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
GajarA. H. (1998). Postsecondary education. In RuschF. R. & ChadseyJ. G. (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 383–405). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
27.
GartinB. C.RumrillP., & SerebriniR. (1996). The higher education transition model: Guidelines for facilitating college transition among college bound students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(1), 30–33.
28.
HallL. M., & BelchH. A. (2000). Setting the context: Reconsidering the principles of full participation and meaning access for students with disabilities. In BelchH. A. (Ed.), Serving students with disabilities (pp. 5–18). New directions for student services, No. 91.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Harris, L., & Associates, Inc. (1994). N.O.D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Author.
30.
Harris, L., & Associates, Inc. (2000). N.O.D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Author.
31.
HartmanR. C. (1993). Transition to higher education. In KroegerS. and SchuckJ. (Eds.), Responding to disability issues in student affairs (pp. 31–43). New directions for student services, No. 64.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
HEATH (1999). Facts you can use: Basis for exit from high school special education for students with disabilities, ages 17–21. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, HEATH Resource Center.
33.
HEATH (n.d.). Strategies for advising college students for postsecondary education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, HEATH Resource Center. Retrieved June 20, 2003 from www.heath.gwu.edu.
34.
HendersonC. (1999). College freshmen with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Council on Education/HEATH Resource Center.
35.
HendersonC. (2001). College freshmen with disabilities: A biennial statistical profile. Washington, DC: American Council on Education/HEATH Resource Center.
36.
HigbeeJ. L. (Ed.). (2003). Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.
37.
HitchingsW. E.LizzoD. A.RistowR.HorvathM.RetishP., & TannersA. (2001). The career development needs of college students with learning disabilities: In their own words. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(1), 8–17.
38.
HitchcockC.MeyerA.RoseD., & JacksonR. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17.
39.
HodgeB. M., & Preston-SabinJ. (1997). Accommodations—Or just good teaching?Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
40.
HodgkinsonH. (1985). All one system: Demographics of education, kindergarten through graduate school. Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Leadership.
41.
JanigaS. J., & CostenbaderV. (2002). The transition from high school to post-secondary education for students with learning disabilities: A survey of college service providers. [Electronic version]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 462–468.
42.
JohnsonD. (2000). Enhancing out-of-class opportunities for students with disabilities. In BelchH. A. (Ed.), Serving students with disabilities (pp. 41–53). New directions for student services, No. 91. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
JohnsonD.StockdillS.ChelbergG.HarbourW.EganE., & LorsungT. (1998). Engage: Disability access to student life. Final report. Minneapolis, MN: Disability Services, University of Minnesota.
44.
JonesS. R. (1996). Toward inclusive theory: Disability as social construction. NASPA Journal, 33(4), 347–354.
45.
KalivodaK. S., & HigbeeJ. L. (1998). Influencing faculty attitudes toward accommodating students with disabilities: A theoretical approach. The Learning Assistance Review, 3(2), 12–25.
46.
KroegerS., & SchuckJ. (1993). Moving ahead: Issues, recommendations, and conclusions. In KroegerS. & SchuckJ. (Eds.), Responding to disability issues in student affairs (pp. 103–110). New directions for student services, No. 64.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
KuhG. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123–155.
48.
Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
LazzaroJ. J. (1993). Adaptive technologies for learning and work environments. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
LevinsonE. M., & OhlerD. L. (1998). Transition from high school to college for students with learning disabilities: Needs, assessment, and services. The High School Journal, 82(1), 62–69.
52.
MangrumC. T., & StrichartS. S. (Eds.). (1998). College and the learning disabled student. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
53.
McGrathM., & BraunsteinA. (1997). The prediction of freshmen attrition: An examination of the importance of certain demographic, academic, financial, and social factors. College Student Journal, 31, 396–408.
54.
National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities (NICHY) (1993). Transition services in the IEP. NICHY Transition Summary, 3(1), 1–20.
55.
National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities (NICHY) (2002). General Information about disabilities: Disabilities that qualify infants, toddlers, children, and youth for services under the IDEA. Retrieved June 20, 2003 from www.nichcy.org/pubs/genresc/gr3.htm.
56.
OrkwisR. (1999). Curriculum access and universal design for learning. ERIC/OSEP Digest # E586. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED437767). Retrieved January 15, 2003.
57.
PascarellaE. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1). New York: Agathon.
58.
PascarellaE. T., & TerenziniP. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
PaulS. (2000). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature. [Electronic version]. College Student Journal, 34(2), 200–210.
60.
RendonL. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Towards a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19, 33–51.
61.
RoseD., & MeyerA. (2001). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology ejournal. Retrieved January 9, 2003 from www.cast.org.
62.
RumrillP. D. (1994). The “win-win” approach to Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Preparing college students with disabilities for career-entry placements after graduation. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 11(1), 15–19.
63.
SchlossbergN. K. (1989). Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community. In RobertsD. C. (Ed.), Designing campus activities to foster a sense of community. New directions for student services, No. 48 (pp. 5–15). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SchlossbergN. K.LynchA. Q., & ChickeringA. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65.
ScottS. S. (1996). Understanding colleges: An overview of college support services and programs available to clients from transition planning through graduation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 6, 217–230.
66.
SeigenthalerK. L. (1997). Health benefits of leisure. Parks and Recreation, 32(1), 24–31.
67.
SeymourE., & HunterA. (1998). Talking about disability: The education and work experiences of graduates and undergraduates with disabilities in science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Boulder, CO: The University of Colorado.
68.
ShearinA.RoesslerR., & SchrinerK. (1999). Evaluating the transition component in IEPs of secondary students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(2), 22–35.
69.
SilverP.BourkeA., & StrehornK. C. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47–51.
70.
SmithD. G. (1989). The challenge of diversity: Involvement or alienation in the academy? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
71.
StrangeC. C. (2000). Creating environments of ability. In BelchH. A. (Ed.), Serving students with disabilities (pp. 19–30). New directions for student services, No. 91.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
72.
StrangeC. C., & BanningJ. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus learning environments that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
74.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1999a). An institutional perspective on students with disabilities in postsecondary education. (NCES Publication No. 1999-046). Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center. Retrieved January 16, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
77.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1999b). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. (NCES Publication No. 1999-187). Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center. Retrieved January 16, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
78.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Descriptive summary of 1995–96 beginning postsecondary students: Six years later. (NCES Publication No. 2003-151). Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center. Retrieved January 16, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
79.
WagnerM. M., & BlackorbyJ. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6, 103–120.
80.
WestM.KregelJ.GetzelE., & ZhuM. (1993). Beyond section 504: Satisfaction and experiences of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptional Children, 59(5), 456–467.
81.
Willie-GregoryM.GrahamJ. W., & HughesC. (1995). Preparing students with learning disabilities for success in postsecondary education. Transition Linc, Spring, 1–7.
82.
WisemanR. L.EmryR. A., & MorganD. (1988). Predicting academic success for disabled students in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 28(3), 255–269.
83.
YukerH. E. (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer.
