Logical Criteria Applied in Writing and in Editing by Text Analysis

Abstract

The problems in technical communications are related more to logical structure than to language. Structure problems occur at document, section, paragraph, and sentence levels. Editing is most effective if it deals with structure first. Structure deficiencies can be detected by applying a range of logical analysis criteria to each text part: looking at the nature and quality of its content and the use of the appropriate discourse sequence. The nature of the content determines where the text part belongs in the section or elsewhere in the document structure. Sufficient definition eliminates vagueness. The correct discourse sequence determines the internal structure of the text part. Lists, headings, classifications, and organograms must comply with the laws of categorization and relevant logical criteria, including some arrived at by lateral thinking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

W. H.

, How to Produce and Communicate Structured Text, Technical Communication, 41, pp. 456–466, 1994.

Schauer Samuels

, Scientific Logic: A Reader-Oriented Approach to Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12, pp. 307–328, 1982.

Peterson

M. S.

, Scientific Thinking and Scientific Writing, Reinhold, New York, 1961.

Medawar

P. B.

, Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 75, 1969.

Wieland

, The Philosophy of Science: Its Possibilities and Limits, Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English), 20:8, pp. 617–702, 1981.

Körner

, Categorical Frameworks, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1974.

Schum

D. A.

, On the Marshalling of Evidence and the Structuring of Argument, in Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence: the Integration of Problem Solving Strategies, Brown

D. E.

and White

C. C.

III (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1990.

Wigmore

, The Science of Proof (3rd Edition), Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1937.

Penrose

, The Emperor's New Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989, or Vantage Series, Random House, London, 1990.

10.

Carney

T. F.

, Content Analysis; A Technique for Systematic Inference from Communications, B. T. Batsford, London, 1972.

11.

Cheney

and Schleicher

, Redesigning Technical Reports: A Rhetorical Approach for the Technical Editor, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 14, pp. 317–337, 1984.

12.

Abramson

H. I.

, Getting Information Retrieval to Work for You, Chemical Engineering Progress, 60:8, pp. 88–94, 1964.

13.

Mandersloot

W. G. B.

Douglas

E. M. B.

, and Spicer

, Thesaurus Control—The Selection, Grouping and Cross-Referencing of Terms for Inclusion in a Coordinate Index Word List, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 21:1, pp. 49–57, 1970.

14.

Hofstadter

D. R.

, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Harvester Press, Hassocks, Essex, 1979.

15.

Miller

G. A.

, The Science of Words, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1991.

16.

Mandersloot

W. G. B.

, Perception of Probability Statements; You Better Watch Your Tongue or Quill, Chemical Processing SA, 1:4, pp. 10–11, 1994.

17.

Heydenrych

M. D.

and Mandersloot

W. G. B.

, Practicalities of Curve Fitting, Proceedings of 7th National Meeting, S A Institution of Chemical Engineers, Johannesburg 1994, pp. 228–236.

18.

Mandersloot

W. G. B.

and Heydenrych

M. D.

, Practicalities of the Preparation of Graphics, Proceedings of 7th National Meeting, SAIChE, Johannesburg 1994, pp. 213–219.

19.

Bruckmann

C. G.

and Mandersloot

W. G. B.

, Writing Informative Reports on Investigations in Science and Engineering, (Original 1977) (3rd Edition), CSIR, Pretoria, 1988.

20.

Mandersloot

W. G. B.

, Communication Skills of Engineers Required in the Research and Industrial Environments, ChemSA, 9:10, pp. 185–187, 1983.