Much of what we know about students' drinking patterns and problems related to alcohol use is based on survey research. Although local and national survey data are important to alcohol-prevention projects, they do not sufficiently capture the complexity of the alcohol environment. Environmental prevention approaches to alcohol-related problems have been shown to be effective in community settings and researchers have begun to study and adapt such approaches for use on college campuses. Many environmental approaches require systematic scanning of the campus alcohol environment. This study assessed the inter-rater reliability of two environmental scanning tools (a newspaper content analysis form and a bulletin analysis form) designed to identify alcohol-related advertisements targeting college students. Inter-rater reliability for these forms varied across different rating categories and ranged from poor to excellent. Suggestions for future research are addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StrausR.BaconS., Drinking in College, Yale University Press, Binghampton, New York, 1953.
2.
WechslerH.LeeJ. E.KuoM.LeeH., College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem: Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study, Journal of American College Health, 48, pp. 199–210, 2000.
3.
PresleyC. A.LeichliterJ. S.MeilmanP. W., Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses: A Report to College Presidents, Monograph of The Core Institute, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 1998.
4.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G., National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997, Vol. II, NIH Publication No. 98-4346, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1998.
5.
WechslerH.DavenportA.DowdallG.MoeykensB.CastilloS., Health and Behavioral Consequences of Binge Drinking in College, Journal of the American Medical Association, 272:21, pp. 1672–1677, 1994.
6.
Associated Press, MIT Suspends Fraternity, American On-Line News, September 29, 1997.
7.
ClappJ. D.VoasR.SegarsL., Conceptual Model of the Alcohol Environment of College Students: Implications for Prevention and Evaluation, The Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 5:1, pp. 73–90, 2001.
8.
HolderH. D.SaltzR. F.GrubeJ. W.VoasR.GruenwaldJ. W.TrenoJ., A Community Prevention Trial to Reduce Alcohol-Involved Accidental Injury and Death: Overview, Addiction, Special Supplement, pp. 155–171, 1997.
9.
ClappJ. D.ShillingtonA. M., Environmental Predictors of Heavy Episodic Drinking Events, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27:2, pp. 301–313, 2001.
10.
DeJongW.Vince-WhitmanC.ColthurstT.CretellaM.GilbreathM.RosatiM.ZweigK., Environmental Management: A Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Alcohol and Other Drug Use on College Campuses, Monograph of the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention (unnumbered), 1998.
11.
RyanB.ColthurstT.SegarsL., College Alcohol Risk Assessment Guide, University of California San Diego Press, San Diego, 1994.
12.
HolderH.BloseJ., Reduction of Community Alcohol Problems: Computer Simulation Experiments in Three Countries, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, pp. 124–135, 1986.
13.
SaltzR., Research in Environmental and Community Strategies for the Prevention of Alcohol Problems, Contemporary Drug Problems, 15:1, pp. 67–81, 1988.
14.
ClappJ. D.ShillingtonA. M.SegarsL., Deconstructing Contexts of Heavy Episodic Drinking among College Students, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, pp. 139–154, 2000.
15.
ClappJ. D.McDonnellA. L., The Relationship of Alcohol Promotion and Peer Drinking Norms to Alcohol Problems reported by College Students, Journal of College Student Development, 41:1, pp. 19–26, 2000.
16.
ClappJ. D.ShillingtonA. M.HeidtL., Student Perceptions of Alcohol Promotion on Campus, Journal of Health Education, 31:5, pp. 252–256, 2000.
17.
WechslerH.LeeJ. E.KuoM.LeeH., College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem: Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study, Journal of American College Health, 48, pp. 199–210, 2000.
18.
GebhardtT.KaphingstK.DeJongW., A Campus-Community Coalition to Control Alcohol-Related Problems Off Campus: An Environmental Management Case Study, College Health, 48, pp. 211–215, 2000.
19.
KronickJ. C.SilverS., Using the Computer for Content Analysis, Quanitative Methods in Social Work, 10, pp. 41–62, 1992.
20.
HolstiO. R., Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1969.
21.
AnastasJ. W., Research Design for Social Work and the Human Services, Columbia University Press, New York, 1999.
22.
ReidW.Bailey-DempseyC., Content Analysis in Design and Development, Research on Social Work Practice, 4, pp. 101–114, 1994.
23.
BerkR., Generalizability of Behavioral Observations: A Clarification of Interobserver Agreement and Interobserver Reliability, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 18, pp. 460–472, 1979.
24.
KirkS. A.KutchinsH., The Selling of DSM, The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry, 1992.
25.
PedhazurE.SchmelkinL., Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Lawrence/Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1991.
26.
ClappJ. D.NovakM., Community Specific Case Studies, a panel presentation at Alcohol Beverage Control: Partnerships for Prevention, an invitational symposium sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education, San Diego, California, pp. 7–21, 2000.
