Interviews of 240 welfare clients as they departed from welfare offices in four U.S. cities indicate a marked tendency for older clients to be more satisfied than younger clients with treatment and services received in just-completed bureaucratic encounters. Other studies have shown similar tendencies. It is speculated that the phenomenon is a combination of pro-elderly discrimination on the part of bureaucrats and a tendency for older Americans subjectively to perceive their experiences with officialdom in a more favorable light.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KahnR. L.GutekB. A.BartonE., and KatzD., Americans Love Then-Bureaucrats, Psychology Today, 9, pp. 66–71, June, 1975.
2.
GoodsellC. T., Conflicting Perceptions of Welfare Bureaucracy, Social Casework, 61, pp. 354–360, 1980.
3.
NelsonB. J., Client Evaluation of Social Programs, GoodsellC. T., (ed.), The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, forthcoming, 1981.
4.
NelsonB. J., Clients and Bureaucracies: Applicant Evaluations of Public Human Service and Benefit Programs, paper delivered to American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 1979, duplicated.
5.
KatzD.GutekB. A.KahnR. L., and BartonE., Bureaucratic Encounters: A Pilot Study in the Evaluation of Government Services, Institute for Social Research, University of Michican, Ann Arbor, 1975.
6.
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Quality of Service Measurement: Program and Instrumentation, Report submitted under contract to Social Security Administration, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, November 24, 1975, duplicated.
7.
Technical Assistance Research Programs, Inc., Washington, D.C., National Survey of the Complaint-Handling Procedures Used by Consumers, Report submitted under contract to Office of Consumer Affairs, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, December, 1976, duplicated.
8.
GoodsellC. T., Looking Once Again at Human Service Bureaucracy, Journal of Politics, 43, 1981, forthcoming.
9.
BengtsonV. L. and CutlerN. E., Generations and Intergenerational Relations: Perspectives on Age Groups and Social Change, BinstockR. H. and ShanasE., (eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 130–159, 1976.
10.
HudsonR. B. and BinstockR. H., Political Systems and Aging, BinstockR. H. and ShanasE., (eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, Van Nostrand Neinhold, New York, pp. 369–400, 1976.
11.
CutlerN. E. and BengsonV. L., Age and Political Alientation: Maturation, Generation and Period Effects, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 4:5, pp. 160–186, 1974.
12.
GlennN. D., Aging and Conservatism, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 4:5, pp. 160–186, 1974.
