The practice of torture in Latin America is fundamentally an activity of the state and part of a larger program of repression. In this article, the author analyzes, in general, the psychology of the methods and practice of torture, and, in particular, the psychological defenses likely activated by the torturer when confronting the victim. The contradictions in the relationship of torturer to tortured are seen in the light of larger social contradictions within the scheme of domination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PetersE.Torture. Basil Blackwell, London, 1985.
2.
PelaezS. MartinezLa Patria del criollo, ensayo de interpretation colonial Guatemalteca, pp. 127, 409. Editorial Universitaria, Guatemala, 1971.
3.
CrozierB.A Theory of Conflict. Scribner, New York, 1975.
4.
JonesG. E.On the permissibility of torture. J. Med. Ethics6: 11–15, 1980.
5.
LiraE.Psicoterapia y represion Politico. Siglo XXI, Mexico, D.F., 1985.
6.
Amnesty International. Torture in the Eighties. Amnesty International, London, 1984.
7.
ShumakerE.Argentina and Democracy. Foreign Affairs62(5): 1071–1095, Summer 1984.
8.
PeraltaG. AguileraDeterioro y Crisis de las Formas de Domination Politico en Centro–america. Programa Centroamericano De Ciencias Sociales–CSUCA–Centro Metodista, Alajuela, Costa Rica, 1982.
9.
GibsonJ. T.Haritos-FatourosM.The education of a torturer. Psychology Today20(11): 50–58, 1986.
10.
VictorJ.Confesiones de un torturador. Editorial Laia, SA Barcelona, 1981.
11.
Arns, Paulo-Euaristo. Brazil: Nunca Mais. Voces Brazil Petropolis, São Paulo, 1985.
12.
Bendfeldt-ZachrissonF.State (political) torture: Some general, psychological and particular aspects. Int. J. Health Serv. 15(2): 339–349, 1985.
13.
Name retained. Personal communication, 1981.
14.
MurtonT.Prison doctors. In Human Perspectives in Medical Ethics, edited by VisscherM., p. 249. Prometheus, Buffalo, 1972.
15.
NarinA.Behind the death squads. The Progressive, May 1984, pp. 20–29.
16.
HawardL. R. C.Investigations of torture allegations by the forensic psychologists. J. Forensic Sci. Soc.14: 299, 1974.
17.
GrassianS.Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. Am. J. Psychiatry140(11): 1450–1454, 1983.
18.
WatsonP.Guerra Persona y Destruction: Usos Militares de la Psiquiatria y Psicologia, p. 169. Editorial Nueva Imagen, Mexico, D.F., 1982.
19.
Anonymous. Building a better thumbscrew. New Scientist, July 19, 1973, pp. 138–141.
20.
JadresicA.Doctors and torture: An experience as a prisoner. J. Med. Ethics6(3): 124–128, 1980.
21.
Amnesty International. Workshop on Human Rights: Report and Recommendations, p. 8. Amnesty International, London, 1976.
22.
Amnesty International. Mental Health Aspects of Political Imprisonment in Uruguay, p. 5. Amnesty International, London, 1983.
23.
NegriV.Mental Health Consequences of Political Repression in Latin America. Paper presented at the 113th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., November 17–21, 1985.
24.
TimermanJ.Prisoner' Without a Name, Cell Without a Number, p. 54. Knopf, New York, 1981.
25.
DassinJ.Time up for torturers? A human dilemma for Brazil. Nacla2(20): 36–58, 1986.
26.
Chile is killing people with drugs. The Observer, October 26, 1985.
27.
Latin American Bureau. Uruguay: Generals Rule, Latin American Bureau Special Brief. London, 1980.
28.
Name retained. Personal communication, 1985.
29.
Guatemalan Human Rights Commission. Human Rights in Guatemala. Mexico, D.F., 1985.
