The gender-related effects of masculinity, femininity, and perceiving technology to be masculinized upon computer anxiety in undergraduates is investigated in addition to the effect of significant others who use computers and the introducer of the technology. The results demonstrate a sex difference, females reporting higher levels of computer anxiety than males. For females, computer anxiety negatively correlated with masculinity, while femininity positively correlated with computer anxiety for males. Sixty-four percent of females agreed that computing was a male activity and that men were better at computing than women. Females who agreed with this latter statement were significantly less computer anxious than females who did not agree with this statement. Additionally, over 40 percent of the variance in female computer anxiety was accounted for by age and having a male friend who used a computer, suggesting that females use males for computer-related support as a strategy to reduce anxiety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MoldafskyN. I. and KwonI. W., Attributes Affecting Computer Aided Decision Making—A Literature Survey, Computers in Human Behaviour, 10: 3, pp. 299–323, 1994.
2.
ScottC. and RockwellS., The Effect of Communication, Writing and Technology Apprehension on Likelihood to Use New Communication Technologies, Communication Education, 46: 1, pp. 44–62, 1997.
3.
MaharD.HendersonR., and DeaneF., The Effects of Computer Anxiety, State Anxiety and Computer Experience on Users Performance of Computer Based Tasks, Personality and Individual Difference, 22: 5, pp. 683–692, 1997.
4.
BrosnanM. and DavidsonM., Computerphobia: Is it a Particularly Female Phenomenon?The Psychologist, 7: 2, pp. 73–78, 1994.
5.
MaurerM. M., Computer Anxiety Correlates and What They Tell Us: A Literature Review, Computers in Human Behaviour, 10: 3, pp. 369–376, 1994.
6.
WhitelyB., Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis, Computers in Human Behaviour, 13: 1, pp. 1–22, 1997.
7.
WhitelyB., Gender Differences in Computer Related Attitudes. It Depends on What You Ask, Computers in Human Behaviour, 12: 2, pp. 275–289, 1996.
8.
CohenB. A. and WaughG. W., Assessing Computer Anxiety, Psychological Reports, 65, pp. 735–738, 1989.
9.
GressardC. P. and LoydB. H., An Investigation on the Effects of Math Anxiety and Sex on Computer Attitudes, School Science and Mathematics, 87, pp. 125–135, 1987.
10.
PopovichP. M.HydeK. R.ZakrajsekT., and BlumerC., The Development of the Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, pp. 261–269, 1987.
11.
BrosnanM. and DavidsonM., Psychological Gender Issues in Computing, Journal of Gender, Work and Organization, 3: 1, pp. 13–25, 1996.
12.
ColleyA.GaleM., and HarrisT., Effects of Gender Role Identity and Experience on Computer Attitude Components, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10: 2, pp. 129–137, 1994.
13.
RosenL. D.SearsD. C., and WeilM. M., Computerphobia, Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 19, pp. 167–179, 1987.
14.
OgletreeS. M. and WilliamsS. W., Sex and Sex-Typing Effects on Computer Attitudes and Aptitude, Sex Roles, 23, pp. 703–712, 1990.
15.
BernS. L., The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, pp. 155–162, 1974.
16.
BernS. L., Bern Sex Role Inventory Professional Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1981.
17.
BernS. L., The Lenses of Gender, Yale University Press, 1993.
18.
WareM. and StuckM., Sex Role Messages vis-a-vis a Microcomputer Use: A Look at the Pictures, Sex Roles, 13, pp. 205–214, 1985.
19.
ChiversG., Information Technology—Girls and Education: A Cross-Cultural Review, in Women and Information Technology, DavidsonM. J. and CooperC. L. (eds.), John Wiley, London, pp. 13–32, 1987.
20.
HawkinsJ., Computers and Girls: Rethinking the Issues, Sex Roles, 13, pp. 193–203, 1985.
21.
CollisB., Sex-Related Differences in Attitudes toward Computers: Implications and Counsellors, School Counsellor, 33: 2, pp. 120–130, 1985.
22.
WilderG.MacKieD., and CooperJ., Gender and Computers: Two Surveys of Computer-Related Attitudes, Sex Roles, 13: 3/4, pp. 215–228, 1985.
23.
ArcherJ. and MacRaeM., Gender Perceptions of School Subjects among 10–11 Year Olds, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, pp. 99–103, 1991.
24.
WilliamsS.OgletreeS.WoodburnW., and RaffeldP., Gender Roles, Computer Attitudes and Dyadic Computer Interaction Performance in College Students, Sex Roles, 29: 7/8, pp. 515–525, 1993.
25.
SiannA.MacLeodH.GlissovP., and DumdellA., The Effect of Computer Use on Gender Differences in Attitudes towards Computers, Computers in Education, 14: 2, pp. 183–191, 1990.
26.
TodmanJ. and DickG., Primary Children and Teachers Attitudes to Computers, Computers in Education, 20, pp. 199–203, 1993.
27.
LageE., Boys, Girls and Microcomputing, European Journal of Psychology and Education, 6, pp. 29–44, 1991.
28.
LevinT. and GordonC., Effect of Gender and Computer Experience on Attitudes toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5: 1, pp. 69–88, 1989.
29.
MartinezM. and MeadN., Computer Experience: The First National Assessment, Education Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey, 1988.
30.
WeilM.RosenL., and WagultaS., The Etiology of Computerphobia, Computers in Human Behaviour, 6, pp. 361–379, 1990.
31.
FletcherW. and DeedsJ., Computer Anxiety and Other Factors Preventing Computer Use among United States Secondary Agricultural Educators, Journal of Agricultural Education, 35: 2, pp. 16–21, 1994.
32.
GordonH., Analysis of the Computer Anxiety Levels of Secondary Technical Education Teachers in West Virginia, Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 15: 1, pp. 21–29, 1995.
33.
RosenL. and WeilM., Computer Availability, Computer Experience and Technophobia among Public School Teachers, Computers in Human Behaviour, 11: 1, pp. 9–31, 1995.
34.
BrosnanM., The Fourth “R”: Are Teachers Hindering Computer Literacy in School Children?Educational Review, 21: 1, pp. 29–37, 1997.
35.
RadfordJ. and HoldstockL., Does Psychology Need More Boy Appeal?The Psychologist, 8: 1, pp. 21–24, 1995.
36.
RadfordJ. and HoldstockL., The Growth of Psychology, The Psychologist, 9: 12, pp. 548–550, 1996.
37.
GilroyF. and DesaiH., Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race and Age, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, pp. 711–719, 1986.
38.
LeslieF., The Relationship between Computer Related Attitudes and Gender Stereotyping of Computer Use, Computers and Education, 22: 4, pp. 283–289, 1994.
39.
MarcoulidesG., The Computer Anxiety Scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, pp. 733–739, 1985.
40.
HuffC. and CooperJ., Sex Bias in Educational Software: The Effects of Designers' Stereotypes on the Software They Design, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, pp. 519–532, 1997.
41.
CooperJ. and StoneJ., Gender, Computer Assisted Learning and Anxiety: With a Little Help from a Friend, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15: 1, pp. 67–91, 1996.
42.
ArtisJ.AshmanH., and RobertsA., Curricular Contexts and Significance of Computer-Based Tasks, paper presented at the British Psychological Conference Education Section Annual Conference, Wycombe, 1996.
43.
SpenceJ. and HelmreichR., Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates and Antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas, 1978.
44.
GistM.SchwoererC., and RosenB., Effects of Alternative Training Methods on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Computer Software Training, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 6, pp. 884–891, 1989.
45.
DyckJ. and SmitherJ., Age Differences in Computer Anxiety: The Role of Computer Experience, Gender and Education, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10: 3, pp. 239–248, 1994.
46.
WilliamsS.OgletreeS.WoodburnW., and RaffeldP., Gender Roles, Computer Attitudes and Dyadic Computer Interaction Performance in College Students, Sex Roles, 29: 7/8, pp. 515–525, 1993.
47.
CulleyL., Girls, Boys and Computers, Educational Studies, 14: 1, pp. 3–8, 1988.
