Abstract
Using Philip Roth's writings as a basis, the present study examines the relationship between self-analysis and the writing of fiction. Insofar as Roth's novels depend heavily on introspective data, as well as the recreation of relationships and events taken from the author's direct experience, they provide valuable data concerning the links between autobiography and directed fantasy. The limitations of the confessional novel are discussed with reference to the fate of narrative and empathic characterization. Also examined are the effects of the writer's psychological conflicts on the treatment of fictional relationships and the resolution of fictional “problems”. The question of the generalizabilty and utility of the author's self-insights is raised, noting that Roth's protagonists achieve only partial insights due to defensiveness. The significance of Roth's treatment of romantic love is analyzed in the light of his difficulties in creating characters capable of idealizing love objects. These difficulties are seen in the broader context of Roth's satirical outlook, which tends toward the de-idealization of love object and of society in general. The manic qualities of Roth's satire are interpreted as depression-based, involving a sense of loss in relation to devalued love objects and their associated security system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
