Confinement and Ego Regression: Some Consequences of Enforced Passivity

Abstract

This paper suggests a relationship between the enforced passivity of confinement and certain peculiarities of behavior seen among both hospitalized patients and other incarcerated groups such as prisoners. It is proposed that confinement has deleterious effects on certain ego functions. Finally, it is recommended that steps may be taken, based upon a knowledge of the psychological issues involved, which may lessen regression during confinement and facilitate return to normal mental functioning upon release from confinement.

Clinical material illustrating effects of confinement is drawn from the author's experiences as a psychiatrist in the federal prisons and juvenile courts and from observations of patients hospitalized for physical and mental disorders.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Greenacre

: Trauma, Growth and Personality. New York, W. W. Norton, 1952, p 104.

Watson

: Psychology from the Standpoint of the Behaviorist. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1919, p 200.

Freud

: The Problem of Anxiety. New York, W. W. Norton, 1936, pp 96–126.

Spitz

: The First Year of Life. New York, International Universities Press, 1965.

Bowlby

: Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1951.

Provence

Lipton

: Infants in Institutions. New York, International Universities Press, 1962, pp 150–58.

Krystal

Petty

: The psychological work of normal convalescence. Psychosomatics 2: 366–72, 1971.