In recent years, a new pedagogical model has arisen in the teaching of technical writing, one of “technical writing as enculturation.” A close examination of this model reveals not only its relation to the workaday world of modern technology but also its roots in classical, especially Ciceronian, rhetoric. Our awareness that the model is both modern and classical may, in fact, enable us to carry its amplification and refinement even further.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerP. L. and LuckmannT., The Social Construction of Reality, Doubleday, New York, 1967.
2.
HarreR., Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
3.
ShotterJ., Social Accountability and Selfhood, Blackwell, Oxford, England, 1984.
4.
KuhnT. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
5.
KuhnT. S., The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.
6.
CoulterJ., The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Linguistic Philosophy, Rowman, Totowa, New Jersey, 1979.
7.
CoulterJ., Rethinking Cognitive Theory, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1983.
8.
GeertzC., The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York, 1973.
9.
GeertzC., Local Knowledge, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
10.
GeertzC., Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1988.
11.
MillerC. R.A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40:6, pp. 610–617, 1979.
12.
DobrinD. N., What's Technical about Technical Writing: in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V.BrockmannR. J., and MillerC. R. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, pp. 227–250, 1983.
13.
SmithD. B.Axioms for English in a Technical Age, College English, 48:6, pp. 567–579, 1986.
14.
SloaneT. O., Reinventing inventio, College English, 51:5, pp. 461–473, 1989.
15.
StreuverN., Lorenzo Valla: Humanist Rhetoric and the Critique of the Classical Languages of Morality, in Renaissance Eloquence, MurphyJ. J. (ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 191–206, 1983.
16.
Cicero, De oratore, SuttonE. W. and RackhamH. (trans.), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1929. Cited in the text by book, chapter, and section.
17.
Cicero, Topica, HubbellH. M. (trans.), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1949.
18.
KnoblauchC. H. and BrannonL., Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing, Boynton/Cook, Upper Montclair, New Jersey, 1984.
19.
RortyR., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1982.
20.
Cicero, Orator, HubbellH. M. (trans.), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1939. Cited in the text by chapter and section.
21.
ShriverK. A.Document Design from 1980 to 1989: Challenges That Remain, Technical Communications, 36:4, pp. 316–331, 1989.
22.
FelkerD. B. (ed.), Document Design: A Relevant Review of the Literature, American Institute for Research, Washington, D.C., 1980.
23.
EnosT.Aristotle, Inc.: Corporate Structure in the Technical Communications Course, The Technical Writing Teacher, 13:1, pp. 71–77, 1986.
24.
BrummettB.Some Implications of “Process” or “Intersubjectivity”: Postmodern Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 9:1, pp. 21–51, 1976.
25.
KennedyG. A., The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World: 300B.C.-A.D. 300, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1972.
26.
GergenK. J., Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.
27.
SmithD. B.Teaching Anthropology Is a Good Way to Teach Writing, College Composition and Communication, 28:3, pp. 251–256, 1977.
28.
BerlinJ.Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class, College English, 50:5, pp. 477–494, 1988.
29.
Cicero, De partitione oratorio, RackmanH. (trans.), Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1942. Cited in the text by chapter and section.
30.
SmithR. E.IIIHymes, Rorty, and the Social-Rhetorical Construction of Meaning, College English, 54:2, 1992.
31.
SmithR. E.IIIFunctional Teaching: Using Obsolescence to Teach Definition, JTWC21:2, 1991.
32.
SmithR. E.IIIReconsidering Richard Porty, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 19:1, 1989.
