Understanding the Connection between Cognitive Tool Use and Cognitive Processes as Used by Sixth Graders in a Problem-Based Hypermedia Learning Environment

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the connection between sixth graders' cognitive tool use and the cognitive processes they engage in as they solve a complex problem in a hypermedia learning environment. The three research questions were: 1) Which cognitive tools are used for which cognitive processes? 2) Is there a relationship between the extent of students' engagement in cognitive processing and their cognitive tool use? and 3) Are there any differences in cognitive tool use and performance scores between students who are engaged in different patterns of cognitive processing? The findings showed that different cognitive tools were used for different cognitive processes, and the degree of engagement in cognitive processing was positively related to the frequency of tool use. These results indicate that there is a connection between cognitive tool use and cognitive processing. In addition, tool use patterns reflected different characteristics of the learners (information processing versus metacognition oriented). Students who were more metacognitively oriented were more consistent in their tool selection, while students who were more information processing oriented were more action oriented in performing the tasks. However, there was no difference in the diversity of tool use or the performance scores between the two groups of students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

L. W.

Krathwohl

D. R.

Airasian

P. W.

Cruikshank

K. A.

Mayer

R. E.

Pintrich

P. R.

Raths

Wittrock

M. C.

(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Bera

Liu

(in press). Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior.

Bransford

J. D.

Brown

A. L.

Cocking

R. R.

(Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Bransford

J. D.

Stein

B. S.

(1984). The IDEAL Problem Solver. New York: W. H. Feeman and Company.

Corderoy

Harper

Hedberg

(2003). Designing simulations that support improved learning outcomes in water catchment management. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, Honolulu, HI, pp. 2767–2775.

Harper

Hedberg

Corderoy

Wright

(2000). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications. In Lajoie

P. S.

(Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: No more walls (pp. 227–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Jonassen

D. H.

(1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Jonassen

D. H.

(2000). Toward a meta-theory of problem-solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 63–85.

Jonassen

D. H.

(2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 362–381.

10.

Jonassen

D. H.

Reeves

T. C.

(1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In Jonassen

D. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.

11.

Kozma

R. B.

(1987). The implications of cognitive psychology for computer-based learning tools. Educational Technology, 27, 20–25.

12.

Lajoie

S. P.

(1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In Lajoie

S. P.

Derry

S. J.

(Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

13.

Land

S. M.

Hannafin

M. J.

(2000). Student-centered learning environments. In Jonassen

D. H.

Land

S. M.

(Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.

Liu

(2004). Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 357–379.

15.

Liu

Bera

(2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5–21.

16.

Liu

Williams

Pedersen

(2002). Alien Rescue: A problem-based hypermedia learning environment for middle school Science. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 255–270.

17.

Mayer

R. E.

(1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem-solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49–63.

18.

Mayer

R. E.

Wittrock

M. C.

(1996) Problem-solving transfer. In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York: Macmillan.

19.

Oliver

Hannafin

M. J.

(2000). Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem-solving. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 75–92.

20.

Pea

R. D.

(1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20, 167–182.

21.

Salomon

Perkins

D. N.

Globerson

(1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.

22.

Stevens

(1997). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

23.

Tennyson

R. D.

Breuer

(2002). Improving problem-solving and creativity through use of complex-dynamic simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 650–668.

24.

Yang

S. C.

(2002). Multidimensional taxonomy of learners' cognitive processing in discourse synthesis with hypermedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 37–68.

25.

Williams

D. C.

(1999). Hypermedia-supported authentic learning environments (HALE): Examination of tools and features which can support students learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX.

26.

Zhang

(1997). The nature of external representation in problem-solving. Cognitive Science, 21, 179–217.

27.

Zhang

Norman

D. A.

(1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.