The goal of this study was to reduce the inhibitory deficit on the elderly by creating “optimizing conditions” in a categorization task. It was hypothesized that increasing the number of relevant pieces of information would reduce the difficulty associated with processing irrelevant information on a categorization task, since the number of relevant solutions to solve the problem would increase, while the total number of pieces of information to be processed would remain the same. This hypothesis was tested on 27 young adults and 30 elderly people using a task requiring the matching of a stimulus figure to one of the two response figures having one or more attributes in common with the stimulus. In line with previous findings, the results indicated an age-related inhibitory decline. However, consistent with the hypothesis, as the number of relevant attributes increased, the performance of elderly people improved and response times decreased, supporting the notion of latent cognitive resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArenbergD. (1982). Changes with age in problem solving. In CraikF. I. M. & TrehubS. (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 221–235). New York: Plenum Press.
2.
ArenbergD. (1988). Analysis and synthesis in problem solving and aging. In HoweM. L. & BrainerdC. J. (Eds.), Cognitive development in adulthood: Progress in cognitive developmental research (pp. 161–183). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
BaltesP. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.
4.
BaltesP. B. (1993). The aging mind: Potentials and limits. The Gerontologist, 33, 580–594.
5.
BaltesP. B., & KlieglR. (1992). Further testing of limits of cognitive plasticity: Negative age differences in a mnemonic skill are robust. Developmental Psychology, 28, 121–125.
6.
BroadbentD. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50, 253–290.
7.
BrooksJ. O.FriedmanL.PearmanA. M.GrayC., & YesavageJ. A. (1999). Mnemonic training in older adults: Effects of age, length of training, and type of cognitive pretraining. International Psychogeriatrics, 11, 75–84.
8.
ClayH. M. (1954). Changes of performance with age on tasks of varying complexity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 7–13.
9.
ClaytonV. P., & OvertonW. F. (1973). The role of formal operational thought in the aging process. Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Miami, FL.
10.
CohenG. (1981). Inferential reasoning in old age. Cognition, 9, 59–72.
11.
CollinsK.LuszczM.LawsonM., & KeevesJ. (1997). Everyday problem solving in elderly women: Contributions of residence, perceived control, and age. The Gerontologist, 37, 293–302.
12.
DempsterF. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognition development and aging. Developmental Review, 72, 45–75.
13.
DenneyN. W. (1984). A model of cognitive development across the life span. Developmental Review4, 171–191.
14.
DenneyN. W.PearceK. A., & PalmerA. M. (1982). A developmental study of adults' performance on traditional and practical problem-solving tasks. Experimental Aging Research, 8, 115–118.
15.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. F., & McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
16.
FontaineR., & PennequinV. (2000). Effect of aging on inferential reasoning about class inclusion hierarchies. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 19, p. 453.
17.
HartleyA. A., & AndersonJ. W. (1986). Instruction, induction, generation and evaluation of strategies for solving search problems. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 650–658.
18.
HasherL., & ZacksR. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension and aging: A review and a new view. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
HoyerW. J.RebokG. W., & SvedS. M. (1979). Effects of varying irrelevant information on adult age differences in problem solving. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 553–560.
20.
HultschD. F.HammerM., & SmallB. J. (1993). Age differences in cognitive performance in later life: Relationships to self-reported health and activity life style. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 1–11.
21.
JuhelJ.SalicéG., & AuffrayC. (2000). Fonctionnement exécutif et inhibition cognitive: étude différentielle chez la personne âgé [Functioning of central executive and cognitive inhibition: A differential study on old people]. In BrouilletD. & SyssauA. (Eds.), Le viellissement cognitif (pp. 104–117). Bruxelles, France: DeBoeck.
22.
KlieglR., & BaltesP. B. (1987). Theory-guided analysis of mechanisms of development and aging mechanisms through testing-the-limits and research on expertise. In SchoolerC. & SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Cognitive functioning and social structure over the life course (pp. 95–119). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23.
LernerR. M. (1984). On the nature of human plasticity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
NeillW. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444–450.
25.
PapaliaD. E. (1972). The status of several conservation abilities across the life-span, Human Development, 15, 229–243.
26.
ParasuramanR.GreenwoodP. M.HaxbyJ. V., & GradyC. L. (1992). Visuospatial attention in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Brain, 115, 711–733.
27.
PennequinV., & FontaineR. (2001). Training for older adults: The example of class inclusion, Adultspan Journal, 2, 68–88.
28.
PennequinV.FontaineR., & VidegrainA. (in press). Evolution des capacités d'inhibition et d'inclusion de classes: Une approche développementale [Evolution of inhibition and class inclusion capacities: A developmental approach]. Revue de Neuropsychologie.
29.
PosnerM. I., & SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signal. In RabittP. & DornicS. (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 55–85). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
SalthouseT. A.MitchellD. R. D.SkovroneckE., & BabcokR. L. (1989). Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 507–516.
31.
SchaieK. W. (1989). Individual differences in rate of cognitive change in adulthood. In BengtsonV. L. & SchaieK. W. (Eds.), The course of later life: Research and reflections. New York: Springer.
32.
SieglerR. S., & LemaireP. (1997). Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71–92.
33.
StaudingerU. M.MarsiskeM., & BaltesP. B. (1993). Resilience and levels of reserve capacity in later adulthood: Perspectives from life-span theory. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 541–566.
34.
Van der HieijdenA. H. C. (1981). Short term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35.
WillisS. L. (1987). Cognitive training and everyday competence. In SchaieK. W. (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and pediatrics (vol. 7, pp. 159–188). New York: Springer.
36.
ZacksR., & HasherL. (1997). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 274–283.
