Surveys at a midwestern middle school showed that most students have much greater access to computer technology than previously predicted, including such sophisticated accessories as graphics packages, scanners, fax, and modems for e-mail. Both students and teachers reported the need for learning and using computer technology the way adults use it in the workplace. While students want the hardware and software to produce original, professional-looking documents, teachers want both traditional television hookups and cutting-edge instructional tools. The ongoing controversy about computer placement in labs versus classrooms appears to be a function of shortage within a technology vision balancing equity and efficiency. Teachers are virtually unanimous in wanting all teachers to have at least one computer in their classrooms while concurring in the need for grouped computers for instruction in some classrooms. Reliable, empirical information about students' and teachers' exposure to and application of computer technology outside of schools is essential when school personnel struggle with the decision-making that accompanies the spread of technology in education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustinT.CaracheoF.DavisR.HenaoO. A.MorganB.MoursundD.OwensJ., and StandleyM., The Technology Advisory Council: A Vehicle for Improving Our Schools, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Oregon, 1993.
2.
DoughtyP.LeuD.SpuchesC., and YonaiB., Developing Classroom-Based Data for Technology Decisions: Assisting the Implementation of Oswego's Vision for the Use of Technology, District-Wide Summary Report, Oswego City School District, New York, 1995.
3.
SteinhausK. A., Educational Technology: Kindergarten through Twelfth Grade, New Mexico Department of Education, Santa Fe, 1991.
4.
BoschK. A., Is There a Computer Crisis in the Classroom?Schools-in-the Middle, 2: 4, pp. 7–9, 1993.
5.
EastmanS. T., A Qualitative Study of Computers and Printouts in the Classroom, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34: 1, pp. 208–222, 1986.
6.
EastmanS. T. and HollingsworthH. L., Writing with Computers, in Write More, Learn More: Writing across the Curriculum, FryeJ. and HollingsworthH. L. (eds.), Phi Delta Kappa, Bloomington, Indiana, pp. A2–A42, 1991.
ShadeD. D., Are You Ready to Teach Young Children in the 21st Century?Early Childhood Education Journal, 24: 1, pp. 43–44, 1996.
9.
ReillyB., New Technologies, New Literacies, New Problems, in Education and Technology: Reflections on a Decade of Experience in the Classroom, FisherCharles (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 120–137, 1996.
10.
CleaverJ., Class Acts: How Three Schools Use New Technology to Empower Students, Connect-Time, 1(10), Herald-Times newspaper, Bloomington, Indiana, pp. 6–7, August 1997.
11.
DruinA. and SolomonC., Designing Multimedia Environments for Children, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996.
12.
PlatiT., Multimedia Technology: Second Wave Impacts All Learners, Macintosh Special Issue, T.H.E. Journal, pp. 55–58, 1991.
13.
DowningC. E. and RathG. J., The Internet as Intranet: Moving toward the Electronic Classroom, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25: 3, pp. 273–291, 1996–97.
14.
ScroggsS., Turning Visions into Reality, T.H.E. Journal, 22: 4, pp. 99–101, November 1994.
15.
JostK. L., Creating a Learning Environment for Teachers, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 17, Anaheim, California, October 1995.
16.
HopeW. G., Why Technology has not Realized Its Potential in Schools: A Perspective, American Secondary Education, 24: 4, pp. 2–9, June 1997.
17.
WallisC., The Learning Revolution, Time (Special Issue), pp. 49–51, Spring 1995.
18.
HollingsworthH. L. and EastmanS. T., Teaching Writing with Computers, Indiana Department of Education, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1989.
19.
HoffmanB., Managing the Information Revolution: Planning the Integration of School Technology, National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 80: 582, pp. 89–98, October 1996.
20.
DublinP.PressmanH., and WoldmanE. J., Integrating Computers in Your Classroom: Elementary Language Arts, HarperCollins, New York, 1994.
21.
MuirM., Putting Computer Projects at the Heart of the Curriculum, Educational Leadership, 51: 7, pp. 30–32, 1994.
22.
SalomonG., The Computer Lab: A Bad Idea Now Sanctified, Educational Technology, 50: 10, pp. 50–52, October 1990.
23.
WhiteheadB. M., Classroom Computers: A New Approach, Principal, 73: 1, pp. 34–36, 1993.
24.
SchultzC. W. and Higginbotham-WheatN., Practitioners' Perspectives of Computers in the Classroom, in Problems and Promises of Computer-Based Training, ShlechterT. M. (ed.), Ablex, Norward, New Jersey, pp. 199–214, 1991.
25.
WilsonB. G.HamiltonR.TeslowJ. L., and CyrT., Evaluating the Impact of Technology at Peakview Elementary School: The Full Report, Cherry Creek Schools, Colorado, 1993.
26.
DocktermanD. A., Teaching in the One Computer Classroom, Tom Snyder Productions, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989.
27.
GeisertP. G. and FutrellM. K., Teachers, Computers, and Curriculum: Microcomputers in the Classroom (2nd Edition), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1995.
28.
SteubingS.WolfshorndlA.CoursineauL. K., and DiPetrillosS. E., Technology—Rich Learning Environments in Elementary and Secondary School: An Interactive Study of Physical Settings and Educational Change, Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino, California, 1992.
29.
MilheimW. D., Interactivity and Computer-Based Instruction, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24: 3, pp. 225–233, 1995–1996.
30.
VockellE. L., The Computer and Academic Learning Time, The Clearing House, 61: 2, pp. 72–75, October 1987.
31.
BrooksJ. G. and BrooksM. G., In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, 1993.
