Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Political interference with federal agency science threatens our health, safety, and environment. The Environmental Protection Agency's recent air pollution rules on fine particulate matter (PM) are particularly egregious assaults on public health and the integrity of science in federal policy making. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has been actively monitoring and documenting cases of such interference and mobilizing scientists and citizens alike to push for reforms. Information on the PM case, and many others, are available on the UCS website (http://www.ucsusa.org).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Laden

. Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality: Extended Follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities Study, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 173, pp. 667–672, 2006.

NIEHS press release, Accessed 10/23/2006 at http://www.niehs.nih.gov/oc/news/particle.htm.

Wilson

, “EPA Panel Advises Agency Chief to Think Again.” Los Angeles Times. February 4, 2006.

“Time to Speak Up for Clean Air,”

Editorial, Philadelphia Inquirer, March 8, 2006.

Nesmith

, “EPA Advisors Unhappy over Air Particulates Decision.” Cox News Service. January 14, 2006.

CASAC comments on the NAAQS proposal, accessed 10/23/2006 at http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/casac_initial_comments_epa_naaqs_proc_rev_2006_final_ltr.pdf.

Evidence of Political Interference / EPA Air Pollution Decision Threatens Public Health: Science Disregarded,Misrepresented on Particulate Matter Standard

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References