Establishing the causal link between disease and working conditions is no easy task. In Québec, an original collaborative project combining epidemiology, community organization, and medical care has evolved over the years in order to promote the recognition of work-related diseases, particularly among non-unionized workers. This article will describe this innovative project as well as its achievements, strengths, and weaknesses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LevensteinC.TuminaroD. J., The Political Economy of Occupational Disease, in Work, Health and the Environment. Old Problems, New Solutions, LevensteinC.WoodingJ. (eds.), The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 3–18, 1997.
2.
FlibotteL.LafranceR., Réflexions sur l'Histoire et les Fondements du Régime d'Indemnisation des Victimes d'Accidents et de Maladies du Travail [Thoughts on the History and the Structure of the Compensation Regime for Work-Related Accidents and Diseases], 17 pp., 1998.
3.
HerbertR., The Union Health Center: A Working Model of Clinical Care Linked to Preventive Occupational Health Services, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31, pp. 263–273, 1997.
4.
LaxM., The Occupational Health Clinical Center in New York State: Achievements, Prospects and Constraints, in Work, Health and the Environment. Old Problems, New Solutions, LevensteinC.WoodingJ. (eds.), The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 363–386, 1997.
5.
DillardP., Community Occupational Health Clinics in the Free Market, in Work, Health and the Environment. Old Problems, New Solutions, LevensteinC.WoodingJ. (eds.), The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 387–404, 1997.
6.
Assemblée des Travailleurs et Travailleuses Accidenté-e-s du Québec, Le Processus d‘Évaluation Médicale Dans les Cadre de la Loi sur les Accidents du Travail et des Maladies Professionelles [Assembly of Injured Workers of Québec, The Medical Evaluation Process According to the Law on Work-Related Accidents and Diseases], 1995.
7.
CanadaProulx Hershey, Appeals Commission Concerning Professional Lesions (CALP), 19 pp., July 10, 1997, or Poitras and Agromex, CALP, 18 pp., 1997.
8.
SilversteinB. A.FineL. J.ArmstrongT. J., Occupational Factors and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 11, pp. 343–358, 1987.
9.
BernardB. P. (ed.), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chapter 5a, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, 1997.
10.
DembeA., The Social History of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Second International Scientific Conference on Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, pp. 1–5, 1995.
11.
MaloJ.-L., Compensation for Occupational Asthma in Québec, Chest, 98:5, pp. 236s–239s, 1990.
12.
WagnerG. R.WegmanD. H., Occupational Asthma: Prevention by Definition, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 33, pp. 427–429, 1998.
13.
ACCP Consensus Statement; Moira Chan-Yeung (chair), Assessment of Asthma in the Workplace, Chest, 108, pp. 1084–1117, 1995.
14.
Gilberrt and Clinique Véterinaire de Jonquière, CALP, 17 pp., 1991; or Roy-Chidiac and Commission Scolaire des Draveurs, CALP, 31 pp., 1994.
15.
LippelK., Preventive Reassignment of Pregnant or Breast-Feeding Workers: The Québec Model, New Solutions, 8:2, pp. 267–280, 1998.
16.
Lithonia Lighting Canada and Carranza and C.S.S.T.; CALP, 49 pp., 1997.
17.
HerbertR.JanewayK.SchechterC., Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Workers' Compensation among an Occupational Clinic Population in New York State, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 35, pp. 335–342, 1999.
18.
ArmstrongT. J., A Conceptual Model for Work-Related Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 19, pp. 73–84, 1993.
