This article addresses one specific method of authentic assessment, portfolio assessment, by applying this method in two case studies assessing learning of instructional technology. Suggestions for practitioners who wish to use this method are provided at the conclusion of the article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MessickS., The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments, Educational Researcher, 23:2, pp. 13–23, 1994.
2.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Assessment Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Reston, Virginia, 1993.
3.
HansenJ., Evaluation “My Portfolio Shows Who I Am,”The Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 14:1, pp. 5–9, 1991.
4.
MeyerC. A., What's the Difference between Authentic and Performance Assessment?Educational Leadership, 48:8, pp. 39–40, 1992.
5.
WigginsG., Terms of Assessment, Electronic Learning, 12:4, p. 23, 1993.
6.
RyanJ. M.MiyasakaJ. R., Current Practices in Testing and Assessment: What is Driving the Changes?Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 79:573, pp. 1–10, 1995.
7.
McTigheJ. J.FerraraS., A Process for Planning More Thoughtful Classroom Assessment, in If Minds Matter, A Foreward to the Future, CostaA.BellancaJ.FogartyR. (eds.), Skylight Publishers, Palatine, Illinois, 1992.
8.
VavrusL., Putting Portfolios to the Test, Instructor, 100:1, pp. 48–63, 1990.
9.
LescherN. L., Portfolios: Assessing Learning in the Primary Grades, NEA Professional Library, Washington, DC, 1995.
10.
ColeD. J.RyanC. W.KickF., Portfolios Across the Curriculum and Beyond, Corwin Press, Inc.Thousand Oaks, California, 1995.
