Abstract
Medieval historians evaluated the deaths of individuals in moral terms and often interpreted them as divine intervention. They discerned two types of death: a good, even beautiful death in terms of the “Art of Dying,” and a bad, shameful death, particularly when inflicted in a public execution. However, the indignity of a public death could lead to greater admiration for and a positive judgment about the executed because of the way in which he met his end. While such a “legal death” contained obvious elements of retribution, deterrence, and atonement in a sacral sense, the spectacle of a public execution could provide a very subtle interplay of learning and teaching how to die on the part of the executed and the spectators alike.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
