The article comments on the two early stages linking categorization to aesthetics, and introduces a third and unpublished stage. It expands upon a previous attempt (Whitfield, 1983) to reconcile the opposing positions occupied by the categorical and Collative-Motivational models. It does so by recourse to Tversky's (1977) distinction between two forms of feature salience—intensive and diagnostic. Features of high intensive salience should possess high arousal potential, while features of high diagnostic salience should be most prototypic. It postulates that intensive and diagnostic salience will be major determinants of aesthetic preference, and that the contribution of each will be a function of the categorical status—or meaningfulness—of the stimuli. This theoretical reconciliation could be termed a Categorical-Motivation model. Finally, attention is given to fundamental and unresolved problems that have undermined theory construction in the field of experimental aesthetics. These concern the nature of both the stimuli and the response measures typically employed. Questions of ecological validity are raised and the possible reinterpretation of results involving meaningless stimuli.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimR. (1954). Art and visual perception.Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Beebe-CenterJ. G. (1965). The psychology of pleasantness and unpleasantness.New York: Russell and Russell.
3.
BerlyneD. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.
4.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5.
BerlyneD. E. (1975). Dimensions of perceptions of exotic and pre-Renaissance paintings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 151–172.
6.
BoselieF. (1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65–73.
7.
BoselieF. (1996). Prototypicality revisited: A rejoinder to Hekkert and Snelders. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 99–104.
8.
BoyntonR. M., & OlsonC. X. (1987). Locating basic colours in the OSA space. Colour Research and Application, 12, 94–105.
9.
BoyntonR. M., & OlsonC. X. (1990). Salience of chromatic basic colour terms confirmed by three measures. Vision Research, 30, 1311–1317.
10.
CantorG. N. (1968). Children's ‘like-dislike’ ratings of familiarised and unfamiliarised visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 651–657.
11.
CrozierW. R., & ChapmanA. (1981). Aesthetic preferences: Prestige and social class. In O'HareD. P. A. (Ed.), Psychology and the arts.New Jersey: Humanities Press.
12.
EysenckH. J. (1941). A critical and experimental study of colour preference. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 385–394.
13.
GaltonF. (1907). Inquiries into human faculty and its development.London: Dent.
14.
GärlingT. (1976). The structural analysis of environmental perception and cognition: A multidimensional scaling approach. Environment and Behaviour, 8, 385–415.
15.
GarnerW. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure.New York: Halsted.
16.
GrangerG. W. (1979). Psychology of art. In ConnollyK. (Ed.), Psychology surveys (No. 2). London: Allen and Unwin.
17.
GuggenheimJ., & WhitfieldT. W. A. (1991). Designer integration in CIM: A motivational approach. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 455–466.
18.
GuilfordJ. P., & SmithP. C. (1959). A system of colour-preference. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 487–502.
19.
HekkertP., & SneldersH. M. J. J. (1995). Prototypicality as an explanatory concept in aesthetics: A reply to Boselie (1991). Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 149–160.
20.
HekkertP., & SneldersH. M. J. J. (1996). Comment on prototypicality revisited. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 105–107.
21.
HekkertP., & van WieringenP. C. (1991). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483–495.
22.
HerzogT. R.KaplanS., & KaplanR. (1976). The prediction of preference for familiar urban places. Environment and Behaviour, 8, 595–609.
23.
HochbergJ. (1978). Art and perception. In CarteretteE. C. & FriedmanM. P., (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.
24.
InuiM. (1966). Practical analysis of interior colour environment. Building Research Institute, Japan: Occasional Report No. 27. Tokyo: The Institute.
25.
IrwinF. W. (1958). An analysis of the concepts of discrimination and preference. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 152–163.
26.
KonecniV. J. (1982). Social interaction and musical preference. In DeutschD. (Ed.). The psychology of music.New York: Academic Press.
27.
KreitlerH., & KreitlerS. (1972). Psychology of the arts.Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
28.
LindauerM. S. (1973). Towards a liberalization of experimental aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31, 459–465.
29.
LokenB., & WardJ. C. (1990). Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 111–126.
30.
MainwaringJ. (1941). An examination of the value of the empirical approach to aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 32, 114–130.
31.
MartindaleC. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 5, 49–80.
32.
MartindaleC., & MooreK. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661–670.
33.
MorrisC. (1956). Varieties of human value.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O'HareD. P. A. (1976). Individual differences in perceived similarity and preference for visual art: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 445–452.
36.
O'HareD. P. A., & GordonI. E. (1977). Dimensions of the perception of art: Verbal scales and similarity judgements. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 66–70.
RoschE. (1978). Principles of categorisation. In RoschE. & LloydB. B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorisation.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
RoschE., & MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
40.
RussellP. A. (1997). Musical tastes and society. In HargreavesD. J. & NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
SimonW. E. (1971). Number and colour response of some college students: Preliminary evidence for a blue-seven phenomenon. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 373–374.
42.
SivikL. (1974a). Colour meaning and perceptual colour dimensions: A study of colour samples. Göteborg Psychological Reports, 4, No. 1.
43.
SivikL. (1974b). Colour meaning and perceptual colour dimensions: a study of exterior colours. Göteborg Psychological Reports, 4, No. 11.
44.
SparshottF. E. (1963). The structure of aesthetics.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
45.
SturgesJ., & WhitfieldT. W. A. (1995). Locating basic colours in the Munsell space. Colour Research and Application, 20, 364–376.
46.
SturgesJ., & WhitfieldT. W. A. (1997). Salient features of Munsell colour space as a function of monolexemic naming and response latencies. Vision Research, 37, 307–313.
47.
TverskyA. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–350.
48.
WardJ. C.BitnerM. J., & BarnesJ. (1992). Measuring the prototypicality and meaning of retail environments. Journal of Retailing, 68, 194–220.
49.
WhitfieldT. W. A. (1981). Salient features of colour space. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 87–90.
50.
WhitfieldT. W. A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 221–237.
51.
WhitfieldT. W. A. (1984). Individual differences in the evaluation of architectural colour: Categorisation effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 183–186.
52.
WhitfieldT. W. A., & SlatterP. E. (1978). The evaluation of architectural interior colour as a function of style of furnishings: Categorisation effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19, 251–255.
53.
WhitfieldT. W. A., & SlatterP. E. (1979). The effects of categorisation and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 65–75.
54.
WhitfieldT. W. A., & WiltshireT. J. (1990). Colour psychology: A critical review. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 385–411.
55.
WohlwillJ. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics: The environment as a source of affect. In AltmanI. & WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Human behaviour and environment (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.
56.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.
