Interest in the spirit world has blossomed since the 1990s. Four in 10 Americans claim to have been in touch with the dead. Mainstream movies featuring ghosts have made millions, television shows featuring mediums are broadcast throughout the country, books concerning the spirit world have made the New York Times bestsellers list, and the deceased have been increasingly put to work by Madison Avenue. Developed here is a theory of the relations between historical cycles of spiritualism, women's interest in that movement, and how that is related to women's visibility and power within society. It is argued that women have historically had a fairly constant interest in the spirit world. Spiritualism's current popularity is a result of women having more power and visibility, giving the spirit world a prominence in society that it previous only had during spiritualism “boom” periods when men became interested.
BergerG. (1944, September 10). The ouija comes back. New York Times, p. SM46.
3.
BrandonR. (1983). The spiritualists: The passion for the occult in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
4.
BraudeA. (2001). Radical spirits: Spiritualism and women's rights in nineteenth-century America. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
5.
BraudeS. (2003). Immortal remains: The evidence for life after death. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
BrodyL. (2001). Gender, emotion, and the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
CarrollB. (1997). Spiritualism in antebellum America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
CarrollB. (2000). A higher power to feel: Spiritualism, grief, and Victorian manhood. Men and Masculinities, 3(1), 3–29.
9.
ClineS. (1997). Lifting the taboo: Women, death and dying. New York: New York University Press.
10.
CoxR. (2003). Body and soul: A sympathetic history of American spiritualism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
11.
Cox-ChapmanM. (1995). The case for heaven: Near-death experiences as evidence of the afterlife. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
12.
DavisJ. A., & SmithT. W. (1989). General Social Survey. (Machine-readable data file). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer.
13.
de VriesB. (2001, Summer). Grief: Intimacy's reflection. Generations, 75–80.
14.
EasleaB. (1986). The masculine image of science with special reference to physics: How much does gender really matter? In HardingJ. (Ed.), Perspectives on gender and science. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
FischerA., & MansteadA. (2000). The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures. In FischerA. (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FiskeE. (1969, December 25). Religion in the age of aquarius. New York Times, p. 41.
19.
GarsideR., & Klimes-DouganB. (2002). Socialization of discrete negative emotions: Gender differences and links with psychological distress. Sex Roles, 47(3/4), 115–128.
20.
GoldsmithB. (1998). Other powers: The age of suffrage, spiritualism, and the scandalous Victoria Woodhull. New York: Random House.
21.
HeinenT. (2002, September 28). More taking interest in spiritualism. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, p. 01B.
22.
Hints of séances at White House. (1926, May 19). New York Times, p. 26.
23.
Ingersoll-DaytonB.StarrelsM., & DowlerD. (1996). Caregiving for parents and parents-in-law: Is gender important?The Gerontologist, 36, 483–491.
24.
KaminerW. (1996, June 26). The ghost and Mrs. Clinton. New York Times, p. A19.
25.
KlinghofferD. (1998, April 6). Ghost story. National Review, 50(6), 32–33.
26.
LangtonJ. (1976, April 18). Free woman. New York Times, p. 7.
27.
LescarbouraA. C. (1920). Edison's views on life and death. Scientific American, 123, 446.
28.
LevyR.MageoJ. M., & HowardA. (1996). Gods, spirits, and history: A theoretical perspective. In MageoJ. M. & HowardA. (Eds.), Spirits in culture, history, and mind. New York: Routledge.
29.
MacDonaldW. L. (1992). Idionecrophanies: The social construction of perceived contact with the dead. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(2), 215–223.
30.
MattinglyM., & BianchiS. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81(3), 999–1030.
31.
McGarryM. (2000). Spectral sexualities: Nineteenth-century spiritualism, moral panics, and the making of U.S. obscenity law. Journal of Women's History, 12(2), 8–29.
32.
MorseM. (1995). Women changing science: Voices from a field in transition. New York: Insight Books.
NealM.Ingersoll-DaytonB., & StarrelsM. (1997). Gender and relationship differences in caregiving patterns and consequences among employed caregivers. The Gerontologist, 37, 804–816.
35.
NelsonG. (1969). Spiritualism and society. New York: Schocken Books.
36.
Nielsen Station Index. (2002). July ratings period.
37.
NSAC. National Spiritualist Association of Churches. Web site: http://www.nsac.org/.
OwenA. (1990). The darkened room: Women, power and spiritualism in late Victorian England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
40.
PaceE. (1974, July 21). Magic casting a spell around much of U.S., spurring trick sales. New York Times, p. 41.
41.
PileggiN. (1970). The age of occult. McCalls, pp. 61–65.
42.
SchwabR. (1996). Gender differences in parental grief. Death Studies, 20, 103–113.
43.
SchwartzG. (2002). The afterlife experiments: Breakthrough scientific evidence of life after death. New York: Pocket Books.
44.
SidmoreK. (1999). Parental bereavement: Levels of grief as affected by gender issues. Omega, 40(2), 351–374.
45.
SkultansV. (1983). Mediums, controls and eminent men. In HoldenP. (Ed.), Women's religious experience (pp. 15–26). Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.
46.
SorokinP. (1942). Man and society in calamity: The effects of war, revolution, famine, pestilence upon human mind, behavior, social organization and cultural life. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company.
47.
SpencerW. (2001). To absent friends: Classical spiritualist mediumship and new age channeling compared and contrasted. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 16(3), 343–360.
48.
Spiritualism. (2002). In Religions of the world: A comprehensive encyclopedia of beliefs and practices (Vol. 4; pp. 1213–1215). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
49.
SteinC.WemmerusV.WardM.GainesM.FreeberyA., & JewellT. (1998). “Because they're my parents”: An intergenerational study of felt obligation and parental caregiving. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(3), 611–622.
50.
StinsonK.LaskerJ.LohmannJ., & ToedterL. (1992). Parents' grief following pregnancy loss: A comparison of mothers and fathers. Family Relations, 41, 218–223.
51.
StraussW., & HoweN. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584–2069. New York: Morrow.
52.
TruzziM. (1972). The occult revival as popular culture: Some random observations on the old and nouveau witch. The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 16–36.
53.
WallissJ. (2001). Continuing bonds: Relationships between the living and the dead within contemporary Spiritualism. Mortality, 6(2), 127–145.
54.
WashingtonP. (1995). Madame Blavatsky's baboon: A history of mystics, mediums, and misfits who brought Spiritualism to America. New York: Schocken Books.
55.
WattL. (2001, January 7). Contacting spirits right up there: Communication with “other side” gains followers. The Denver Post, p. F01.
56.
WrobelA. (1987). Pseudo-science and society in nineteenth century America. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
