The basket collecting activities of dealers and amateurs between the 1860's and the 1920's in California is described. Four phases are defined: initial purchase by dealers of old traditional baskets; production of baskets in the form of white containers by Indians; height of basket buying “craze”; Indian response to expanded market with new copies of old baskets. Interviews with weavers, comments of collectors, and practices of dealers all indicate that baskets made for sale have different design compositions than those made for Indian use. Definition of these non-Indian factors for design change will assist in appropriate use of museum specimens collected during this same period for a subsequent study of the changes in design structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CantwellA. E.GriffinJ. B., and RothschildN. A., (eds.), The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collections, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, New York, 376, 1981.
2.
WashburnD. K., A Symmetry Analysis of Upper Gila Area Ceramic Design, Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 68, 1977.
3.
NordhoffC., California: for Health, Pleasure, and Residence: A Book for Travellers and Settlers, Harper and Bros., New York, 1873.
4.
BatesC., The California Collection of I. G. Voznesenski, American Indian Art, 8, pp. 36–41, 79, 1983.
5.
CarrJ. C., Among the Basket Makers, The California Illustrated Magazine, 2, pp. 597–610, 1892.
6.
TheodoratusD. J., Cultural and Social Change among the Coast Central Pomo, The Journal of California Anthropology, 1, pp. 206–219, 1974.
7.
HeizerR. F. and MillsJ. E. (compilers and eds.), The Four Ages of Tsurai, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1952.
8.
KojeanP. M., Woven Vessels of the California Indians, in Culture and Life of the Natives of America, XXIV, Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography, Academy of Sciences, USSR, N. N. Miklooho-Maklai Institute of Ethnography, Leningrad, 1967, reprinted in Mapom Papers, 4, Miwok Archaeological Preserve of Marin, 1979.
9.
CookS. F., The American Invasion, 1848–1870, Ibero-Americana, 23, pp. 1–115, 1943.
10.
PowersS., The Northern California Indians, Overland Monthly, 8, pp. 530–539, 1872.
11.
ScidmoreE. R., Indian Baskets, Harper's Bazaar, 27, pp. 704–706, 1894.
12.
HudsonJ. W., Pomo Basket Makers, Overland Monthly, Ser. 2, 21, pp. 561–578, 1893.
13.
McLendonS., Preparing Museum Collections for Use as Primary Data in Ethnographic Research, in The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collections, pp. 201–227, 1981.
14.
JamesG. W., Indian Basketry, Henry Malkan, New York, 1901.
15.
MerriamC. H., Papers, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
16.
BaileyR. C., Collector's Choice, The McLeod Basket Collection, 13th Annual Publication of the Kern County Historical Society, Bakersfield, 1951.
17.
Illustrated History of Indian Baskets and Plates made by California Indians and many other tribes, Souvenir brochure from the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, San Francisco, 1915.
18.
AndersonA. W., The Last Industry of a Passing Race, Harper's Bazaar, 32, p. 965, 1899.
19.
FryW. S., Humboldt Indians, Out West, 21, pp. 503–515, 1904.
20.
FosterG. M., A Summary of Yuki Culture, Anthropological Records, University of California, Berkeley, 5, pp. 155–244, 1944.
21.
LummisC. F., The Campbell Collection of Baskets, The Land of Sunshine, 2, p. 85, 1895.
22.
ConnerJ. T., Confessions of a Basket Collector, The Land of Sunshine, 5, pp. 3–10, 1896.
23.
JamesG. W. (ed.), The Basket, The Journal of the Basket Fraternity of Lovers of Indian Baskets and Other Good Things, Pasadena, 1–2, 1903–1904.
24.
JamesG. W., The Lake of the Sky, L. C. Page & Co., Boston, 1915.
25.
‘Traveller,’ “Studio-Talk,”The International Studio, 20, pp. 144–146, 1903.
26.
KroeberA. L., Basket Designs of the Indians of Northwestern California, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Berkeley, 2, pp. 105–164, 1905.
27.
MasonO. T., Aboriginal American Basketry, Annual Report for 1902, Smithsonian Institution, Part 2, 1904.
28.
WatkinsF. E., The Homer E. Sargent Collection, The Masterkey, 11, pp. 174–176, 1937.
29.
WatkinsF. E., The Caroline-Boeing Poole Collection of American Indian Baskets, The Masterkey, 13, pp. 92–95, 1939.
30.
MerriamC. H., The Indian Population of California, American Anthropologist, 7, pp. 594–606, 1905.
31.
CookS. F., The Physical and Demographic Reaction of the Non-Mission Indians in Colonial and Provincial California, Ibero-Americana, 22, pp. 1–55, 1943.
32.
PowersS.YoucutsThe, Overland Monthly, 11, p. 105–116, 1873 in The Northern California Indians, HeizerR. (ed.), Archaeological Research Facility, University of California, Berkeley, Contribution No. 25, 1975.
33.
VoegelinE.W., Tubatulabal Ethnography, Anthropological Records, University of California, Berkeley, 2, pp. 1–123, 1938.
34.
MerwinB. W., The Patty Stuart Jewett Collection, The Museum Journal, 9, pp. 225–243, 1918.
35.
WashburnD. K., Analysis of the Structure of California Indian Basket Design, ms. in preparation.
36.
DixonR. B., Basketry Designs of the Maidu Indians, American Anthropologist, 2, pp. 266–276, 1900.
37.
O'NealeL. M., Fieldnotes on the Basketry of Northwestern California: 11 notebooks, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1930.
38.
DixonR. B., The Shasta, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 17, pp. 381–498, 1907.
39.
GarthT. R., Atsugewi Ethnography, Anthropological Records, University of California, Berkeley, 14, pp. 129–212, 1953.
40.
MerriamC. H., Studies of California Indians, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1955.
41.
O'NealeL. M., Yurok-Karok Basket Weavers, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Berkeley, 32, pp. 1–184, 1932.
