Collative Variables versus Prototypicality

Abstract

Recent research on experimental aesthetics has been dominated by debate on the relative importance of two theories concerning arousal-mediating and cognitive variables respectively. The present article discusses two arguments which suggest that this debate may be potentially spurious and unnecessary. First, the apparent importance of either theory may be partly dependent on the stimuli employed. Second, it is impossible to distinguish between the two classes of variables, such that variations in arousal-mediating factors also reflect variations in cognitive factors. A discussion of the implications of these arguments suggests that it is possible to reconcile the two approaches, such that both can make a useful contribution to the understanding of aesthetic processes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne

D. E.

(1971). Aesthetics ind psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Boselie

(1991). Against prototypicality as a central concept in aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 65–73.

Hekkert

, & Snelders

H. M. J. J.

(1995). Prototypicality as an explanatory concept in aesthetics: A reply to Boselie. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 149–160.

Hekkert

, & van Wieringen

P. C. W.

(1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483–495.

Konecni

V. J.

(1996). Daniel E. Berlyne (1924-1976): Two decades later. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 129–142.

Martindale

, & Moore

(1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661–670.

Martindale

, & Moore

(1989). Relationship of musical preference to collative, ecological, and psychophysical variables. Music Perception, 6, 431–455.

Martindale

Moore

, & Borkum

(1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53–80.

Martindale

Moore

, & West

(1988). Relationship of preference judgements to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 79–96.

10.

Moore

, & Martindale

(1983). Preference for shapes varying, in color, color typicality, size, and complexity. Paper presented at the International Conference on Psychology and the Arts, Cardiff.

11.

North

A. C.

, & Hargreaves

D. J.

(1995). Subjective complexity, familiarity, and liking for popular music. Psychomusicology, 14, 77–93.

12.

Whitfield

T. W. A.

(1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects. An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 221–237.

13.

Whitfield

T. W. A.

, & Slatter

P. E.

(1979). The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 65–75.