Script theory has been used to understand shared social norms for behavior in specific situations [1], and more broadly, to analyze individual life patterns by looking at highly personalized life scripts [2]. This article applies a methodology derived from script theory in an attempt to better understand life choices of women. Individual women's perceptions of daily life scripts for a successful woman lawyer, a secretary, and a full time homemaker are used as data for predicting these women's own career aspirations. Predicted relationships were strongest for the lawyer scenario data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonR. P., Psychological Status of the Script Concept, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 715–729, 1981.
2.
SteinerC. M., Scripts People Live: Transactional Analysis of Life Scripts, Grove Press, New York, 1974.
3.
United States Government, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment and Earnings, January 1979 and September 1979.
4.
EcclesJ. S. and HoffmanL. W., Socialization and the Maintenance of a Sex Segregated Labor Market, in Research in Child Development and Social Policy, Vol. 1, StevensonH. W. and SiegelA. E. (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984.
5.
FitzgeraldL. F. and CritesJ. O., Toward a Career Psychology of Women: What Do We Know? What Do We Need to Know?, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, pp. 44–62, 1980.
6.
BarnettR. C. and BaruchG. K., The Competent Woman, Irvington Publishers, New York, 1978.
7.
GreenglassE. R. and DevinsR., Factors Related to Marriage and Career Plans in Unmarried Women, Sex Roles, 8, pp. 57–71, 1982.
8.
KaufmanD. R. and RichardsonB. L., Achievement and Women: Challenging the Assumptions, The Free Press, New York, 1982.
9.
UngerR. K., Female and Male: Psychological Perspectives, Harper and Row, New York, 1979.
10.
KomarovskyM., Female Freshmen View their Future: Career Salience and Its Correlates, Sex Roles, 8, pp. 299–314, 1982.
11.
ParsonsJ. E.FriezeI. H., and RubleD. N., Intrapsychic Factors Influencing Career Aspirations in College Women, Sex Roles, 4, pp. 337–347, 1978.
12.
GinzbergE.GinsburgS. W.AxelradS., and HermaJ. L., Occupational Choice: An Approach to a General Theory, Columbia University Press, New York, 1951.
13.
FalkW. W. and CosbyA. G., Women's Marital-Familial Status and Work Histories: Some Conceptual Considerations, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, pp. 126–140, 1978.
14.
TouchtonJ. G. and MagoonT. M., Occupational Daydreams as Predictors of Vocational Plans of College Women, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, pp. 156–166, 1977.
15.
SteinerC., Games Alcoholics Play: An Analysis of Life Scripts, Grove Press, New York, 1971.
16.
CarlsonR., Studies in Script Theory: I. Adult Analogs of A Childhood Nuclear Scene, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, pp. 501–510, 1981.
17.
TomkinsS. S., Script Theory: Differential Magnification of Affects, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 26, HoweH. E.Jr. and DienstbierR. A. (eds.), 1978.
18.
MarkusH. and NuriusP., Possible Selves, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Indiana, 1982.
19.
BowerG. H.BlackJ. B., and TurnerT. J., Scripts in Memory for Text, Cognitive Psychology, 11, pp. 177–220, 1979.
20.
GoffmanE., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday, New York, 1959.
21.
ShankR. C. and AbelsonR. P., Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1977.
22.
AshmoreR. D. and DelBocaF. K., Sex Stereotypes and Implicit Personality Theory: Toward a Cognitive-Social Psychological Conceptualization, Sex Roles, 5, pp. 219–248, 1979.
23.
NiedenthalP. M.CantorN., and KihlstromJ. F., Prototype Matching: A Strategy for Social Decision Making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp. 575–584, 1985.
24.
AngristS. S. and AlmquistE. M., Careers and Contingencies, Dunellen, New York, 1975.
25.
MarkusH.CraneM.BernsteinS., and SiladiM., Self-Schemas and Gender, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp. 38–50, 1982.
26.
HustonA. C., Sex Typing and Socialization, invited address for the American Psychological Association Annual Meetings, Washington, D.C., 1982.
27.
ElderG. H.Jr. and MacInnisD. J., Achievement Imagery in Women's Lives from Adolescence to Adulthood, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp. 394–404, 1983.
28.
AndersonC. A., Imagination and Expectation: The Effect of Imagining Behavioral Scripts on Personal Intentions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp. 293–305, 1983.
29.
GoldthorpeJ. H. and HopeK., The Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale, Oxford University Press, London, 1974.
30.
ReissA. J., Occupation and Social Status, The Free Press, New York, 1961.
31.
LottB. E., Who Wants the Children? Some Relationships among Attitudes toward Children, Parents, and the Liberation of Women, American Psychologist, 28, pp. 573–582, 1973.
32.
TverskyA., Features of Similarity, Psychological Review, 84, pp. 327–352, 1977.
33.
CantorN.MischelW., and SchwartzJ. C., A Prototype Analysis of Psychological Situations, Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp. 45–77, 1982.
34.
AbelsonR. P.KinderD. R.PetersM. D., and FiskeS. T., Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp. 619–630, 1982.
