This article concerns the effects of learner control in computer-assisted instruction (CAI). After reviewing previous reviews of research on the topic, twenty-four studies of learner control were subjected to meta-analysis. The results of both the review and meta-analysis are equivocal. Several reviews indicate that learner control works less well with younger, less able students. Other reviews indicate that, given optimal conditions, learner control can work with any students. The meta-analysis, however, yielded an average effect size that was small and negative suggesting that the average student would be slightly better off without it. Although learner control has theoretical appeal, its effects on learning seem neither powerful nor consistent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SteinbergE., Cognition and Learner Control: A Literature Review, 1977–1988, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16:4, pp. 117–121, 1989.
2.
KinzieM., Learner Control, Continuing Motivation and Achievement, paper presented at annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, 1988.
3.
SnowR., Aptitude, Learner Control and Adaptive Instruction, Educational Psychologist, 15, pp. 151–158, 1980.
4.
NewmanS., Student vs. Instructor Design of Study Method, Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, pp. 328–333, 1957.
5.
MagerR., On the Sequencing of Instructional Content, Psychological Reports, 9, pp. 405–413, 1961.
6.
MagerR., Learner-Controlled Instruction 1958–1964, Programmed Instruction4:2, pp. 1–10, 1964.
FryJ., Interactive Relationship between Inquisitiveness and Student Control of Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 68:5, pp. 459–465, 1972.
9.
RossS., Uses and Effects of Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Computer-Based Instruction, ERIC 323 945, also in Educational Technology Research and Development, 37:4, 1990.
10.
RossS.MorrisonG., In Search of a Happy Medium in Instructional Technology Research: Issues Concerning External Validity, Media Replications, and Learner Control, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 37:1, pp. 19–33, 1989.
11.
TennysonR.TothenW., Management of Computer-Based Instruction: Design from an Adaptive Control Strategy, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 5, pp. 63–71, 1979.
12.
BundersonC., TICCIT Courseware Development Report, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1976.
13.
LaheyG.CrawfordA.HurlockR., Use of Interactive General-Purpose Computer Terminals to Simulate Training Equipment Operation, NPRDC, Report TR 76-19, San Diego, 1977.
14.
McCannR., Learning Strategies and Computer-Based Instruction, Computers and Education, 5, pp. 133–140, 1981.
15.
CampbellV., Self-Direction and Programmed Instruction for Five Different Types of Learning Objectives, Psychology in the Schools, 1, pp. 348–359, 1964.
16.
CarrierC., Do Learners Make Good Instructional Choices?Instructional Innovator, 29, pp. 15–17, 1984.
17.
ReevesT., Pseudoscience in CBI: The Case of Learner Control Research, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, pp. 39–46, 1993.
18.
GoforthD., Learner Control = Decision Making + Information: A Model and A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11:1, pp. 1–26, 1994.
19.
LipseyM.WilsonD., The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational and Behavioral Treatments: Confirmation from Meta-Analysis, American Psychologist, 146, pp. 1181–1209, 1993.
20.
HannafinM., Guidelines for Using Locus of Instructional Control in Design of Computer-Assisted Instruction, Journal of Instructional Development, 7:3, pp. 6–10, 1984.
21.
Higginbotham-WheatN., Learner Control: When Does it Work? ERIC 323 930, 1990.
22.
FriendC.ColeC., Learner Control in Computer Based Instruction: A Current Literature Review, Educational Technology, 1990.
23.
SteinbergE., Review of Student Control in Computer-Based Instruction, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, pp. 84–90, 1977.
24.
MilheimW.AzbellJ., How Past Research on Learner Control Can Aid in the Design of Interactive Video Materials, ERIC Document 295 652, 1988.
25.
RossS.MorrisonG., In Search of a Happy Medium in Instructional Technology Research: Issues Concerning External Validity, Media Replications, and Learner Control, Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 37:1, pp. 19–33, 1989.
26.
SteinbergE., Review of Student Control in Computer-Based Instruction, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, pp. 84–90, 1977.
27.
KinzieM.SullivanH., Continuing Motivation, Learner Control and CAI, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 37:2, pp. 5–14, 1989.
28.
ButlerD. L.WinneP. H., Feedback and Self-Regulating Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, pp. 245–282, 1995.
29.
SteinbergE., Cognition and Learner Control: A Literature Review, 1977–1988, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16:4, pp. 117–121, 1989.
30.
AllenG. W., Learner Control of Review in Computer Assisted Instruction within Military Training, ERIC 3223 913, 1990.
31.
ArnoneM.GrabowskiB., Effects on Children's Achievement and Curiosity of Variations in Learner Control Over an Interactive Video Lesson, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 40:1, pp. 15–27, 1992.
32.
AuerbachE. J., Effectiveness and Efficiency of Learner Choice of Analogical Context on Learners with High and Low Prior Conceptual Understanding Computer-Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1989.
33.
BillR. L., The Role of Advance Organizer, Learner Control, and Student's Locus of Control on Acquisition of Pharmacokinetics Concepts and Attitudes towards Computer-Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1990.
34.
CarrierC. A.WilliamsM. D., A Test of One Learner Control Strategy with Students of Differing Levels of Task Persistence, American Education Research Journal, 25:2, pp. 285–306, 1988.
35.
CarrierC.DavidsonG.WilliamsM.KalweitC., Instructional Options and Encouragement Effects in a Microcomputer-Delivered Concept Lesson, Journal of Educational Research, 79:4, pp. 222–229, 1986.
36.
ClarkR., Antagonism between Achievement and Enjoyment in ATI Studies, Educational Psychologist, 17:2, pp. 92–101, 1982.
37.
CooroughR. P., The Effects of Program Control, Learner Control and Learner Control with Advisement Lesson Control Strategies on Anxiety and Learning from Computer-Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Florida, 1990.
38.
DashtiF. A., Student VS. Computer Program Control in Learning to Add Decimal Numbers, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1988.
39.
DinkinsP., Development of a Computer Assisted Instruction Courseware Package in Statistics and a Comparative Analysis of Three Management Strategies for this Courseware, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1985.
40.
DuchastelP., Intelligent Computer Assisted Instruction Systems: The Nature of Learner Control, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2:3, 1986.
41.
El-SanhurryN. A. A., Effects of Freedom to Control a Science Learning Sequence of Computer-Based Instruction on Achievement and Attitudes of Junior High School Formal and Nonformal Reasoners (Formal Reasoner), unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1990.
42.
FisherM. D.BlackwellL.GarciaA.GreeneJ., Effects of Student Control and Choice of Engagement in a CAI Arithmetic Task in a Low Income School, Journal of Educational Psychology, 67:6, pp. 776–783, 1975.
43.
GarhartC.HannafinM., The Accuracy of Cognitive Monitoring during Computer Based Instruction, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 133, pp. 83–93, 1986.
44.
GayG., Interaction of Learner Control and Prior Understanding in Computer-Assisted Video Instruction, Journal of Education Psychology, 78:3, pp. 225–227, 1986.
45.
GayG.TrumbullD.SmithJ., Perceptions of Control and Use of Control Options in Computer Assisted Video Instruction, Tech Trends, 1988.
46.
GizaraJ. M., A Comparison of the Effects of the Student Controlled CAI and Computer Controlled CAI in a Remedial Program for Solving Stoichiometry Problems in Chemistry, unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, 1989.
47.
GleasonJ. M., The Effects of Learner Control, Prior Knowledge of Content, and Advisement on Test Scores and the Selection of Gagne's Instructional Events in a Computer Based Mathematic Lesson, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986.
48.
GoetfriedL.HannafinM., The Effect of the Locus of CAI Control Strategies on the Learning of Mathematics Rules, American Educational Research Journal, 22:2, pp. 273–278, 1985.
49.
GrayD. M., The Use and Effects on Performance of Learner Control and Advisement in a Computer Based Educational Statistic Lesson, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 1988.
50.
GrayS., Sequence Control of Menus and CAI: A Follow-Up Study, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15:2, pp. 57–60, 1988.
51.
HansenF. C., An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) for Teaching Statistics to Social Work Students, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 1981.
52.
HansenJ., Effects of Feedback, Learner Control and Cognitive Abilities on State Anxiety and Performance in a Computer-Assisted Instruction Task, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66:2, pp. 247–254, 1974.
53.
HickenS., Learner Control and Incentive in Computer-Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1991.
54.
JohansenK. J., Advisement Information in Rule Learning using Learner Controlled, Computer Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, 1980.
55.
KinzieM.SullivanH.BerdeiR., Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer Assisted Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80:3, pp. 299–303, 1992.
56.
KinzieM., Motivational and Achievement Effects of Learner Control of Computer Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1988.
57.
LaurillardD., Styles of Computer-Based Learning and Training, ERIC 298 947, 1983.
58.
LaurillardD., Interactive Video and Control of Learning, Educational Technology, 1984.
59.
LebrasseurM. A., An Exploratory Use of Interaction Video in Teacher Education, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1987.
60.
LopezC.SullivanH., Locus of Control and the Control of Learning in CAI, ERIC 320 566, 1990.
61.
MagerR.ClarkC., Explorations in Student-Controlled Instruction, Psychological Reports, 13, pp. 71–76, 1963.
62.
MicheliniE. L., Adaptive Computer Assisted Instruction for Rule Acquisition of English Sentence Punctuation Based upon the Right Wrong Pattern of Learner Response, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1988.
63.
MorrisonG.RossS.BaldwinW., Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Learning Elementary School Mathematics, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 40:1, pp. 5–13, 1992.
64.
MullenF. M., The Relationship between Learner Control Field Orientation, and Achievement in Computer Assisted Instruction on Measurement for Industrial Arts Students, unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, 1983.
65.
MullingsG. E., The Effects of Learner/Program Control in Computer Assisted Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 1981.
66.
MurphyM.DavidsonG., Computer-Based Adaptive Instruction: Effects of Learner Control on Concept Learning, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18:2, pp. 51–56, 1991.
67.
PerryR.MagnussonJ.ParsonsonK., Perceived Control in College Classrooms: Limitations in Instructor Expressiveness Due to Noncontingent Feedback and Lecture Content, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78:2, pp. 96–107, 1986.
68.
PetersC. L., The Effects of Advisement, Content Mapping, and Interaction on Learner Control and Achievement in Computer-Based Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1988.
69.
RamnarineS., Content Structure and Management Control Strategies as Instruction, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1981.
70.
RossS.RakowE., Learner Control versus Program Control as Adaptive Strategies for Selection of Instructional Support on Math Rules, Journal of Educational Psychology, 73:5, pp. 745–753, 1981.
71.
SalesG. C., The Effects of Learning Style and Type of Feedback on the Achievement of Pre-Service Teachers in a Computer Based Lesson (Learner, Program, Adaptive Control), unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1985.
72.
SteinbergE.BaskinA.MathewsT., Computer Presented Organizational Memory Aids as Instruction for Solving Pico Fomi Problems, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12:2, pp. 44–49, 1985.
73.
SteinbergE.BaskinA.HoferE., Organizational Memory Tools: A Technique for Improving Problem Solving Skills, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2:2, pp. 169–187, 1986.
74.
TennysonR., Instructional Control Strategies and Content Structure as Design Variables in Concept Acquisition using Computer-Based Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 72:4, pp. 525–532, 1980.
75.
TennysonR., Use of Adaptive Information for Advisement in Learning Concepts and Rules using Computer-Assisted Instruction, American Educational Research Journal, 18:4, pp. 425–438, 1981.
