In taking “existing practice” in the workplace as their standard, technical and professional writing courses risk leaving students with the impression that whatever is done and is rhetorically effective is right. One way of countering the sophistry of this tendency is to raise questions about the ethics of common but suspect rhetorical practices. This article examines the ethics of one such practice: fostering false inference. Out of H. Paul Grice's analysis of how participants in a conversation correctly interpret what is only implied, it evolves a framework for judging the fostering of false inference. The article presents and discusses a hypothetical case in which a firm's proposal seems intended to mislead, while actually stating nothing that is not literally true.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrockmannR. J. and RookF. (eds.), Technical Communication and Ethics, Society for Technical Communication, Washington, D.C., 1989.
2.
GolenS.PowersC., and TitkemeyerM. A.How to Teach Ethics in a Basic Business Communication Class—Committee Report of the 1983 Teaching Methodology and Concepts Committee, Subcommittee 1, The Journal of Business Communication, 22:1, pp. 75–83, Winter 1985.
3.
JohannesenR. L., Ethics in Human Communication, 2nd edition, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois, 1983.
4.
RubensP. M.Reinventing the Wheel?: Ethics for Technical Communicators, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 11:4, pp. 329–339, 1981.
5.
RentzK. C. and DebsM. B.Language and Corporate Values: Teaching Ethics in Business Writing Courses, Journal of Business Communication, 24:3, pp. 37–48, Summer 1987.
6.
HallD. G. and NelsonB. A.Integrating Professional Ethics into the Technical Writing Course, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17:1, pp. 45–61, 1987.
7.
GriffinJ., When Do Rhetorical Choices Become Ethical Choices?, STC Proceedings, Twenty-Seventh International Technical Communication Conference, pp. W77–W82, 1980.
8.
WicclairM. R. and FarkasD. K.Ethical Reasoning in Technical Communication: A Practical Framework, Technical Communication, 31:2, pp. 15–17, 1984.
9.
United States Congress, Joint Hearings Before the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran and Senate Committee on Secret Military Assistance to Iran and the Nicaraguan Opposition: Testimony of Robert C. McFarlane, Gaston J. Sigur, Jr., and Robert W. Owen, 100th Congress, 1st Session, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1987.
10.
IsmondR. L., Insurance Advertising: Ethics and the Law, Roberts Publishing, New York, 1968.
11.
GoldmanA. M., The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics, Rowman and Littlefield, New Jersey, 1980.
12.
RotfeldH. J. and PrestonI. L.The Potential Impact of Research on Advertising Law: The Case of Puffery, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, pp. 9–17, April 1981.
13.
GriceH. P., Logic and Conversation (1967), in The Logic of Grammar, DavidsonD. and HarmanG. (eds.), Dickenson Publishing Co., Encino, pp. 64–75, 1975.
14.
YoosG. E., Rational Appeal and the Ethics of Advocacy, in Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse, ConnorsR. J.EdeL. S., and LundsfordA. (eds.), University of Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale, pp. 82–97, 1984.
15.
Researcher Shows Impact of Implied Deception, Advertising Age, p. 2, April 2, 1973.
16.
PrestonI. L., The Great American Blow-Up: Puffery in Advertising and Selling, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1975.
17.
ShimbergH. L.Ethics and Rhetoric in Technical Writing, Technical Communication, 25:4, pp. 16–18, 1978.
18.
BokS., Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Lives, Vintage Books, New York, 1979.
19.
WalzerA. E., Professional Ethics, Codes of Conduct, and the Society for Technical Communication, in Technical Communication and Ethics, BrockmannR. J. and RookF. (eds.), Society for Technical Communication, Anthology Series, Washington, D.C., 1989.
20.
WalzerA. E.Logic and Rhetoric in Malthus's Essay on the Principal of Population, 1798, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73, pp. 1–17, 1987.
21.
WalzerA. E.Articles from the “California Divorce Project”: A Case Study of the Concept of Audience, CCC, 36, pp. 150–159, 1985.
22.
WalzerA. E.Ethos, Technical Writing, and the Liberal Arts, Technical Writing Teacher, 8, pp. 50–53, 1981.
