The underlying principles of graphic theory have been largely ignored by the technical and scientific communication community. This impatience with theory creates numerous problems for readers of technical information since about 30 percent of such material is graphic in nature. This article offers an overview of the major theoretical schools that have some importance for these fields and discusses their implications for the design and preparation of referential texts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
VonnegutK.Jr., Cat's Cradle, Dell, New York, 1974.
2.
ParksE., View from the Castle, Smithsonian, July, 1982.
3.
MachE., The Analysis of Sensation, Dover, New York, 1959.
4.
SchillingerJ., The Mathematical Basis for the Arts, Philosophical Library, New York, 1949.
5.
RosenfeldA., Picture Languages: Formal Models for Picture Recognition, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
6.
KohlerW., Gestalt Psychology, Liveright, New York, 1929.
7.
KoffkaK., Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 1935.
8.
ZusneL., Visual Perception of Form, Academic Press, New York, 1970.
9.
AttneaveF., Some Informational Aspects of Visual Perception, Psychological Review, 61, pp. 183–193, 1954.
10.
HaberR. N., Information Processing Approaches to Visual Perception, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1969.
11.
BerlyneD. E., Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Hemisphere Publishing, Washington, D.C., 1974.
12.
HochbergJ. E. and McAllisterE., A Quantitative Approach to Figural “Goodness,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, pp. 361–364, 1953.
13.
GreenR. T. and CourtisE. C., Information Theory and Figure Perception: The Metaphor that Failed, Acta Psychologica, 25, pp. 122–136, 1966.
14.
PylshynZ. W., What the Mind's Eye Tells the Mind's Brain, Psychological Bulletin, 80, pp. 1–24, 1973.
15.
KosslynS. M. and PomerantzJ. H., Imagery, Propositions and the Form of Mental Representations, Cognitive Psychology, 9, pp. 52–76, 1977.
16.
FlemingM. L., The Picture on Your Mind, AV Communication Review, 15, pp. 246–256, 1967.
17.
DondisD. A., A Primer of Visual Literacy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1973.
18.
MetallinosN., Perception of the TV Picture: Some Hypotheses to Test the Forces Operating within the Television Screen, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 27: 3, pp. 205–214, 1979.
19.
GriceR. A. and RubensP. M., Placement and Alphanumeric/Iconic Identification of Textual/Illustrative Materials for Technical and Scientific Communication, IEEE Proceedings, 1982.
20.
MarcusA., Typographic Design for Interfaces of Information Systems, Proceedings of Human Factors in Computer Systems Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1982.
21.
NiekampW., An Exploratory Investigation in Factors Affecting Visual Balance, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29: 1, pp. 37–48, 1981.
22.
TinkerM. A., Bases for Effective Reading, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1965.
23.
BurtC., A Psychological Study of Typography, Cambridge University Press, 1959.
24.
SpencerH. L., Typographic Coding in Lists and Bibliographies, Applied Ergonomics, 5: 3, pp. 136–141, 1974.
25.
KlareG. R., The Relationship of Typographic Arrangements to the Learning of Technical Training Material, Journal of Applied Psychology, 41: 1, pp. 41–45, 1957.
26.
FraseL. T. and SchwartzB. J., Typographic Cues that Facllitate Comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 2, pp. 197–206, 1979.
27.
CarverR. P., Effect of “Chunked” Typography on Reading Rate and Comprehension, Journal of Applied Psychology, 54: 3, pp. 288–296, 1970.
28.
FosterJ. and ColesP., An Experimental Study of Typographic Cueing in Printed Texts, Ergonomics, 20: 1, pp. 57–66, 1977.
29.
CharrowV. R. and RedishJ. C., A Study of Standard Headings for Warranties, AIR Document Design Project, Washington, D.C., 1980.
30.
PhilipsR. M., “The Interacting Effects of Letter Style, Letter Stroke-width and Letter Size on the Legibility of Projected High Contrast Lettering,” dissertation, Indiana University, 1976.
31.
CahillM. and CarterR. C., Color Coding Size for Searching Displays of Different Density, Human Factors, 18: 3, pp. 273–280, 1976.
32.
ChristR. E., Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays, Human Factors, 16: 6, pp. 542–570, 1975.
33.
SmithS. L. and ThomasD. W., Color Versus Shape Coding in Information Displays, Journal of Applied Psychology, 48: 3, pp. 137–146, 1964.
34.
TullisT. S., An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays, Human Factors, 23: 5, pp. 541–550, 1981.
35.
FabrizioR., Readability as a Function of the Straightness of Right-Hand Margins, Journal of Typographic Research, 1, pp. 90–95, 1967.
36.
CampbellA. J., Reading Speed and Text Production: A Note on Right Justification Techniques, Ergonomics, 24: 8, pp. 633–640, 1981.
37.
SnyderH. L. and TaylorG. B., The Sensitivity of Response Measures of Alphanumeric Legibility to Variations in Dot Matrix Display Parameters, Human Factors, 21: 4, pp. 457–471, 1979.
38.
ReynoldsL., The Legibility and Readability of View Data Displays, Royal College of Art, London, 1978.
39.
HartleyJ., On the Typing of Tables, Applied Ergonomics, 6, pp. 39–42, 1975.
40.
CohenP. A., A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies on Visual Based Instruction, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981.
41.
MooreN. V. and NawrockiL. H., The Educational Effectiveness of Graphic Displays for Computer Assisted Instruction, U.S. Army Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1978.
42.
DwyerF. M., Exploratory Studies in the Effectiveness of Visual Illustrations, AV Communication Review, 18: 3, pp. 235–248, 1970.
43.
BrookeJ. B. and DuncanK. D., An Experimental Study of Flowcharts as an Aid to Identification of Procedural Faults, Ergonomics, 23, pp. 387–399, 1980.
44.
RichardsC. and JohnsonR., Graphic Codes for Flow Charts, Information Design Journal, 1, pp. 261–270, 1980.
45.
LedgardH. and WhitesideJ. A., The Natural Language of Interactive Systems, Communications of the ACM, 23: 10, pp. 556–563, 1980.
46.
WrightP., Using Tabulated Information, Ergonomics, 11: 4, pp. 331–343, 1968.
47.
WrightP. and FoxK., Explicit and Implicit Tabulation Formats, Ergonomics, 15; 2, pp. 175–187, 1972.
48.
WrightP. and ReidF., Written Information: Some Alternatives to Prose for Expressing the Outcomes of Complex Contingencies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57: 2, pp. 160–166, 1973.
49.
GombrichE. H., Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye, in The Language of Images, MitchellW. J. T. (ed.), University of Chcago Press, Chicago, 1980.
50.
SewellE. H.Jr. and MooreR. L., Cartoon Embellishments in Informative Presentations, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28: 1, pp. 39–46, 1980.
