A 12-week retention program designed to assist at-risk students with test-taking, study and career skills through individual and group counseling was examined. Sixty-nine percent of the program participants attained a cumulative GPA ≥ 2.0 by the end of the intervention compared to 43% of the control group. Further, 55% of the original program participants remained successful through the following semester compared to 28% of the control group. Though retention was relatively better for program participants, concomitant improvement in study skills was not reported. Alternative explanations for improved retention are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
CastA. D., & BurkeP. J. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80(3), 1041–1068.
3.
ChemersM.HuL., & GarciaB. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55–64.
4.
ColemanH. L. K., & FreedmanA. M. (1996). Effects of a structured group intervention on the achievement of academically at-risk undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 631–636.
5.
ForemanJ.WilkieC., & KeilenK. (1990). Fostering the success of students who are experiencing academic probation at a small liberal arts college. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 371–372.
6.
GoldenB. R.CorazziniJ. G., & GradyP. (1993). Current practice of group therapy at university counseling centers: A national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 228–230.
7.
Gray-LittleB.WilliamsV. S. L., & HancockT. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 443–451.
8.
HudesmanJ.AvramidesB.LovedayC.WaberT., & WendellA. (1983). The effects of academic contracting and semi-structured counseling sessions on GPA for students in academic difficulty. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 278–279.
9.
KaderaS. W.LambertM. J., & AndrewsA. A. (1996). How much therapy is really enough: A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. Journal of Psychotherapy: Practice and Research, 5, 1–22.
10.
KrinerL. S., & ShribergA. (1992). Counseling center interventions with low achievers. NASPA Journal, 30, 39–42.
11.
LambertM. J., & Cattani-ThompsonK. (1996). Current findings regarding the effectiveness of counseling: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 601–608.
12.
MealeyD. L. (1990). Understanding the motivation problems of at-risk college students. Journal of Reading, 33, 598–601.
13.
MultonK.BrownS., & LentR. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
14.
MunsellL., & CornwellK. (1994). Enabling students on probation to succeed. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 305–306.
15.
NelsonB.DunnR.GriggsS. A.PrimaveraL.FitzpatrickM.BaciliousZ., & MillerR. (1993). Effects of learning style intervention on college students' retention and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 364–369.
16.
NewtonF. B. (1990). Academic support seminars: A program to assist students experiencing academic difficulty. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 183–186.
17.
NistS. L.MealeyD. L.SimpsonM. L., & KrocR. (1990). Measuring the affective and cognitive growth of regularly admitted and developmental studies students using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Reading Research and Instruction, 30, 44–49.
18.
OlejnikS., & NistS. L. (1988). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 151–159.
19.
PhillipsJ., & GullyS. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802.
20.
PolanskyJ.HoranJ. J., & HanishC. (1993). Experimental construct validity of the outcomes of study skills training & career counseling as treatments for the retention of at-risk students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 488–492.
21.
RomanoJ. L., & YoungH. T. (1981). Required group counseling/study skills for academic improvement: How effective are they?Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 492–496.
22.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
23.
SchultzR. A.DickmanM. M.CampbellN. J., & SnowB. M. (1992). Assessing a short-term intervention to facilitate academic success. NASPA Journal, 30, 43–50.
24.
StanleyK. D., & MurphyM. R. (1997). A comparison of general self-efficacy with self-esteem. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123(1), 79–100.
25.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
TurnerA. L., & BerryT. R. (2000). Counseling center contributions to student retention and graduation: A longitudinal study. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 627–636.
27.
WeinsteinC. E.SchulteA. C., & PalmerD. R. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
28.
WeinsteinC. E.ZimmermanS. A., & PalmerD. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In WeinsteinC. E.GoetzE. T., & AlexanderP. A. (Eds.), Learning and study strategies issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
