Class Matters: U.S. versus U.K. Measures of Occupational Disparities in Access to Health Services and Health Status in the 2000 U.S. National Health Interview Survey
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2005
Class Matters: U.S. versus U.K. Measures of Occupational Disparities in Access to Health Services and Health Status in the 2000 U.S. National Health Interview Survey
To inform current debates over whether occupational class is causally linked to health inequities, the authors used data from the 2000 U.S. National Health Interview Survey to compare occupational disparities in access to health services, socioeconomic resources, and health status, using (1) the United Kingdom's new National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC), premised on type of labor contract (salaried vs. hourly wage) and class position (employer, self-employed, supervisory and non-supervisory employee), and (2) the conventional U.S. occupational categories, premised on status and skill. Analyses included all working-age adults (age 25 to 64) for whom data on occupation and race/ethnicity were available (N = 22,500). Risk of inadequate access to health services, poverty, and low education were two times greater for persons in NS-SEC class 5 versus class 1, compared with blue-collar versus white-collar, and for both measures persons with the worst health status were in jobs that afforded the least access to health care. Controlling for earned income and workplace health insurance markedly reduced health service disparities, especially for the NS-SEC measure, thereby implying structural characteristics of jobs are causally relevant for resources and benefits necessary to address health inequities in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PamukE.Socioeconomic Status and Health Chartbook. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md., 1998.
2.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, July 2003[original report, released in February 2004 to replace the edited version released in December 2003]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md., 2004. www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/disparitiesreport/documents/DisparitiesLtr.htm (October 10, 2004).
3.
NavarroV.MuntanerC. (eds.). Political and Economic Determinants of Population Health and Well-Being: Controversies and Developments. Baywood, Amityville, N.Y., 2004.
4.
FiscellaK.Inequalities in quality: Addressing socioeconomic, racial and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA283: 2579–2584, 2000.
5.
KriegerN.FeeE.Measuring social inequalities in health in the United States: An historical review, 1900–1950. Int. J. Health Serv. 26: 391–418, 1996.
6.
SmithJ. P.Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. J. Econ. Perspect.13: 144–166, 1999.
7.
MarmotM. G.The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity. Times Books/Henry Holt, New York, 2004.
8.
KriegerN.WilliamsD. R.MossN. E.Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu. Rev. Public Health18: 341–378, 1997.
9.
LynchJ.KaplanG.Socioeconomic position. In Social Epidemiology, ed. BerkmanL.KawachiI., pp. 13–35. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
10.
SmithG. DaveyEducation and occupational social class: Which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?J. Epidemiol. Community Health52: 153–160, 1988.
11.
DuncanG. J.Optimal indicators of socioeconomic status for health research. Am. J. Public Health92: 1151–1157, 2002.
12.
MacintyreS.Socio-economic position and health: What you observe depends on how you measure it. J. Public Health Med25: 288–294, 2003.
RoseD.O'ReillyK. (eds.). Constructing Classes: Towards a New Social Classification for the UK. Office of National Statistics, London, 1997.
15.
RoseD.PevalinD. J. (eds.). A Researcher's Guide to the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification. Sage, London, 2003.
16.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2003, with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans, Table 150. www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm (October 10, 2004).
17.
GiovinoG. A.PedersonL.TrosclairA.The prevalence of selected cigarette smoking behaviors by occupational class in the United States. In Work, Smoking, and Health: A NIOSH Scientific Workshop, June 15–16, 2000. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, D.C., 2000.
18.
BarbeauE.KriegerN.SoobaderM.-J.Working class matters: Socioeconomic deprivation, race/ethnicity, gender and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am. J. Public Health94: 269–278, 2004.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) User Guide. 2001. www.bls.gov/soc/socguide.htm (October 10, 204).
Office of Management and Budget. Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, Office of Management and Budget Directive 15. www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/ombdir15.html (October 10, 2004).
23.
ShahB. V.BarnwellB.BielerG.SUDAAN User's Manual: Software for Analysis of Correlated Data, Release 6.40. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N.C., 1995.
24.
HoltD.SmithT. M. F.SkinnerC. J.Analysis of Complex Surveys. John Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 1989.
25.
KleinbaumD. G.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1998.
26.
WrightE. O.The class analysis of poverty. Int. J. Health Serv. 25: 85–100, 1995.
27.
DreverF.DoranT.WhiteheadM.Exploring the relation between, class, gender, and self-rated general health using the new socioeconomic classification: A study using data from the 2001 census. J. Epidemiol. Community Health58: 590–596, 2004.
28.
WrightE. O.Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.
29.
KriegerN.Women and social class: A methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history. J. Epidemiol. Community Health45: 35–42, 1991.
30.
KriegerN.ChenJ. T.SelbyJ. V.Comparing individual-based and household-based measures of social class to assess class inequalities in women's health: A methodological study of 684 US women. J. Epidemiol. Community Health53: 612–623, 1999.
31.
MuntanerC.ParsonsP. E.Income, social stratification, class and private health insurance: A study of the Baltimore metropolitan area. Int. J. Health Serv. 26: 655–671, 1996.
32.
WohlfarthT.van den BrinkW.Social class and substance use disorders: The value of social class as distinct from socioeconomic status. Soc. Sci. Med.47: 51–58, 1998.
33.
SoderfeltB.DanermarkB.LarssonS.Social class and sickness absences: A comparative study of four ways to measure class. Scand. J. Soc. Med.15: 211–217, 1987.
34.
BorrellC.Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: What is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour?Soc. Sci. Med.58: 1869–1887, 2004.
35.
MuntanerC.The associations of social class and social stratification with patterns of general and mental health in a Spanish population. Int. J. Epidemiol.32: 950–958, 2003.
36.
ArberS.Class, paid employment and family roles: Making sense of structural disadvantage, gender and health status. Soc. Sci. Med.32: 425–436, 1991.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, 2nd ed, With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., November 2000. www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/uih/uih_bw/uih_1.htm (October 10, 2004).
