The development of belief discrepancy reasoning, or how people evaluate disagreeing others, was examined with forty-four college and elderly respondents. Dogmatism and IQ measures were also administered. The results showed that the elderly were significantly lower in belief discrepancy reasoning and higher in dogmatism than the college sample, despite statistically greater IQ for the former sample and controls for education. For belief discrepancy, the elderly sample did not evidence intolerance, but rather relativism and open-mindedness toward disagreeing others. Implications for the construct validation of belief discrepancy and senescent intolerance are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SelmanR., Toward A Structural Analysis of Developing Interpersonal Relations Concepts: Research With Normal and Disturbed Pre-Adolescent Boys, in Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 10, PickA., (ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1976.
2.
DamonW., The Social World of the Child, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, California, 1977.
3.
EnrightR.FranklinC., and ManheimL., Children's Distributive Justice Reasoning; A Standardized and Objective Scale, Developmental Psychology, 16, pp. 193–202, 1980.
4.
EnrightR. and LapsleyD., Judging Others Who Hold Opposite Beliefs: The Development and Belief Discrepancy Reasoning, Child Development, 52, pp. 1053–1063, 1981.
5.
GlennN., Aging and Conservatism, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, September, pp. 176–186, 1974.
6.
RiegalK. and RiegalR., A Study of Changes of Attitudes and Interests During Later Years of Life, Vita Humana, 3, pp. 177–206, 1960.
7.
MongeR., Age Differences in Dogmatism and Anxiety From the 20's to the 70's, unpublished manuscript, 1972.
8.
KouninK., Experimental Studies of Rigidity, Character and Personality, 9, pp. 251–282, 1941.
9.
RokeachM., The Open and Closed Mind, Basic Books, New York, 1960.
10.
RokeachM., The Nature and Meaning of Dogmatism, Psychological Review, 61, pp. 194–204, 1954.
11.
AndersonC., A Developmental Study of Dogmatism During Adolescence with Reference to Sex Differences, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, pp. 132–135, 1962.
12.
PlantW., Longitudinal Changes in Intolerance and Authoritarianism for Subjects Differing in Amount of College Education Over Forty Years, Genetic Psychology Monographs, 72, pp. 247–287, 1965.
13.
PannesE., The Relationship Between Self Acceptance and Dogmatism in Junior-Senior High School Students, Journal of Educational Sociology, 36, pp. 419–426, 1963.
14.
YussenS. and HiebertE., Moral Reasoning in the Adult Years, paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1979.
15.
BielbyD. and PapaliaD., Moral Development and Perceptual Role-Taking Egocentrism: Their Development and Interrelationship Across the Lifespan, Aging and Human Development, 6, pp. 293–308, 1975.
16.
BotwinickJ., Aging and Behavior, Springer, New York, 1973.
17.
RestJ., The Stage Concept in Moral Judgment Research, unpublished manuscript, 1977.
18.
FlavellJ., Stage Related Properties of Cognitive Development, Cognitive Psychology, 2, pp. 421–453, 1971.
19.
VacchianoR.StraussP., and HochmanL., The Open and Closed Mind: A Review of Dogmatism, Psychological Bulletin, 71, pp. 261–273, 1968.
20.
AmmonsR. and AmmonsC., The Quick Test (QT): Provisional Manual, Psychological Reports, 11, Monograph supplement I-VII, pp. 111–161, 1962.
21.
GendreauL.RoachT., and GendreauP., Assessing the Intelligence of Aged Persons: Report on the Quick Test, Psychological Reports, 32, pp. 475–480, 1973.
22.
LevineN., Validation of the Quick Test for Intelligence Screening of the Elderly, Psychological Reports, 29, pp. 167–172, 1971.
23.
SchaieK., A General Model for the Study of Developmental Problems, Psychological Bulletin, 64, pp. 92–107, 1965.
24.
BaltesP., Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Sequences in the Study of Age and Generation Effects, Human Development, 11, pp. 145–171, 1968.
