A technical writing course can simulate the work situation and develop in students the uniquely human faculty of imagination. Whole-group effort is needed to sustain the fiction that the course is a job. Special presentation by the instructor of traditional assignments is essential. Such a course prepares students for demands made on the job. More importantly, the course, by emphasizing the act of imagining, enables students to progress from fitting facts into given formats to designing reports for specific communication situations. Because of this emphasis on imagination, the course is a humanities offering as well as a technical complement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MathesJ. C. and StevensonD. W., Completing the Bridge: Report Writing in “Real Life” Engineering Courses, Engineering Education, 67:2, pp. 154–158, 1976.
2.
BrittonW. E., The Trouble with Technical Writing is Freshman English, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 4:2, pp. 127–131, 1974.
3.
MinorD. E., Teaching the Technical Writing Proposal, The Technical Writing Teacher, 7:1, pp. 24–27, 1979.
4.
StrattonC. R., Technical Writing: What It Is and What It Isn't, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 9:1, pp. 9–16, 1979.
5.
GibsonW., The Writing Teacher as a Dumb Reader, College Composition and Communication, 30:2, pp. 192–195, 1979.
6.
TebeauxE., Achieving the Essential Goals of Technical Writing — Role Playing Won't Do It!, The American Business Communication Association Bulletin, 41:3, pp. 1–4, 1978.
7.
CarterR., Technical Writing: A Framework for Change, The Technical Writing Teacher, 7:1, pp. 39–42, 1979.
8.
The Health Professional as Translator: Transmitting Specialized Information to the Nonspecialist, Illinois Environmental Health Journal, 7:5, November/December 1979.
