This study assessed the subjective effects associated with firewalking, and compared them with the subjective effects associated with hypnosis and a baseline condition (eyes closed sitting quietly). Twenty-seven subjects, who walked over hot coals during a firewalk ceremony, completed questionnaires about what they subjectively experienced during the firewalk. Their experiences were subsequently compared with those of subjects (n = 246) who experienced hypnosis and a baseline condition. The data suggested that firewalking, as assessed across all subjects, is characterized by high levels of volitional control and rationality, and a very absorbed attentional style wherein the mind is one-pointed, and consciousness is characterized by strong feelings of joy and high levels of internal dialogue. Firewalking was also found to be associated with significantly more joy, one-pointedness of thought, absorption, and internal dialogue than hyponosis or the baseline condition. In addition, a cluster analysis suggested two subgroups of firewalkers based on their subjective experiences of the firewalk. Interestingly, analyzing the attentional experiences among these firewalkers who got slightly burned, versus those who did not, revealed significant differences. A one-pointed and absorbed attentional focus may be the critical variable for the fire immunity observed in firewalking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
VilenskayaL., Firewalking: A New Fad, A Scientific Riddle, Or an Excellent Tool for Healing, Spiritual, Group and Psychological Development, Psi Research, 3, pp. 102–118, 1984.
GuileyR. E., Harper's Encyclopedia of Mysticism and Paranormal Experience, HarperCollins, New York, 1991.
4.
RobbinsA., Unlimited Power, Fawcett Columbine, New York, 1986.
5.
CoeM. R., Fire-walking and Related Behavior, Psychological Record, 7, pp. 101–110, 1957.
6.
WalkerJ., The Amateur Scientist: Drops of Water Done on a Hot Skillet and the Experimenter Walks on Hot Coals, Scientific American, 237, pp. 126–131, 1977.
7.
StillingsD., Observations on Firewalking, Psi Research, 4, pp. 51–59, 1985.
8.
GaddisV. H., Mysterious Fires and Lights, David McKay, New York, 1967.
9.
CoeM. R., Safely Across the Fiery Pit, Fate, 31, pp. 84–86, 1978.
10.
TartC. T., Firewalk, Parapsychological Review, 18, pp. 1–5, 1987.
11.
BlakeJ., Attribution of Power and the Transformation of Fear: An Empirical Study of Firewalking, Psi Research, 4, pp. 62–88, 1985.
12.
BrownD. P.FrommE., Hypnotherapy and Hypnoanalysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986.
13.
HilgardE. R., The Experience of Hypnosis, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1965.
14.
HilgardE. R., Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action, John Wiley, New York, 1977.
15.
PekalaR. J., Quantifying Consciousness: An Empirical Approach, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
16.
PekalaR. J., Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI), Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1991.
17.
PekalaR. J., Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire (DAQ), Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1991.
18.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Hypnotizability, Absorption, and Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, pp. 80–88, 1988.
19.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Variations in Phenomenological Experience as a Function of Hypnosis and Hypnotic Susceptibility: A Replication, British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, pp. 17–22, 1989.
20.
PelakaR. J.ForbesE., Hypnoidal Effects Associated with Several Stress Management Techniques, Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, pp. 121–132, 1988.
21.
PekalaR. J.LevineR., Quantifying States of Consciousness via en Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 2, pp. 51–71, 1982.
22.
PekalaR. J.NultonL., Development of an Instrument to Measure Affective State, Manuscript in preparation, 1992.
23.
PekalaR. J.ForbesE.ContriscianiE.ContriscianiP. A., Assessing the Phenomenological Effects of Several Stress Management Strategies, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 88, pp. 265–281, 1989.
24.
PekalaR. J.BieberS. L., Operationalizing Pattern Approaches to Consciousness: An Analysis of the Phenomenological Patterns of Consciousness Among Individuals of Differing Susceptibility, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, pp. 303–320, 1990.
25.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Phenomenological Patterns of Consciousness During Hypnosis: Relevance to Cognition and Individual Differences, Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, pp. 1–20, 1989.
26.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F., Retrospective Phenomenological Assessment: Mapping Consciousness in Reference to Specific Stimulus Conditions, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, pp. 247–274, 1983.
27.
TartC. T., States of Consciousness, Dutton, New York, 1975.
28.
PekalaR. J.NaglerR., The Assessment of Hypnoidal States: Rationale and Clinical Application, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, pp. 231–236, 1989.
29.
PekalaR. J.ForbesE., Subjective Effects Associated with Several Stress Management Strategies: With Reference to Attention, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, pp. 39–44, 1990.
30.
PekalaR. J., Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory, unpublished psychological test, 1982.
31.
PekalaR. J., Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire, unpublished test, 1985.
32.
PekalaR. J.LevineR. L., Mapping Consciousness: Development of an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 1, pp. 29–47, 1981.
33.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Succeptibility by a Self-Report Phenomenological State Instrument, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, pp. 114–121, 1984.
34.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility via a Self-Report Instrument: A Replication, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, pp. 57–65, 1987.
35.
PekalaR. J.SteinbergJ.KumarV. K., Measurement of Phenomenological Experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, pp. 983–989, 1986.
36.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F.LevineR. L., Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience: States of Consciousness as a Function of Absorption, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp. 125–132, 1985.
37.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Phenomenological Variations in Attention Across Low, Medium, and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 7, pp. 303–314, 1988.
38.
ShorR. E.OrneE. C., The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1962.
39.
FriedR., The Hyperventilation Syndrome: Research and Clinical Treatment, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1987.
40.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., The Differential Organization of the Structures of Consciousness During Hypnosis and a Baseline Condition, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, pp. 515–539, 1986.
41.
GilmanL.RoseA. J., APL: An Interactive Approach, John Wiley, New York, 1974.
42.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., A Short Program for Assessing the Equality of Two Independent Correlation Matrices, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, pp. 175–177, 1985.
43.
JennrichR. J., An Asymptotic Chi-square Test for the Equality of Two Correlation Matrices, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, pp. 904–912, 1970.
44.
HartiganJ. A., Clustering Algorithms, John Wiley, New York, 1975.
45.
WilkinsonL., SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, SYSTAT, Evanston, Illinois, 1988.
46.
BowersK. S., Do the Stanford Scales Tap the “Classic Suggestion Effect?”, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, pp. 42–53, 1981.
47.
PekalaR. J., Hypnotic Types: Evidence from a Cluster Analysis of Phenomenal Experience, Contemporary Hypnosis, 8, pp. 95–104, 1991.
48.
BradburnN.RipsL.ShevellS., Answering Autobiographical Questions: The Impact of Memory and Inference on Surveys, Science, 236, pp. 157–161, 1987.
49.
DunckerK., On Problem Solving, Psychological Monographs, 58 (5, Whole Number 270), 1945.
