The process of developing concepts of time continues from age 5 to 11 years (Zakay, 1998). This study sought the representation mode in which children could best express time concepts, especially the proper arrangement of events in a logical and temporal order. Usually, temporal order is examined and taught by 2D (2-dimensional) pictorial scripts. Using Bruner's (1973, 1986, 1990) representation stages, we tested the comparative effectiveness of VR (Virtual Reality) as a mode of representation on children's conception of sequential time with the pictorial representation mode, the oral, and textual modes. The study involved 65 participants, aged 4 to 10, in 2 groups: kindergarten and school children. The study examined their ability to arrange episodes of a scenario in which a temporal order exists, using the different modes of representation. The findings demonstrate substantial differences in the temporal order arrangement between the modes of representation. In the 3D VR representation, the subjects had a smaller number of errors than in the other representations. These findings suggest that even though the pictorial mode is the most common way of examining and expressing temporal sequence, we should establish new ways of presenting sequencing so that children will be better able to achieve their full cognitive and academic potential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarabS. A.HayK. E.BarnettM., & SquireK. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.
2.
BeykirchH. L. (1990). Iconicity and sign vocabulary acquisition. American Annals of the Deaf, 135(4), 306–311.
3.
BornensM. T. (1990). Problems brought about by “reading” a sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49(2), 189–226.
4.
BrickenM., & ByrneC. M. (1992). Summer student in virtual reality: A pilot study on educational applications of virtual reality technology (WA technical publication no. R-92–1). Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Human Interface Technology Laboratory of the Washington Center. [On-line]. Available: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-92–1/
5.
BrownC. J., & HurtigR. R. (1983). Children's discourse competence: An evaluation of the development of inferential processes. Discourse Processes, 6(4), 353–375.
6.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning Cambridge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BrunerJ. S. (1973). The growth of representation processes in childhood. In AnlinJ. (Ed.), Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing (pp. 313–324). New York: Norton.
9.
CalvertS. L. (1999). The form of thought. In SigelI. E. (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 452–470). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CarniE., & FrenchL. A. (1984). The acquisition of before and after. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 394–403.
11.
ClarkM. S.MarscharkM., & KarchmerM. (2001). Context, cognition and deafness.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
12.
DarrowM. S. (1995). Increasing research and development of VR in education and special education. VR In The School, 1(3), 5–8.
13.
DenisM. (1991). Image and cognition.City?, State: Harvester Wheatsheaf Hertfordshire.
14.
FivushR., & MandlerJ. M. (1985). Developmental changes in the understanding of temporal sequence. Child Development, 56(6), 1437–1446.
15.
FrenchL. A. (1989). Young children's responses to “when” questions: Issues of directionality. Child Development, 60, 225–236.
16.
FujisakiH. (1998). How do preschoolers describe their daily lives? The formation of generalized event representation and the variability of daily life Activities. Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 221–231. PsycLIT AN 1998–03197–005.
17.
GeF.FuxiF., & FanL. (1984). A Study on the development of children's cognition of time-sequence: I. Acta-Psychologica Sinica, 16(2), 165–173. PsycLIT 1985–14036–001.
18.
GobboC. (1987). Children's understanding of stories: Temporal sequence of events and casual influences. Eta-evolutiva, 26, 5–17.
19.
GobboC. (1990). Children's ability to complete stories: Mode of presentation oral vs. pictorial. Eta-evolutiva, 37, 30–42.
20.
HarperB.HedbergJ. G., & WrightR. (2000). Who benefits from virtuality?Computers & Education, 34(3–4) 163–176.
21.
HedbergN. L., & Stoel-GammonC. (1986). Narrative analysis: Clinical procedures. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(1), 58–69.
22.
HeimM. (1992). The metaphysics of virtual reality.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
HeledM. (2004). The impact of virtual reality on the awareness of teenagers to social and emotional experiences of immigrant classmates. Thesis submitted to the School of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel (in Hebrew).
24.
KaufmanA., & KaufmanN. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
25.
ManriqueF. (1997, March). Effects of spatial ability levels and presentation platform on performance of a pictured rotation task. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
MintzR., & NachmiasR. (1998). Teaching science & technology in the knowledge age. Computers in Education, 45/46, 25–31 (in Hebrew).
28.
MousaviS. Y.LowR., & SwellerJ. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319–334.
29.
O'ConnellB. G., & GerardA. B. (1985). Scripts and scraps: The development of sequential understanding. Child Development, 56(3), 671–681.
30.
OsbergK. M. (1995). Virtual reality and education: Where imagination and experience meet. VR In The Schools, 1(2), 1–3.
31.
OttavianiB. F., & BlackJ. B. (1994, February). The effects of multimedia presentation formats on the spatial recall of a narrative. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville.
32.
PassigD., & EdenS. (2000). Enhancing the induction skill of deaf and hard-of-hearing children with virtual reality technology. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 277–285.
33.
PassigD., & EdenS. (2000). Improving flexible thinking in deaf and hard-of-hearing children with virtual reality technology. American Annals of the Deaf, 145(3), 286–291.
34.
PiagetJ. (1969). The child's conception of time.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35.
PineS. J., & GrimesK. B. (1985, November). Classification skills: Visual and verbal presentation modes. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Washington.
36.
PsotkaJ. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 23(5–6), 405–431.
37.
SchankR. C., & AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding.New York: L. Erlbaum.
38.
VasuE. S., & HoweA. C. (1989). The effect of visual and verbal modes of presentation on children's retention of images and words. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 401–407.
39.
WechslerD. (1974). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children—Revised.New York: The Psychological Corporation.
40.
ZakayD. (1998) Psychological time.Ministry of Defense, Tel Aviv (in Hebrew).
