Institutional and Individual Autonomy: Investigating Predictors of Attitudes toward Institutional Care in China

Abstract

This study examines the institutional and attitudinal changes in elder care homes in Tianjin, China. Based on a survey conducted in 2001 with 61 elder home managers and 265 elder residents, this study examines 1) factors that influence elder home managers' views about elder home development and 2) elders' evaluation of elder home quality and their levels of willingness to stay in such homes. Findings show that elder home managers view their autonomy in financing and administration as a very important factor for future development of an elder home industry. Elders' overall evaluation of elder home quality was high. Elders' willingness to stay in elder homes was related to two factors: their living arrangements prior to elder home placement and their assessment of the cost involved for such care. This suggests that the limited level of autonomy in private elder home administration and financing is hindering the development of elder homes. As adult children become increasingly unavailable due to the one-child policy and geographic mobility, institutional care for aging parents is likely to become a major option for familial care in China. The government should grant greater autonomy to private elder homes in order to encourage elder home development.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnsberger

Fox

Zhang

Gui

(2000). Population and the need for long term care: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 207–227.

Binney

E. A.

Estes

C. L.

Humphers

S. E.

(1993). Informalization and community care. In Estes

C. L.

Swan

J. H.

, (Eds.). The long term care crisis: Elders trapped in the No-care Zone (pp. 155–170). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chen

S. Y.

(1996). Social policy of the economic state and community care in Chinese culture: Aging, family, urban change, and the socialist welfare pluralism. Avebury: Brookfield.

Estes

C. L.

Linkins

K. W.

(2001). The political economy of health work. In Estes

C. L.

(Eds.), Social policy & aging: A critical perspective (pp. 217–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Diessenbacher

(1989). The generation contract, pension schemes, birth control and economic growth: A European model for the Third World? Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 4, 357–375.

Estes

C. L.

(2001). Social policy & aging: A critical Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Greene

V. L.

Ondrich

J. I.

(1990). Risk factors for elder home admissions and exits: A discrete-time hazard function approach, Journal of Gerontology, 45(6), 250–258.

Liang

(2000). China: Population and old age support. In Bengtson

V. L.

Kim

K. D.

Myers

G. C.

Eun

K. S.

(Eds.), Aging in east and west: Families, states, and the elderly (pp. 59–93). LOCATION?: Springer Publishing Company.

Han

Jun-Xin

(Eds.). (1986). Tianjin Population Statistics. Tianjin, China: Nankai University Press. Available: Http://news.enorth.com.cn/system/2004/04/10/000766228.shtm1

10.

Harrison

J. D.

(1997). Housing for the aging population of Singapore. Ageing International, 32–48.

11.

Law 110.com. (1987). Regulations on residential construction GBJ96-86. [On-line]. Available: http://www.law.com/guihua/190002.htm

12.

Liu

Coughlin

McBride

(1991). Predicting elder home admission and length of stay, Medical Care, 29, 125–141.

13.

Newman

S. J.

Struyk

Wright

Rice

(1990). Overwhelming odds: Caregiving and the risk of institutionalization, Journal of Gerontology, 45, 73–183.

14.

Pearlman

D. N.

Crown

W. H.

(1992). Alternative sources of social support and their impact on institutional risk, The Gerontologist, 32, 527–535.

15.

Quadagno

(2005). Aging and the life course. Boston: McGraw Hill.

16.

Shang

(2001). Moving toward a multi-level and multi-pilar system: Changes in institutional care in two Chinese cities. Journal of Social Policy, 30(2), 259–281.

17.

Streib

G. F.

(1987). Old age in sociocultural context: China and the United States. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 95–210.

18.

Tianjin Bureau of Population Statistics. (2001). Statistical Yearbook of Tianjin. Beijing, China: Publishing Company of China's Statistics.

19.

Tsui

Rich

(2002). The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban China. Gender & Society, 16(1), 74–92.

20.

(1994). Status quo and problems of old age support by youth and adult within the family. Sociological Research, 4, 80–84. [in Chinese]

21.

Zeng

Liu

Y. Z.

Zhang

C. Y.

Xiao

Z. Y.

(2005). Analysis on determinants of healthy longivity in China. Beijing, China: Beijing Gerontological Society.

22.

Zhan

H. J.

(2000). The inverted pyramid: The effect of the one-child policy and economic reforms in China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation at the University of Kansas.

23.

Zhan

H. J.

Montgomery

R. J. V.

(2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints Gender and Society, 17(2), 209–229.

24.

Zhan

H. J.

(2004). Willingness and expectations: Intergenerational differences in attitudes toward filial responsibility in China. Journal of Marriage and Family Review, 36(1/2), 175–200.

25.

Zhan

H. J.

Liu

G. Y.

Bai

H. G.

(2005). Recent development of Chinese nursing homes: A reconciliation of traditional culture. Ageing International, 30(2), 167–187.