This three-phase study characterized, validated, and applied community capacity domains in a health communication project evaluation in Zambia. Phase I explored community capacity domains from community members' perspectives (16 focus groups, 14 in-depth interviews, 4 sites. These were validated in Phase II with 720 randomly selected adults. The validated domains were incorporated into a program evaluation survey (2,462 adult women, 2,354 adult men; October 2009). The results indicated that the intervention had direct effects on community capacity; enhanced capacity was then associated with having taken community action for health. Finally, community capacity mediated by community action and controlling for confounders, had a significant effect on women's contraceptive use, children's bed net use, and HIV testing. The results indicate that building community capacity served as a means to an end—improved health behaviors and reported collective action for health—and an end-in-itself, both of which are essential to overall wellbeing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RaeburnJ.AkermanM.ChuengsatiansupK.MejiaF., and OladepoO., Community Capacity Building and Health Promotion in a Globalized World, Health Promotion International, 21: Suppl 1, pp. 84–90, 2006.
2.
ParkerE.LichtensteinR.SchulzA.IsraelB.SchorkM.SteinmanJ., Disentangling Measures of Individual Perceptions of Community Social Dynamics: Results of a Community Survey, Health Education and Behavior, 28: 4, pp. 462–486, 2001.
3.
WallersteinN., What is the Evidence on Effectiveness of Empowerment to Improve Health?WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2006. Health Evidence Network report, retrieved February 1, 2010 from http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf
4.
PutnamR., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1993.
5.
LaverackG. and WallersteinN., Measuring Community Empowerment: A Fresh Look at Organizational Domains, Health Promotion International, 16: 2, pp. 179–185, 2001.
6.
HarkinsT.DrasbekC.ArroyoJ., and McQuestionM., The Health Benefits of Social Mobilization: Experiences with Community-Based Integrated Management of Childhood Illness in Chao, Peru and San Luis, Honduras, Promotion and Education, 15: 2, pp. 15–20, 2008.
7.
EngF. and ParkerE., Measuring Community Competence in the Mississippi Delta: Interface Between Program Evaluation and Empowerment, Health Education Quarterly, 21: 2, pp. 199–220, 1994.
8.
BanduraA., Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, pp. 75–78, 2000.
GibbonM.LabonteR., and LaverackG., Evaluating Community Capacity, Health and Social Care in the Community, 10: 6, pp. 485–91, 2000.
11.
BoppM. and BoppJ., Welcome to the Swamp: Addressing Community Capacity in Ecohealth Research and Intervention, EcoHealth, Suppl. 1, pp. SU24–SU34, 2002.
12.
FigueroaM.KincaidD. L.RaniM., and LewisG., Communication for Social Change: An Integrated Model for Measuring the Process and Its Outcomes (Communication for Social Change, Working Paper), Johns Hopkins University, Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, Maryland and The Rockefeller Foundation, New York, 2002.
13.
JacksonS.CleverlyS.PolandB.BurmanD.EdwardsR., and RobertsonA., Working with Toronto Neighbourhoods Toward Developing Indicators of Community Capacity, Health Promotion International, 18: 4, pp. 339–350, 2003.
14.
McKnightJ. and KretzmannJ., Mapping Community Capacity, Asset-Based Community Development Institute and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1996.
15.
The Aspen Institute, Measuring Community Capacity Building—A Work-Book in Progress for Rural Communities (Version 3), Washington, DC, 1996.
16.
ParksW.Grey-FelderD.HuntJ., and ByrneA., Who Measures Change? An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change, Communication for Social Change Consortium, New York, 2005.
17.
RifkinS.MullerF., and BichmanW., Primary Health Care: On Measuring Participation, Social Science and Medicine, 26: 9, pp. 931–940, 1988.
18.
StoneW. and HughesJ., Understanding Community Strengths, Family Matters, 61, pp. 62–67, 2002.
LaverackG., Evaluating Community Capacity: Visual Representation and Interpretation, Community Development Journal, 41: 3, pp. 266–276, 2006.
21.
NatcherD. and HickeyC., Putting the Community Back into Community-Based Resource Management: A Criteria and Indicators Approach to Sustainability, Human Organization, 61: 4, pp. 350–362, 2002.
22.
ThompsonD.LittlejohnsL., and SmithN., Caught in the Web: Piloting a Methodology to Assess Community Capacity in a Rural Heart Health Project, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 15: 2, pp. 35–55, 2000.
23.
World Bank, The Effectiveness of World Bank Support for Community-Based and -Driven Development: An OED Evaluation, World Bank Publications, Washington, DC, 2005.
24.
HaweP.NoortM.KingL., and JordensC., Multiplying Health Gains: The Critical Role of Capacity-Building within Health Promotion Programs, Health Policy, 39, pp. 29–42, 1997.
25.
MacLellan-WrightM.AndersonD.BarberS.SmithN.CantinB.FelixR., and RaineK., The Development of Measures of Community Capacity for Community-Based Funding Programs in Canada, Health Promotion International, 22: 4, pp. 299–306, 2007.
Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC), University of Zambia, and Macro International Inc., Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2007. CSO and Macro International Inc, Calverton, Maryland, 2009.
28.
ChaskinR., Building Community Capacity: A Definitional Framework and Case Studies from a Comprehensive Community Initiative, Urban Affairs Review, 36, pp. 291–323, 2001.
29.
EasterlingD.GallagherK.DriskoJ., and JohnsonT., Promoting Health by Building Community Capacity: Evidence and Implications for Grantmakers, The Colorado Trust, Denver, Colorado, 1998.
30.
GoodmanR.SpeersM.McLeroyK.FawcettS.KeglerM.ParkerE., Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement, Health Education and Behavior25: 3, pp. 258–278, 1998.
31.
DartJ. and DaviesR., A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique, American Journal of Evaluation, 24: 2, pp. 137–155, 2003.
32.
MilesM. and HubermanA., Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.
33.
BernardH., Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 2012.
34.
SenA., Development as Freedom, Anchor Books, New York, 1999.
35.
BaronR. and KennyD., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 6, pp. 1173–1182, 1986.
36.
SmithN.LittlejohnsL., and ThompsonD., Shaking Out the Cobwebs: Insights into Community Capacity and Its Relation to Health Outcomes, Community Development Journal, 36: 1, pp. 30–41, 2001.
