This article is concerned with understanding the relationship of discourses of death with the social philosophy of Michel Foucault. Foucault's theoretical tools “make sense” of discourses of death in institutions such as care homes. While our responses to death and dying would seem to be very personal and therefore individually determined, they are, in fact, greatly influenced by the beliefs of individuals and “experts” who work in institutions providing care. Therefore, this article not only examines the limitations of bio-medicalized discourses of death and dying, but importantly emphasizes the importance of Foucault's conceptual tools to methodologically interrogate how death is managed in institutional care.
AriesP. (1981). The hour of death. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2.
ArmstrongD. (1983). Political anatomy of the body: Medical knowledge in Britain in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BaumanZ. (1992). Survival as a social construct. Theory, Culture and Society, 99, 1–36.
4.
BiggsS. & PowellJ. (2000). Surveillance and elder abuse: The rationalities and technologies of community care. InJournal of Contemporary Health, 4 (1), 43–49.
5.
BiggsS. & PowellJ. (2001). A Foucauldian analysis of old age and the power of social welfare. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 12 (2), 93–112.
6.
Brooke-RossR. (1986) quoted in LanganM., & LeeP. (Eds.). (1988). Radical social work today. London: Unwin Hyman.
7.
ChristC. (1993). Painting the dead: Portraiture and necrophilia in Victorian art and poetry, In GoodwinS. W. & BronfenE. (Eds.), Death and representation (pp. 131–151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
CloughR. (1988). Practice, politics and power in social service departments. Aldershot: Gower.
9.
CrossleyN. (2001). The social body: Habit, identity and desire. London: Sage.
10.
DavidsonA. (1986). Archaeology, genealogy, ethics. In HoyD. (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
12.
FoucaultM. (1973). The birth of the clinic. London: Routledge.
13.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.
14.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.
15.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject of power. In DreyfusH. & RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester.
16.
GervinsK. G. (1986). Redefining death. New Haven: Yale University Press.
17.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
HadleyR. & CloughR. (1996). Care in chaos. London: Cassel.
19.
HawkinsA. H. (1990). Constructing death: Three pathographies about dying. Omega, 22 (4), 301–317.
20.
KastenbaumR. (1988). Safe death in the postmodern world. In GilmoreA. & GilmoreS. (Eds.), A safer death. London: Plenum.
21.
KastenbaumR. (2005). Death, society and human experience (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
22.
MellorP. A. & ShillingC. (1993). Modernity, self-identity and the sequestration of death. Sociology, 27 (7), 711–731.
23.
MorganD. H. J. & ScottS. (1993). Bodies in a social landscape. In MorganD. H. J. & ScottS. (Eds.), Body matters: Essays on the sociology of the body. London: The Falmer Press.
24.
PowellJ. L. (2001). Theorizing gerontology: The case of old age, professional power and social policy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Aging & Identity, 6 (3), 117–135.
25.
PowellJ. L. (2005). Social theory and aging. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
26.
PowellJ. L. & BiggsS. (2000). Managing old age: The disciplinary web of power, surveillance and normalization. Journal of Aging & Identity, 5 (1), 3–13.
27.
SeifertJ. (1993). Is “brain dead” actually death?The Monist in the International Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry, 76, 175–202.
28.
ShillingC. (1993). The body and social theory. London: Sage.
29.
WalterT. (1999). On bereavement. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
WelchM. (2005). Ironies of imprisonment. London: Sage.
