The focus of this autoethnography is the often hidden and marginalized experience of pregnancy loss. Through an exploration of “the search for meaning” in the aftermath of three different losses over a period of 9 years, I seek to problematize Western discourses which, influenced by Enlightenment ideals, adhere to linear notions of progress. Such discourses can be argued to sustain an imperative to create positive meaning from traumatic life experience, to gain beneficial insight from suffering, and ultimately to triumph over adversity. In articulating a messier and more ambiguous story, the difficulties of living through and voicing experience, which fails to conform to such a framework, is highlighted.
DudenB. (1999). The fetus on the “further shore”: Toward a history of the unborn. In MorganL. M. & MichaelsM. W. (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 13–25). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
DurkheimE. (1915/1971). The elementary forms of the religious life. [Translated by Joseph Ward Swain]. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
15.
EllisC. (1998). Exploring loss through autoethnographic inquiry: Autoethnographic stories, co-constructed narratives, and interactive interviews. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 49–61). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel (Taylor and Francis).
16.
EllisC. (1999). Heartfelt autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 669–683.
17.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about ethnography.Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc).
18.
EllisC. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.
19.
EtheringtonK. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in research.London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
20.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
21.
FoucaultM. (1976/1998). The will to knowledge: History of sexuality: 1.London: Penguin.
22.
FrankA. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
FurediF. (2003). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age.London: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group).
24.
GannonS. (2006). The im(possibilities) of writing the self-writing: French poststructural theory and autoethnography. Critical Methodologies, 6(4), 474–495.
25.
GillJ. (2006). Modern confessional writing: New critical essays.London: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group).
26.
GoodallH. L. (2000). Writing the new ethnography.Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
27.
GroszE. (1995). Space, time and perversion: Essay's on the politics of bodies.New York: Routledge.
28.
HughesP.TurtonP.HopperE., & EvansC. D. H. (2002). Assessment of guidelines for good practice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study. Lancet, 360(9327), 114–118.
29.
Janoff-BulmanR., & BergM. (1998). Disillusionment and the creation of value: From traumatic losses to existential gains. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 35–47). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel (Taylor and Francis).
30.
LangerL. L. (1991). Holocaust testimonies: The ruins of memory.New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
31.
LayneL. L. (1996). Never such innocence again: Irony, nature and technoscience in narratives of pregnancy loss. In CecilR. (Ed.), The anthropology of pregnancy loss: Comparative studies in miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death (pp. 131–152). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
32.
LennoxA. (1992). Why.Diva: RCA.
33.
LovellA. (1997). Death at the beginning of life. In FieldF.HockeyJ., & SmallN. (Eds.), Death, gender and ethnicity (pp. 29–51). London: Routledge.
34.
MalacridaC. (1998). Mourning the dreams: How parents create meaning from miscarriage, stillbirth & early infant death.Edmonton: Qual Institute Press.
35.
MartinL. H.GutmanH., & HuttonP. H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
36.
McNayM. B., & FlemingJ. E. E. (1999). Forty years of obstetric ultrasound 1957-1997: From A-scope to three dimensions. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 25(1), 3–56.
37.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination.London: Oxford University Press.
38.
Reed-DanahayD. E. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social.Oxford: Berg.
39.
ReidM. (1991). The diffusion of four prenatal screening tests across Europe.London: King's Fund Centre for Health Services Development.
40.
RicoeurP. (1995). Evil, a challenge to philosophy and theology. In Figuring the sacred: Religion, narrative & imagination.Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
41.
SontagS. (2001). Against interpretation.London: Vintage Books.
42.
SparkesA. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? In BochnerA. & EllisC. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 209–232). New York: AltaMira.
SqueM.LongT.PayneS.RocheW., & SpeckP. (2008). The UK postmortem organ retention crisis: A qualitative study of its impact on parents. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(2), 71–77.
45.
StaceyJ. (1997). Teratologies: A cultural study of cancer.London: Routledge.
46.
Van DijckJ. (2005). The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging.Seattle: University of Washington Press.
47.
VickersM. H. (2002). Researchers as storytellers: Writing on the edge—and without a safety net. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(5), 608–621.
48.
WallS. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53.
49.
WilkinsonI. (2005). Suffering: A sociological introduction.Cambridge: Polity Press.
50.
WilliamsC.AldersonP., & FarsidesB. (2001). Conflicting perceptions of the fetus: person, patient, “nobody,” commodity?New Genetics and Society, 20(3), 225–238.
