This study explored the loss and grief experiences of third culture kids (TCKs), persons who accompanied their parents to live all or part of their childhood outside the country for which they hold a passport. The study used a qualitative, naturalistic design, incorporating interview and e-mail data collection. Forty-three TCKs participated in the study. Among the findings of the study are: losses that TCKs experience are often ambiguous and the grief of TCKs is frequently disenfranchised. Many of the losses (both hidden and recognized) were categorized as related to persons, places, pets, and possessions. In addition, existential losses, particularly the loss of meaning related to various aspects of themselves, were identified. More specifically, these existential losses focused on safety and trust, the loss personal identity, and the loss of home.
BarringerC. F. (2000). Counseling third culture kids. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Counseling Association, San Antonio, TX). [On-line]. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov ERIC #: ED451459.
2.
BossP. (2004). Ambiguous loss. In WashF. & McGoldrickM. (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (2nd ed.) (pp. 237–246), New York: Norton.
3.
CockburnL. (2002). Children and young people living in changing worlds: The process of assessing and understanding the ‘Third Culture Kid.’School Psychology International, 23, 475–485.
4.
CrenshawD. A. (2002). The disenfranchised grief of children. In DokaK. J. (Ed.) Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice (pp. 293–306). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
5.
DokaK. J. (2002). Introduction. In DokaK.J. (Ed.) Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice (pp. 5–22). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
6.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
7.
ErlandsonD. A. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to method.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
GilbertK. R. (1996). “We've had the same loss, why don't we have the same grief?” Loss and differential grief in families. Death Studies, 20, 269–283.
9.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma.New York: Free Press.
10.
LietzC. A.LangerC. L.FurmanR. (2006). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 441–458.
11.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
McCaigN. M. (1996). Understanding global nomads. In SmithC. D. (Ed.) Strangers at home (pp. 99–120). Bayside, NY: Aletheia.
13.
OltjenbrunsK. A. (2001). Developmental context of childhood: Grief and regrief phenomenon. In StroebeM. S.HansonR. O.StrobeW., & SchutH. (Eds.) Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and caring (pp. 169–197). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
OltjenbrunsK. A. (2007). Life span issues and loss, grief, and mourning part 1: The importance of a developmental context: Childhood and adolescence as an example. In BalkD.WogrinC.ThorntonG., & MegherD. (Eds.) Handbook of thanatology: The essential body of knowledge for the study of death, dying, and bereavement (pp. 143–150). Northbrook, IL: The Association for Death Education and Counseling, The Thanatology Association.
15.
ParkesC. M. (1972). Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life.New York: International University Press.
PollockD.C., & Van RekenR. (1999). Third culture kids: The experience of growing up among world.Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
18.
SchaettiB. F. (2002). Attachment theory: A view into the global nomad experience. In EnderM. G. (Ed.), Military brats and other global nomads Growing up in organization families (pp. 103–119). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
