AumannC.LahlO.PietrowskyR. (2012). Relationship between dream structure, boundary structure and the Big Five personality dimensions. Dreaming, 22(2), 124–135. doi: 10.1037/a0028977
2.
BlagroveM.Pace-SchottE. F. (2010). Trait and neurobiological correlates of individual differences in dream recall and dream content. International Review of Neurobiology, 92, 155–180. doi: S0074-7742(10)92008-4 [pii] 10.1016/S0074-7742(10)92008-4
3.
CowenD.LevinR. (1995). The use of the Hartmann Boundary Questionnaire with an adolescent population. Dreaming, 5(2), 105–114. doi: 10.1037/h0094428
4.
FedernP. (1952). Ego psychology and the psychoses. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
FreudS. (1900/1978). The interpretation of dreams. New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1900)
6.
FreudS. (1920/1944). Beyond the pleasure principle (HobackC. M., Trans.). London, UK: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1920)
7.
FreudS. (1923/1976). The ego and the id. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 1–66). London, UK: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1923)
8.
FreudS. (1925/1976). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes (StracheyJ., Trans.). In StracheyJ. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 241–258). London, UK: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1925)
9.
FreudA. (1936/1967). The ego and mechanisms of defense. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1936)
10.
FunkhouserA. T.WürmleO.CornuC. M.BahroM. (2001). Boundary Questionnaire results in the mentally healthy elderly. Dreaming, 11(2), 83–88. doi: 10.1023/A:1009432520849
11.
HarrisonA. J.SingerJ. A. (2009). Differentiating religiousness and spirituality through boundaries of the mind and daydreaming styles. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(4), 323–339.
12.
HarrisonR. H.HartmannE.BevisJ. (2005). The Boundary Questionnaire: Its preliminary reliability and validity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(4), 355–382. doi: 10.2190/8120-6340-T808-7001
13.
HartmannE. (1989). Boundaries of dreams, boundaries of dreamers: Thin and thick boundaries as a new personality measure. Psychiatry Journal of the University of Ottawa, 14(4), 557–560.
14.
HartmannE. (1991). Boundaries in the mind: A new psychology of personality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
HartmannE.HarrisonR.ZborowskiM. (2001). Boundaries in the mind: Past research and future directions. North American Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 347–368.
16.
HartmannE.KunzendorfR. G. (2005). The central image (CI) in recent dreams, dreams that stand out, and earliest dreams: Relationship to boundaries. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(4), 383–392. doi: 10.2190/0Q56-1445-3J16-3831
17.
HartmannE.KunzendorfR. G. (2007). Boundaries and dreams. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1–2), 101–115. doi: 10.2190/HK76-038K-407M-8670
18.
HartmannH. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation (RapaportD., Trans.). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
19.
HouranJ.ThalbourneM. A.HartmannE. (2003). Comparison of two alternative measures of the boundary construct. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(1), 311–323. doi: 10.2466/PMS.96.1.311-323
20.
HubaG. J.AneshenselC. S.SingerJ. L. (1981). Development of scales for three second-order factors of inner experience. Multivariate Behavior, 16(2), 181–206.
21.
JamesW. (1907/1975). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
JungC. G. (1921/1971). Psychological types. In ReadH.FordamM.AdlerG. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
KunzendorfR. G.HartmannE.CohenR.CutlerJ. (1997). Bizarreness of the dreams and daydreams reported by individuals with thin and thick boundaries. Dreaming, 7(4), 265–271. doi: 10.1037/h0094482
24.
McCraeR. R. (1993). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13(1), 39–55. doi: 10.2190/H8H6-QYKR-KEU8-GAQ0
25.
PaciniR.EpsteinS. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987.
26.
RapaportD. (1942). Emotions and memory. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
27.
RawlingsD. (2001). An exploratory factor analysis of Hartmann's Boundary Questionnaire and an empirically-derived short version. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 21(2), 131–144. doi: 10.2190/3XM9-LGA6-MJ76-X658
28.
SchredlM. (2003). Effects of state and trait factors on nightmare frequency. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 253(5), 241–247. doi: 10.1007/s00406-003-0438-1
29.
SchredlM.BocklageA.EngelhardtJ.MingebachT. (2009). Psychological boundaries, dream recall, and nightmare frequency: A new Boundary Personality Questionnaire (BPQ). International Journal of Dream Research, 2(1), 12–19.
30.
ShapiroD. (1965). Neurotic styles. New York, NY: Basic Books.
31.
SingerJ. A.ConwayM. A. (2011). Reconsidering therapeutic action: Loewald, cognitive neuroscience, and the integration of memory's duality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 1183–1207.
32.
TartzR. S.BakerR. C.KrippnerS. (2006). Cognitive differences in dream content and boundary structure between Asian and Pacific Islander Americans and European Americans using quantitative content analysis. Dreaming, 16(2), 111–128. doi: 10.1037/1053-0797.16.2.111
33.
ThalbourneM. A. (1991). The psychology of mystical experience. Exceptional Human Experience, 9, 168–186.
34.
ThalbourneM. A.MaltbyJ. (2008). Transliminality, thin boundaries, unusual experiences, and temporal lobe lability. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1617–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.022
35.
YuC. K.-C. (2010). Dream intensity profile as an indicator of the hysterical tendencies to dissociation and conversion. Dreaming, 20(3), 184–198. doi: 10.1037/a0020421
36.
ZborowskiM. J.HartmannE.NewsomM. A.BanarM. (2003). The Hartman Boundary Questionnaire: Two studies examining personality correlates and interpersonal behavior. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23(1), 45–62. doi: 10.2190/TPMB-PE1A-L6UU-1JUL