College Admissions Tests are designed to predict academic achievement in college but their use is often criticized as being biased toward selecting uncreative students who think “inside the box” and whose learning is superficial. The empirical literature hints that standardized tests do predict creative outcomes, although not as well as they predict achievement. However, few studies have examined actual creative products devised by college students. With a sample of 116 college students, the present study tested whether admission test scores on the American College Testing program exam (ACT) were predictive of a creative writing task involving the imagination of personalities. For comparison with the ACT, we used the Big Five Inventory as a personality predictor of creativity with a particular focus on Openness to Experience. The activity took place several years after students took the ACT. Results showed that the ACT and Openness predicted the Personality Imagination Exercise but both were mediated by verbal fluency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACT. (2007). The ACT technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
BairdL. E. (1977). What graduate and professional school students think about admissions tests. East Lansing, MI: National Council on Measurement in Education.
4.
Benet-MartínezV.JohnO. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analysis of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
5.
BoiceR. (1983). Experimental and clinical treatments of writing block. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 183–191.
6.
ChenC.HimselA.KasofJ.GreenbergerE.DmitrievaJ. (2006). Boundless creativity: Evidence for the domain generality of individual differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179–199.
7.
CronbachL. J. (1975). Five decades of public controversy over mental testing. American Psychologist, 30, 1–14.
8.
CrouseJ.TrusheimD. (1988). The case against the SAT. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DollingerS. J. (2004). Predicting personality-behavior relations: A teaching activity. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 48–51.
10.
DollingerS. J.McMorrowM. A. (1992). Something to hide? Consent-granting for release of standardized test scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 411–416.
11.
ElbowP. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford.
12.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
13.
GoseB. (2005, February 25). Looking beyond “U.S. News,” rethinking the SAT. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(25), B8.
14.
HaneyW. (1981). Validity, vaudeville, and values: A short history of social concerns over standardized testing. American Psychologist, 36, 1021–1034.
15.
HocevarD. (1979, April). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 350.).
16.
HocevarD.BachelorP. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In GloverJ. A.RonningR. R.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York: Plenum.
17.
HoffmanB. (1962). The tyranny of testing. New York: Collier Books.
18.
KaczmarekL. (2010, Summer). In old New York. Mystery Scene, 115, 14–15.
19.
KimK. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.
20.
KingL. A.WalkerL. M.BroylesS. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.
21.
KuncelN. R.HezlettS. A.OnesD. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.
22.
LeamyE. (2010, November 5). Has teen unlocked the secret to a better SAT score? Teen's study finds longer essays score better. Retrieved January 7, 2011 from http://abcnews.go.com/GMAC/ConsumerNews.
23.
LinnR. L. (1982). Admissions testing on trial. American Psychologist, 37, 279–291.
24.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.WebbR. M.Bleske-RechekA. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194–199.
McCraeR. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
27.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
28.
NairnA., & Associates. (1980). The reign of ETS: The corporation that makes up minds. Washington, DC: Ralph Nader/Learning Research Project.
29.
NoftleE. E.RobinsR. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116–130.
ParkG.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952.
32.
PluckerJ. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126–137.
33.
PowersD. E.KaufmanJ. C. (2004). Do standardized tests penalize deep thinking, creative, or conscientious students? Some personality correlates of Graduate Record Examination test scores. Intelligence, 32, 145–153.
34.
ReichR. B. (2001, June 20). Standards for what?Education Week, 20(41), 64.
35.
RuncoM. A. (2007). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
36.
SackettP. R.BornemanM. J.ConnellyB. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63, 215–227.
37.
SacksP. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA.: Perseus Publishing.
38.
SchaeferC.DiamondR. (1998). The creative writing guide: Poetry, literary non-fiction, fiction, and drama. New York: Longman/Addison Wesley Longman.
39.
SedlacekW. E. (1998). Multiple choices for standardized tests. AGB Priorities (Number 10; Winter issue).
40.
SedlacekW. E. (2000). Alternative admissions and scholastic selection measures in higher education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 263–272.
41.
SmithC. P. (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
