Blind (and visually impaired) children make use of perceptual cues from multimodal sensory input of known objects when they draw. In this study, we examined drawings of spinning wheels made by 12-year-old congenitally blind children. The drawings can be analyzed in terms of metaphoric and metonymic mappings from perceptual cues of different objects. Just as metaphoric language is understood through embodiment, the drawings are made through embodiment or perceptual symbolic simulations that have their parallel in language. We considered the relation between metaphor in haptic drawings and language from the perspective of situated simulation in which imagery, motion, and introspection play a crucial role in the shaping of concepts. Reference corpora offer evidence of the verbal correlates of such simulations in English and Spanish.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArppeA.GaetanelleG.GlynnD.HilpertM.ZeschelA. (2011). Cognitive corpus linguistics. Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(1), 1–27.
2.
BarsalouL. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562.
3.
BarsalouL. W. (2005). Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 309–311.
4.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Situating concepts. In RobbinsP.AydedeM. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 236–263). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
D'AngiulliA.MaggiS. (2003). Development of drawing abilities in a distinct population: Depiction of perceptual principles by three children with congenital total blindness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 193–200.
6.
FaberP.TercedorM. (2001). Codifying conceptual information in descriptive terminology management. Meta: Journal des traducteurs46(1), 192–204.
7.
FalkenhainerB.ForbusK. D.GentnerD. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1), 1–63.
8.
ForcevilleC. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14.
9.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
10.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (2006a). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GibbsR. W. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21, 434–458.
12.
GibbsR. W. (2008). Metaphor and gesture: Some implications for psychology. In CienkiA.MüllerC. (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13.
GibbsR. W.Costa-LimaP. L.FrancozoE. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.
KennedyJ. (1982). Metaphor in pictures. Perception, 11, 589–605.
16.
KennedyJ. (1993). Drawing & the blind: Pictures to touch (1st ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
KennedyJ. (2009). Outline, mental states, and drawings by a blind woman. Perception, 38, 1481–1496.
18.
LakoffG. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LouwerseM. M. (2008). Embodied representations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 838–844.
20.
LouwerseM. M.JeuniauxP. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96–104.
21.
MillarS. (1994). Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
OrtonyA.VondruskaR.FossM.JonesL. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569–594.
23.
REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Banco de datos (CREA) [online]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. http://www.rae.es [Consulted: January 7th 2010].
24.
SantosA.ChaigneauS. E.SimmonsW. K.BarsalouL. W. (2008). Word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing: Behavioral confirmation of neuro-imaging findings. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
SimmonsW. K.HamannS. B.HarenskiC. L.HuX. P.BarselouL. W. (2008). fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation. Journal of Psychology, 102, 105–119.
26.
SinclairJ. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
TercedorM.LópezC. I. (2008). Integrating corpus data in dynamic knowledge bases: The Puertoterm project. Terminology, 14, 159–182.
28.
TverskyA. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
29.
WuL. L.BarsalouL. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132, 173–189.
