Abstract
Two hundred thirty-nine college students were administered Higgins' Revised Self-Control Scale, Huang, DeJong, Schneider, and Towvim's Composite Drinking Scale, and our own Multiple Styles of Self-Control Scale. Greater amounts of alcohol consumption were associated with two styles of self-control—Sociopathic and Consequence-Oriented styles—and lesser amounts of drinking were associated with 2 more of the 14 styles under study—Suppressive and Self-Soothing styles. These findings suggest that the most effective way to negate an impulse is to weaken the impulse itself—through either suppression or self-soothing—and that the least effective way is to try rationally to counteract the impulse by thinking about the consequences of giving in to it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
