Abstract
One hundred seventy-one subjects were administered Crumbaugh and Maholick's (1981) Purpose in Life Test as a measure of meaninglessness versus existential meaning; Beck, Weissman, Lester, and Trexler's (1974) Hopelessness Scale as a measure of hopelessness versus hope; and Farmer and Sundberg's (1986) Boredom Proneness Scale as a measure of boredom versus interest. Four findings emerged. First, either hope alone or interest alone was sufficient to elevate existential meaning. Second, interest alone was associated with a level of meaning statistically equivalent to the levels associated with hope alone and with hope and interest combined. Third, loss of hope was associated with suicidal ideation, but loss of interest was not. Fourth, compared to subjects identifying with no religion, those identifying with a religion exhibited significantly greater hopefulness, but not significantly greater interest. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
