Previous questionnaire studies of parapsychological experiences have found significant interrelations between the experiences in question and dream experiences. In this study we present a replication of these relationships using a nationality of participants neglected in previous studies, a predominantly Spanish sample. A questionnaire was published in a Spanish New Age magazine. Four hundred and ninety-two questionnaires were received. Most of the parapsychological experiences correlated significantly and positively with each other and with dream recall and lucid dream frequency (Bonferroni-corrected). The results are consistent with the idea discussed in terms of boundary thinness, dissociation, and fantasy proneness that there is a disposition, or openness in some individuals to have or to believe they have had seemingly parapsychological experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvaradoC. S., Exploring the Features of Spontaneous Psychic Experiences, European Journal of Parapsychology, 12, pp. 61–74, 1996.
2.
AlvaradoC. S., Out-of-Body Experiences, in Varieties of Anomalous Experiences: Examining the Scientific Evidence, CardeñaE.LynnS. J., and KrippnerS. (eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 183–218, 2000.
3.
GreysonB., Near-Death Experiences, in Varieties of Anomalous Experiences: Examining the Scientific Evidence, CardeñaE.LynnS. J., and KrippnerS. (eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 315–352, 2000.
4.
IrwinH. J., The Phenomenology of Parapsychological Experiences, in Advances in Parapsychological Research 7, KrippnerS. (ed.), McFarland, Jefferson, North Carolina, pp. 10–76, 1994.
5.
KohrR. L., A Survey of Psi Experiences Among Members of a Special Population, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 74, pp. 395–411, 1980.
6.
PalmerJ., A Community Mail Survey of Psychic Experiences, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 73, pp. 221–251, 1979.
7.
AlvaradoC. S. and ZingroneN. L., Individual Differences in Aura Vision: Relationships to Visual Imagery and Imaginative-Fantasy Experiences, European Journal of Parapsychology, 10, pp. 1–30, 1994.
8.
AlvaradoC. S. and ZingroneN. L., Out-of-Body Experiences Among Readers of a Spanish New Age Magazine, Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 63, pp. 65–85, 1999.
9.
AlvaradoC. S.ZingroneN. L., and DaltonK., Out-of-Body Experiences, Alterations of Consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of Personality, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 18, pp. 297–317, 1998–1999.
10.
SherwoodS. J., Relationship between Childhood Hypnagogic/Hypnopompic and Sleep Experiences, Childhood Fantasy Proneness, and Anomalous Experiences and Beliefs: An Exploratory WWW Survey, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 93, pp. 167–197, 1999.
11.
UshaS. and PasrichaS., Claims of Paranormal Experiences—II: Attitudes toward Psychical Research and Factors Associated with Psi and Psi-Related Experiences, NIMHANS Journal, 7, pp. 151–157, 1989.
12.
HartmannE., Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality, Basic Books, New York, 1991.
13.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., and CummingsJ., Types of High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals and Reported Attitudes and Experiences of the Paranormal and the Anomalous, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86, pp. 135–150, 1992.
14.
RichardsD. G., A Study of the Correlation between Subjective Psychic Experiences and Dissociative Experiences, Dissociation, 4, pp. 83–91, 1991.
15.
MyersF. W. H., Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death (2 vols.), Longmans, Green, London, 1903.
16.
GómezMontanelli D. E. and ParraA., ¿Las Experiencias Paranormales son Psicológicamente Perturbadoras? Una Encuesta Comparando Estudiantes Universitarios y Aficionados a Temas Paranormales [Are Paranormal Experiences Psychologically Disturbing? A Survey Comparing University Students to Aficionados of Paranormal Topics], Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 39, pp. 285–294, 2005.
17.
AlvaradoC. S., The Place of Spontaneous Cases in Parapsychology, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 90, pp. 1–34, 1996.
18.
IrwinH. J., Parapsychological Phenomena and the Absorption Domain, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 79, pp. 1–11, 1985.
19.
ThalbourneM. A. and DelinP. S., A Common Thread Underlying Belief in the Paranormal, Creative Personality, Mystical Experience and Psychopathology, Journal of Parapsychology, 58, pp. 3–38, 1994.
20.
McCreeryC., Hallucinations and Arousability: Pointers to a Theory of Psychosis, in Schizotypy: Implications for Illness and Health, ClaridgeG. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 251–273, 1997.
21.
WilsonS. C. and BarberT. X., The Fantasy-Prone Personality: Implications for Understanding Imagery, Hypnosis, and Parapsychological Phenomena, in Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application, SheikhA. A. (ed.), John Wiley, New York, pp. 340–387, 1983.
22.
StevensonI., Telepathic Impressions: A Review and Report of 35 New Cases, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1970.
23.
SherwoodS. J. and RoeC. A., A Review of Dream ESP Studies Conducted Since the Maimonides Dream ESP Studies, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, pp. 85–110, 2003.
