In this study, an interactive process in a Web-based learning environment was planned for the cultivation of students' cooperative learning skills and capacity for scientific inquiry. Based on detailed analyses of students' computer protocols, interview protocols, and test scores, this project sought to analyze the changes in students' scientific concepts and the development of their science process skills (SPS) after they had completed a series of Web-based lessons. Forty senior high school students were chosen and grouped into eight heterogeneous groups for online cooperative learning. As the data showed, the Web-based course used in this study can help students gain a better understanding of subject-related concepts and improve their science process skills. We also found that students with different SPS abilities had significantly different SPS improvement. Low-SPS students have made the most rapid progress in building their science process skills while the high-SPS students made the least progress after interacting with four Web-based lessons. It was also found that heterogeneous grouping in a cooperative learning environment increases the weak learners' motivation and participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlumenfeldP. C.MarxR. W.SolowayE.KrajclkJ. (1997). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37–40.
2.
BrooksJ. G.BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
Cavalli-SforzaV.WeinerA.LesgoldA. (1994). Software support for students engaging in scientific activity and scientific controversy. Science Education, 78, 577–599.
4.
ClarkD.SlottaJ. D. (2000). Interpreting evidence on the Internet: Sex, lies, and multimedia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 859–871.
5.
EdelsonD. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355–385.
6.
FishmanB. J.D'AmicoL. M. (1994). Which way will the wind blow? Networked computer tools for studying the weather. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED388245).
7.
GagnèR. M. (1985, February). The psychological basis of science—A process approach. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) miscellaneous publication, pp. 65–68.
8.
GallM. D.BorgW. R.GallJ. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman Publishers.
9.
GallupeR. B.BastianuttiL. M.CooperW. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137–142.
10.
GlynnS. M.DuitR. (1995). Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
HatcherL.StepanskiE. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Vary, NC: SAS Institute.
12.
HoadleyC. M.LinnM. C. (2000). Teaching science through online peer discussion: A speakeasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 839–857.
13.
HooperS. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21–38.
14.
HooperS.HannafinM. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 31(3), 27–40.
15.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1984). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroomAlexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
JohnsonR. T.JohnsonD. W. (1987, September). How can we put cooperative learning into practice?The Science Teacher, 54(6), 46–50.
17.
JohnsonL. C.WaxmanH. C. (1985, April). Evaluating the effects of the “Groups of Four” program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
18.
KafaiY. B. (1995). Mind in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
KieslerJ.McGuireH. (1987). Aspects of computer-mediated communication. International Psychologist, 32(10), 45–67.
20.
KrajcikJ. S. (2000). Advantages and challenges of using the World Wide Web to foster sustained scientific inquiry in middle and high school classrooms. 8th International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, Taipei, Taiwan.
21.
KuhnD. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.
22.
LinnM. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103–126.
23.
MaoS. L. (1994). A study of educational indicators: Learning progress indicators for science process skills. Taiwan: Annual report for the National Science Council, NSC 83-0111-S003–023.
24.
MischlerE. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.
PadillaM. J.OkeyJ. R.GarrardK. (1984). The effects of instruction on integrated science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 277–287.
27.
ParkM. J. (1999). The effect of a shared intranet science learning environment on academic behavior. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED432274).
28.
ParkerA. (1999). Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review, 12, 13–17.
29.
RanneyM.SchankP. (1995). Protocol modeling, textual analysis, the bifurcation/bootstrapping method, and convince me: Computer-based techniques for studying beliefs and their revision. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 239–243.
30.
Reyth-MaromR.ChajutE.RoccasS.SagivL. (2003). Internet-assisted versus traditional distance learning environments: Factors affecting students' preferences. Computers & Education, 41, 65–76.
31.
RiedlingA. M. (1999). Distance education: The technology—what you need to know to succeed, an overview. Educational Technology Review, 12, 8–13.
32.
SlavinR. E. (1996). Cooperative learning—theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
SteeplesC. (1993). A computer-mediated learning environment for adult learners: Supporting collaboration and self-direction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 443–454.
34.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.Van BerkumG.Swen-KoopmansT. (1987). The effect of cooperation and shared feedback on spelling achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 92–94.
35.
WatabeK. (1995). An Internet based collaborative distance learning system: CODILESS. Computers & Education, 24(3), 141–155.
