To determine whether there are different technical styles, syntactic structures at three audience levels in the published writing of three disciplines were analyzed. Our analysis discloses that different disciplines rely primarily on different types of subordinate clauses, sentence openers, and sentence types. It also discloses that paragraph length varies with audience level, as do the number of subject sentence openers and the kinds of verb constructions. Next, we compare our findings with standard textbook treatments of style and advocate a more flexible approach to the teaching of technical style, one that accounts for variations in subject matter and audience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
D'AngeloF., A Conceptual Theory of Rhetoric, Winthrop Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975.
2.
MillerC. R.A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40, pp. 610–617, 619, February 1979.
3.
AndersonP. V., Out of the Schoolroom: Sentence Combining in Training Programs for Business, Industry, and Government, in Sentence Combining and the Teaching of Writing, DaikerKerek, and Morenberg (eds.), L & S Books, Conway, Arkansas, pp. 184–191, 1979.
4.
CorbettE. P. J., Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, p. 433, 1971.
5.
PaulT. and RosnerM., Using Sentence-Combining in Technical Writing Classes, Technical Perspectives for the Eighties, NASA, pp. 527–534, 1981.
6.
RosnerM., Sentence-Combining in Technical Writing: An Editing Tool, The Technical Writing Teacher, pp. 100–109, Winter 1982.
